United States – Anti-Dumping Act of 1916 (Original Complaint by the European Communities)– Recourse to arbitration by the United States under 22.6 of the DSU, WT/DS136/ARB, 24 February 2004

World Trade Review

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 295-316

  Howse, Robert ^a   Staiger, Robert W ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645318921     PISSN: 14747456     EISSN: 14753138     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1474745605002363     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Kyle Bagwell and Robert W. Staiger, ‘An Economic Theory of GATT’, American Economic Review (March 1999)
2. Kyle Bagwell and Robert W. Staiger, The Economics of The World Trading System, MIT Press (2002)
3. Kyle Bagwell and Robert W. Staiger, ‘Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Bilateral Opportunism and the Rules of GATT/WTO’, Journal of International Economics, (May 2004)
4. Bagwell and Staiger, ‘An Economic Theory of GATT’
5. Bagwell and Staiger, The Economics of the World Trading System for a development of the notion of politically optimal tariffs.
6. L. Alan Winters, ‘Regionalism and the Rest of the World: The Irrelevance of the Kemp-Wan Theorem’, Oxford Economic Papers (1997)
7. Bagwell and Staiger, The Economics of the World Trading System.
8. Robert W. Staiger and Frank A. Wolak, ‘Measuring Industry-Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics (1994) 51–118
9. Corinne M. Krupp and Patricia S. Pollard, ‘Market Responses to Antidumping Laws: Some Evidence from the US Chemical Industry’, Canadian Journal of Economics 29(1) (February 1996) 199–227.
10. Hyun Ja Shin, ‘Possible Instances of Predatory Pricing in Recent Antidumping Cases’, in Robert Z. Lawrence (ed.), Brookings Trade Forum (1998), pp. 81–98.
11. J.H. Jackson, ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding–Misunderstanding on the Nature of Legal Obligation’, 91 American Journal of International Law, 60 (1997).
12. A.O. Sykes, ‘The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Damages or Specific Performance?’ in M. Bronckers and R. Quick (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson, The Hague: Kluwer (2000), pp. 347–357.
13. Susan Esserman and Robert Howse, ‘The WTO on Trial’, Foreign Affairs 82, no. 1 (2003): 130–40.
14. Robert Howse and Kalypso Nicolaidis, ‘Enhancing WTO Legitimacy: Constitutionalization or Global Subsidiarity?’ K. Nicolaïdis, co-author. Governance 16, no. 1 (2003): 73–94.
15. John H. Jackson, ‘Status of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: Obligation to Comply or Option to “Buy Out”?’ American Journal of International law, January 2004, 109–225.