High-frequency auditory feedback is not required for adult song maintenance in Bengalese finches

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 358-371

  Woolley, Sarah M N ^a   Rubel, Edwin W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory; Auditory feedback; Deprivation; Finch; Hair cell; Hearing; Song; Sound frequencies

Indexed keywords

AMIKACIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; AUDIOGRAPHY; BIRD; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HAIR CELL; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

EID: 0032938388     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.19-01-00358.1999     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Alexandrov LI, Dmitrieva LP (1991) Hearing development in altricial birds: absolute evoked potentials thresholds. Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel'Nosti 41:384-390.
2. Beaubien AR, Karpinski K, Ormsby E (1995) Toxicodynamics and toxicokinetics of Amikacin in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 83:62-79.
3. Bone RC, Ryan AF (1978) Audiometric and histologic correlates of the interaction between kanamycin and subtraumatic levels of noise in the chinchilla. Otolaryngology 86:400-404.
4. Brenowitz EA (1983) The contribution of temporal song cues to species recognition in the red-winged blackbird. Anim Behav 31:1116-1127.
5. Brummett RE, Fox KE, Jacobs F, Kempton JB, Stokes Z, Richmond AB (1990) Augmented gentamicin ototoxicity induced by vancomycin in guinea pigs. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116:61-64.
6. Brummett RE, Fox KE, Kempton JB (1992) Quantitative relationships of the interaction between sound and kanamycin. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:498-500.
7. Clayton NS (1987) Song learning in Bengalese finches: a comparison with zebra finches. Ethology 76:247-255.
8. Clayton NS (1988) Song tutor choice in zebra finches and Bengalese finches: the relative importance of visual and vocal cues. Behaviour 104:281-299.
9. Clayton NS (1989) The effects of cross-fostering on selective song learning in estrildid finches. Behaviour 109:163-175.
10. Collins PW (1988) Synergistic interactions of gentamicin and pure tones causing cochlear hair cell loss in pigmented guinea pigs. Hear Res 36:249-259.
11. Cotanche DA, Lee KH, Stone JS, Picard DA (1994) Hair cell regeneration in the bird cochlea following noise damage or ototoxic drug damage. Anat Embryol (Berl) 189:1-18.
12. Dietrich K (1980) Model choice in the song development of young male Bengalese finches. Z Tierpsychol 52:57-76.
13. Dittus WP, Lemon RE (1969) Effects of song tutoring and acoustic isolation on the song repertoires of cardinals. Anim Behav 17:523-533.
14. Dmitrieva LP, Khayutin SN (1989) Hearing mechanisms in birds. Their structure, function and ontogeny. Usp Fiziol Nauk 20:46-67.
15. Duckert LG, Rubel EW (1990) Ultrastructural observations on regenerating hair cells in the chick basilar papilla. Hear Res 48:161-182.
16. Duckert LG, Rubel EW (1993) Morphological correlates of functional recovery in the chicken inner car after gentamycin treatment. J Comp Neurol 331:75-96.
17. Eales LA (1985) Song learning in zebra finches: some effects of song model availability on what is learnt and when. Anim Behav 33:1293-1300.
18. Emlen ST (1972) An experimental analysis of the parameters of bird song eliciting species recognition. Behaviour 41:130-171.
19. Girod DA, Tucci DL, Rubel EW (1991) Anatomical correlates of functional recovery in the avian inner ear following aminoglycoside ototoxicity. Laryngoscope 101:1139-1149.
20. Golubeva TV (1996) Acoustically guided behavior in the early ontogeny of the long-eared owl: the development of hearing sensitivity. Zhurnal Vysshei Nervnoi Deyatel'Nosti 46:317-327.
21. Gottlieb G (1979) Development of species identification in ducklings. V. Perceptual differentiation in the embryo. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:831-854.
22. Gottlieb G (1980) Development of species identification in ducklings. VI. Specific embryonic experience required to maintain species-typical perception in Peking ducklings. J Comp Physiol Psychol 94:579-587.
23. Gray L (1992) An auditory psychometric function from newborn chicks. J Acoust Soc Am 91:1608-1615.
24. Hashino E, Tanaka Y, Salvi RJ, Sokabe M (1992) Hair cell regeneration in the adult budgerigar after kanamycin ototoxicity. Hear Res 59:46-58.
25. Immelmann K (1969) Song development in the zebra finch and other estrildid finches. In: Bird vocalizations (Hinde RA, ed). pp 61-77. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.
26. Jackson H, Rubel EW (1978) Ontogeny of behavioral responsiveness to sound in the chick embryo as indicated by electrical recordings of motility. J Comp Physiol Psychol 92:682-696.
