Motor rehabilitation of stroke patients;Rehabilitation motorischer funktionsstörungen nach schlaganfall

Aktuelle Neurologie

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 90-98

  Woldag, Hartwig ^a   Hummelsheim, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOTULINUM TOXIN A;

CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; CONTINUING EDUCATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION; HAND FUNCTION; HUMAN; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; REVIEW; STROKE;

EID: 33645457891     PISSN: 03024350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-915381     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Woldag H, Hummelsheim H. Evidence-based physiotherapeutic concepts for improving arm and hand function in stroke patients: a review. J Neurol 2002; 249: 518-528
2. Dickstein R, Hocherman S, Pillar T, Shaham R. Stroke rehabilitation. Three exercise therapy approaches. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 1233-1238
3. Logigian MK, Samuels MA, Falconer J, Zagar R. Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 364-367
4. Stern PH, McDowell F, Miller JM, Robinson M. Effects of facilitation exercise techniques in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1970; 51: 526-531
5. Basmajian JV, Gowland CA, Finlayson MA et al. Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioral-physical therapy vs traditional physical therapy programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987; 68: 267-272
6. Lincoln NB, Parry RH, Vass CD. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke 1999; 30: 573-579
7. Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 361-369
8. Asanuma H, Pavlides C. Neurobiological basis of motor learning in mammals. Neuroreport 1997; 8: i-vi
9. Asanuma H, Keller A. Neuronal mechanisms of motor learning in mammals. Neuroreport 1991; 2: 217-224
10. Woldag H, Waldmann G, Knösche TR et al. Rapidly induced changes in neuromagnetic fields following repetitive hand movements. Europ J Neurol, 2005, in press
11. Classen J, Liepert J, Wise SP et al. Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. J Neurophysiol 1998; 79: 1117-1123
12. Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke MT et al. Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke 1995; 26: 976-981
13. Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitensky N, Mayo NE. A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke 1998; 29: 1122-1128
14. Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C, Ruckriem S. Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2002; 33: 553-558
15. Werner C, Frankenberg S Von, Treig T et al. Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: a randomized crossover study. Stroke 2002; 33: 2895-2901
16. Hesse S, Malezic M, Schaffrin A, Mauritz KH. Restoration of gait by combined treadmill training and multichannel electrical stimulation in non-ambulatory hemiparetic patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 1995; 27: 199-204
17. Malezic M, Hesse S. Restoration of gait by functional electrical stimulation in paraplegic patients: a modified programme of treatment. Paraplegia 1995; 33: 126-131
18. Malezic M, Hesse S, Schewe H, Mauritz KH. Restoration of standing, weight-shift and gait by multichannel electrical stimulation in hemiparetic patients. Int J Rehabil Res 1994; 17: 169-179
19. Merletti R, Zelaschi F, Latella D et al. A control study of muscle force recovery in hemiparetic patients during treatment with functional electrical stimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med 1978; 10: 147-154
20. Yan T, Hui-Chan CWY, Li LSW. Functional electrical stimulation improves motor recovery of the lower extremity and walking ability of subjects with first acute stroke: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Stroke 2005; 36: 80-85
21. Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995; 130: 59-68
22. Woldag H, Waldmann G, Heuschkel G, Hummelsheim H. Is the repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements beneficial for motor recovery in stroke patients? Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 723-730
23. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M et al. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. Stroke 1999; 30: 586-592
24. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347-354
25. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999; 36: 237-251
26. Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I et al. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1374-1377
27. Sterr A, Freivogel S. Motor-improvement following intensive training in low-functioning chronic hemiparesis. Neurology 2003; 61: 842-844
28. Platz T, Winter T, Muller N et al. Arm ability training for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients with mild arm paresis: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 961-968
29. Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N et al. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol 1997; 54: 443-446
30. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N et al. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 2000; 54: 1938-1944
31. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC et al. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 952-959
32. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J et al. Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1106-1111
33. Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M et al. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 915-920
34. Burgar CG, Lum PS, Shor PC, Machiel Van der Loos HF. Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000; 37: 663-673
35. Hummelsheim H, Amberger S, Mauritz KH. The influence of EMG-initiated electrical muscle stimulation on motor recovery of the centrally paretic hand. Eur J Neurol 1996; 3: 245-254
36. Hummelsheim H, Maier-Loth ML, Eickhof C. The functional value of electrical muscle stimulation for the rehabilitation of the hand in stroke patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 1997; 29: 3-10
37. Kroon JR de, Ijzerman MJ, Chae J et al. Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 65-74
38. Decety J, Grezes J. Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends Cogn Sci 1999; 3: 172-178
39. Herbert RD, Dean C, Gandevia SC. Effects of real and imagined training on voluntary muscle activation during maximal isometric contractions. Acta Physiol Scand 1998; 163: 361-368
40. Pascual-Leone A, Nguyet D, Cohen LG et al. Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. J Neurophysiol 1995; 74: 1037-1045
41. Yue G, Cole KJ. Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. J Neurophysiol 1992; 67: 1114-1123
42. Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F et al. Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 1133-1141
43. Bakheit AM, Pittock S, Moore AP et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in upper limb spasticity in patients with stroke. Eur J Neurol 2001; 8: 559-565
44. Hesse S, Brandl-Hesse B, Bardeleben A et al. Botulinum toxin A treatment of adult upper and lower limb spasticity. Drugs Aging 2001; 18: 255-262
45. Pittock SJ, Moore AP, Hardiman O et al. A double-blind randomised placebo-controlled evaluation of three doses of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) in the treatment of spastic equinovarus deformity after stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003; 15: 289-300
46. Reiter F, Danni M, Ceravolo MG, Provinciali L. Disability changes after treatment of upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin. J Neuro Rehab 1996; 10: 47-52
47. Rousseaux M, Kozlowski O, Froger J. Efficacy of botulinum toxin A in upper limb function of hemiplegic patients. J Neurol 2002; 249: 76-84
48. Woldag H, Hummelsheim H. Is the reduction of spasticity by botulinum toxin a beneficial for the recovery of motor function of arm and hand in stroke patients? Eur Neurol 2003; 50: 165-171
49. Ward AB, Aguilar M, de Beyl Z et al. Use of botulinum toxin type A in management of adult spasticity. A European consensus statement. Eura Medicophys 2004; 40: 83-84
50. Bakheit AM, Fedorova NV, Skoromets AA et al. The beneficial antispasticity effect of botulinum toxin type A is maintained after repeated treatment cycles. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75: 1558-1561
51. Treig T, Werner C, Sachse M, Hesse S. No benefit from D-amphetamine when added to physiotherapy after stroke: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 590-599
52. Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Muller F, Koenig E. Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: a prospective, randomised, double-blind study. Lancet 2001; 358: 787-790