Correlating cone biopsy histology with operative indications

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 286-290

  Massad, L Stewart ^a,b   Chronopoulos, Foti T ^a   Cejtin, Helen E ^a  

^a Jr Hospital of Cook County   (United States)

^b RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CURETTAGE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

EID: 0031148796     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4658     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Hall E J, Boyce J G, Nelson J H. Carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri: A study of 409 cases. Obstet Gynecol. 34:1969;221-225.
2. Chao S, McCaffrey R M, Todd W D, Moore J G. Conization in evaluation and management of cervical neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 103:1969;574-584.
3. Scheffey L C, Lang W R, Tatarian G T. An experimental program with colposcopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 70:1955;876-888.
4. Chanen W, Hollyock V E. Colposcopy and electrocoagulation-diathermy for cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Obstet Gynecol. 37:1971;623-628.
5. Massad L S, Cejtin H E. Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: History and Detection. Gynecology and Obstetrics. 1996;Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia. p. 1-18.
6. Matseoane S, Williams S B, Navarro C, Hedriana H, Mushayandebvu T. Diagnostic value of conization of the uterine cervix in the management of cervical neoplasia: a review of 756 consecutive patients. Gynecol Oncol. 47:1992;287-291.
7. Broder S. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnosis: report of the 1991 Bethesda Workshop. JAMA. 267:1992;1982.
8. Ferenczy A, Winkler B. Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Condyloma. Kurman R J. Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital. 1987;177-217 Springer Verlag, New York.
9. McCullagh P. Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B. 42:1980;109-142.
10. Oyesanya O A, Amerasinghe C, Manning E AD. A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy. Gynecol Oncol. 50:1993;84-88.
11. Turner M J, Rasmussen M J, Flannelly G M, Kelehan P, Lenehan P M, Murphy J F. Outpatient loop diathermy conization as an alternative to inpatient knife conization of the cervix. J Reprod Med. 37:1992;314-316.
12. Naumann R W, Bell M C, Alvarez R D, Edwards R P, Partridge E E, Helm C W, Shingleton H M, McGee J A, Higgins R V, Hall J B. LLETZ is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic cold-knife conization. Gynecol Oncol. 55:1994;224-228.
13. Girardi F, Heydarfadai M, Koroschetz F, Pickel H, Winter R. Cold-knife conization versus loop excision: histopathologic and clinical results of a randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol. 55:1994;368-370.
14. Widrich T, Kennedy A W, Myers T M, Hart W R, Wirth S. Adenocarcinomain situ. Gynecol Oncol. 61:1996;304-308.
15. Baggish M S, Dorsey J H, Adelson M. A ten-year experience treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with the CO2 laser. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 161:1989;60-68.
16. Tabor A, Berget A. Cold-knife and laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol. 76:1990;633-635.
17. Montz F J, Holschneider C H, Thompson L DR. Large-loop excision of the transformation zone: effect on the pathologic interpretation of resection margins. Obstet Gynecol. 81:1993;976-982.
18. Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener H C, Malamou-Mitsi V, Agnanti N, Lolis D. Thermal tissue damage following laser and large loop conization of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 84:1994;752-754.
19. Ostor A G. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 12:1993;186-192.
20. Richart R M, Barron B A. A follow-up study of patients with cervical dysplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 105:1969;386-393.
21. McCord M L, Stovall T G, Summitt R L, Ling F W. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary? Obstet Gynecol. 77:1991;715-719.