27. Jones SM, Jones TA (1995) The tonotopic map in the embryonic chicken cochlea. Hear Res 82:149-157.
28. Khayutin SN, Dmitrieva LP (1987) Functional characteristics of development of hearing in altricial birds: association with natural behavior. Sensory Systems 1:233-240.
29. Kitasato I, Yokota M, Inouye S, Igarashi M (1990) Comparative ototoxicity of ribostamycin, doactimicin, kanamycin, amikacin, tobramycin, gentamicin, sisomicin and netilmicin in the inner ear of guinea pigs. Chemotherapy 36:155-168.
30. Konishi M (1965) The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the white-crowned sparrow. Z Tierpsychol 22:770-783.
31. Konishi M (1994) An outline of recent advances in birdsong neurobiology. Brain Behav Evol 44:279-285.
32. Lenoir M, Puel JL (1987) Dose-dependent changes in the rat cochlea following aminoglycoside intoxication. II. Histological study. Hear Res 26:199-209.
33. Lippe W, Rubel EW (1983) Development of the place principle: tonotopic organization. Science 219:514-516.
34. Manley GA, Brix J, Kaiser A (1987) Developmental stability of the tonotopic organization of the chick's basilar papilla. Science 237:655-666.
35. Marean GC, Burt JM, Beecher MD, Rubel EW (1993) Hair cell regeneration in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): recovery of puretone detection thresholds. Hear Res 71:125-126.
36. Marean GC, Cunningham D, Burt JM, Beecher MD, Rubel EW (1995) Regenerated hair cells in the European starling: are they more resistant to kanamycin ototoxicity than original hair cells? Hear Res 82:267-276.
37. Marler P (1987) Sensitive periods and the roles of specific and general sensory stimulation in birdsong learning. In: Imprinting and cortical plasticity: comparative aspects of sensitive periods (Rauschecker JP, Marler P, eds), pp 99-135. New York: Wiley.
38. Marler P (1991) Song-learning behavior: the interface with neuroethology. Trends Neurosci 14:199-206.
39. Marler P, Peters S (1987) A sensitive period for song acquisition in the song sparrow, Melospiza melodia: a case of age-limited learning. Ethology 76:89-100.
40. Marler P, Waser MS (1977) Role of auditory feedback in canary song development. J Comp Physiol Psychol 91:8-16.
41. Nordeen KW, Nordeen EJ (1992) Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches. Behav Neural Biol 57:58-66.
42. Okanoya K, Dooling RJ (1987) Hearing in passerine and psittacine birds: a comparative study of absolute and masked auditory thresholds. J Comp Psychol 101:7-15.
43. Okanoya K, Yamaguchi A (1997) Adult Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) require real-time auditory feedback to produce normal song syntax. J Neurobiol 33:343-356.
44. Price PH (1979) Developmental determinants of structure in zebra finch song. J Comp Physiol Psychol 93:268-277.
45. Pye A, Collins P (1991) Interaction between sound and gentamicin: immediate threshold and stereociliary changes. Hear Res 25:381-390.
46. Rebillard G, Rubel EW (1981) Electrophysiological study of the maturation of auditory responses from the inner ear of the chick. Brain Res 229:15-23.
47. Rubel EW, Lippe W, Ryals BM (1984) Development of the place principle. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 93:609-615.
48. Ryals BM, Rubel EW (1982) Patterns of hair cell loss in chick basilar papilla after intense auditory stimulation. Frequency organization. Acta Otolarnygol 93:205-210.
49. Ryals BM, Rubel EW (1985) Differential susceptibility of avian hair cells to acoustic trauma. Hear Res 19:73-84.
50. Salvi RJ, Saunders SS, Hashino E, Chen L (1994) Discharge patterns of chicken cochlear ganglion neurons following kanamycin-induced hair cell loss and regeneration. J Comp Physiol [A] 174:351-369.
51. Scharff C, Nottebohm F (1991) A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning. J Neurosci 11:2896-2913.
52. Shannon RV, Zeng FG, Kamath V, Wygonski J, Ekelid M (1995) Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 270:303-304.
53. Theunissen FE, Doupe AJ (1998) Temporal and spectral sensitivity of complex auditory neurons in the nucleus HVc of male zebra finches. J Neurosci 18:3786-3802.
54. Tucci DL, Rubel EW (1990) Physiologic status of regenerated hair cells in the avian inner ear following aminoglycoside ototoxicity. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 103:443-450.
55. Vago P, Humbert G, Lenoir M (1998) Amikacin intoxication induces apoptosis and cell proliferation in rat organ of Corti. NeuroReport 9:431-436.
56. von Békésy G (1960) Experiments in hearing (Wever EG, translator). New York: Mcgraw Hill.
57. Wiley RH, Richards DG (1978) Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav Ecol Sociohiol 3:69-94.
58. Woolley SMN, Rubel EW (1997) Bengalese finches Lonchura Striata Domestica depend upon auditory feedback for the maintenance of adult song. J Neurosci 17:6380-6390.