Response to Hammond et al. Showing leads to doing, but doing what? The need for experimental pilot-testing [2]

European Journal of Public Health

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 225-

  Ruiter, Robert A C ^a   Kok, Gerjo ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CIGARETTE SMOKING; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; LETTER; NETHERLANDS; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; SMOKING CESSATION;

EID: 33645462360     PISSN: 11011262     EISSN: 1464360X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckl014     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Hammond D, Fong GT, McDonald PW, et al. Showing leads to doing: graphic warning labels are an effective public health policy. Eur J Public Health 2006;16:223.
2. Witte K, Allen M. A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ Behav 2000;27: 591-615.
3. De Vries H, Mudde A, Dijkstra A, Willemsen M. Differential beliefs, perceived social influences and self-efficacy expectations among smokers in various motivational phases. Prev Med 1998; 27:681-9.
4. Taubman Ben-Ari O, Florian V, Mikulincer M. Does a threat appeal moderate reckless driving? A terror management theory perspective. Accid Anal Prev 2000;32:1-10.
5. Wilson TD. Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2002.