Climate change and multiple views of fairness

Fair Weather: Equity Concerns in Climate Change

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 44-64

  Linnerooth Bayer, Joanne ^a  

^a INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069199134     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315066516-12     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Agarwal, A and Narain, S, 1991, Global warming in an unequal world, Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi
2. Bertram G, 1992, Tradable emission permits and the control of greenhouse gases, Journal of Development Studies 28:3
3. Baron, J, Gowda, R and Kunreuther, H, 1993, Attitudes toward managing hazardous waste: What should be cleaned up and who should pay for it?, Risk Analysis 13:183-192
4. Boal, M, 1997, Gore’s Greens, The Village Voice, Jan 20
5. Bodansky, D, 1993, The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A commentary, Yale Journal of International Law 18:453-558
6. Bolin, B, 1998, The Kyoto negotiations on climate change: A science perspective, Science 279:330-331
7. Bullard, R D, 1993, Waste and racism: A stacked deck? Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy Spring:29-35
8. Cline, W R, 1992, The Economics of Global Warming, Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC
9. Douglas, M, 1985, Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences Russell Sage Foundation, New York
10. Easterbrook, G, 1997, Hot air treaty, US News, Dec 22
11. Easterling, D, 1992, Fair rules for siting a high level nuclear waste repository, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 11 (3):442-475
12. Elster, J, 1992, Local justice: How institutions allocate scarce goods and necessary burdens, Russell Sage Foundation, New York
13. Epstein J and Gupta, R, 1990, Controlling the Greenhouse Effect: Five Global Regimes Compared, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC
14. Frey, B S, Oberholzer-Gee, F and Eichenberger, R, 1995, The old lady visits your backyard: A tale of morals and markets, Paper presented at the Workshop on Application of Economics, University of Chicago
15. Gerrard, M B, 1994, Whose Backyard, Whose Risk. Fear and Fairness in Toxic and Nuclear Waste Siting, MIT Press, Cambridge
16. Grubb, M J, 1990, Energy Policies and the Greenhouse Effect, Volume 1: Policy Appraisal, Royal Institute of International Affairs, London
17. Grubb, M, Sebenius, J, Magalhaes, A and Subak, S, 1992, Sharing the burden, in: I M Mintzer, ed, Confronting Climate Change. Risks, Implications and Responses, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18. Grübler, A and Fujii, Y, 1991, Intergenerational and spatial equity issues of carbon accounts, Energy 16:1397-1416
19. The Guardian, 1992, Lawrence Summers: Why the rich should pollute the poor, Feb 2, p8
20. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 1995, Equity and Social Considerations, Chapter 3, Working Group III, (lead authors: T Banuri, K Goran-Maler, M Grubb, H K Jacobson, and F Yamin), Draft 8.3
21. Johnson, A, 1998, The influence of political culture on the formation of pre-regime climate change policies in Sweden, the United States and Japan, Environmental Values 7:223-44
22. Kemp, R, 1990, Why not in my backyard? A radical interpretation of public opposition to the deep disposal of radioactive waste in the United Kingdom, Environment and Planning 22:1239-1258
23. Kukathas, C and Pettit, P, 1990, Rawls: A Theory of Justice and its Critics, Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge
24. Kunreuther, H, Kleindorfer, P, Knez, P and Yaksick, R, 1987, A compensation mechanism for siting noxious facilities: Theory and experimental design, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 14(4):371-383
25. Kunreuther, H, Fitzgerald, K and Aarts, T, 1993, Siting noxious facilities: A test of the facility siting credo, Risk Analysis 13:301-318
26. Kymlicka, W. 1990, Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction, Clarendon Press, Oxford
27. Laws, D and Susskind, L, 1991, Changing perspectives on the facility siting process, Draft paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston
28. Lidskog, R and Elander, I, 1992, Reinterpreting locational conflicts: Nimby and nuclear waste management in Sweden, Policy and Politics 20:249-264
29. Linnerooth-Bayer, J and Davy, B, 1994, Hazardous waste cleanup and facility siting in Central Europe: The Austrian case, Report to the Bundesministerium fur Wissenschaft und Forschung, IIASA Contract No 93-105, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
30. Linnerooth-Bayer, J and Fitzgerald, K, 1994, Conflicting views on fair siting procedures: evidence from Austria, Paper presented at the IIASA Conference on Fairness and Siting, May 23-24, Laxenburg, Austria
31. Linnerooth-Bayer, J and Fitzgerald, K, 1996, Conflicting views on fair siting processes, Risk: Health, Safety & Environment 7:109-119
32. Linnerooth-Bayer, J and Lófstedt, R E, 1996, Transboundary Environmental Risk Management: An Overview, Paper presented at the Conference on Transboundary Environmental Risk Management, Warsaw, 6-8 October, 1996
33. MacLean, D, 1993, Variations on fairness, Paper presented at the IIASA Conference on Risk and Fairness, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, June 20-22, Laxenburg, Austria
34. March, J G and Olsen, J P, 1989, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, Free Press, New York
35. Mitchell, R C and Carson, RT, 1986, Property rights, protest, and the siting of hazardous waste facilities, AEA Papers and Proceedings 76.285-290
36. O’Hare, M, Bacow, L, and Sanderson, D, 1983, Facility Siting and Public Opposition, Van Nostrand, New York
37. Parikh, J K, 1995, Joint implementation and North-South cooperation for climate change, International Environmental Affairs 7:22-41
38. Patt, A, 1997, Economists and Ecologists: Different Frameworks for Analyzing Global Climate Change, IIASA Interim Report, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
39. Pearce, D W; Cline, W R, Achanta, A N, Fankhauser, S, Pachauri, R K, Tol, R S J and Vellinga, P, 1996, The social costs of climate change, in: The Second Assessment Report of Working Group III, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
40. Portney, K, 1985, The potential of the theory of compensation for mitigating public opposition to hazardous waste treatment facility siting: Some evidence from five Massachusetts communities, Policy Studies Journal 14:81-89
41. Rayner, S and Cantor, R, 1987, How fair is safe enough? The cultural approach to societal technology choice, Risk Analysis 7(1):3-13
42. Rayner, S, 1994, A conceptual map of human values for climate change decision making, Paper presented at the Workshop on Equity and Social Considerations, IPCC Working Group III, Nairobi, Kenya
43. Rayner, S, 1997, Integrated climate change assessments: fairness and equity issues, an overview, Battelle, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Washington DC
44. Rayner, S and Malone, E, 1998, Human Choice and Climate Change: Ten Suggestions for Policy Makers, Battelle Memorial Institute, Washington, DC
45. Rawls, J, 1971, A theory of justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
46. Rescher, N, 1966, Distributive Justice: A Constructive Critique of the Utilitarian Theory of Distribution, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN
47. Schelling, T C, 1994, Intergenerational discounting, Energy Policy 23:23-32
48. Schelling, T C, 1998, Costs and benefits of greenhouse reduction, Issues in Science and Technology, forthcoming
49. Schwarz, M and Thompson, M, 1990, Divided We Stand, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
50. Shue, H, 1993, Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions, Law and Policy 15:1
51. Solomon, B D and Ahuja, D R, 1991, International reductions of greenhouse-gas emissions: An equitable and efficient approach, Global Environmental Change 1:5
52. Thompson, M, Ellis, R and Wildavsky, A, 1990, Cultural Theory, Westview Press, Boulder, CO
53. Thompson, M, 1994, Unsiteability: What should it tell us?, Risk: Health Safety & Environment 7:169-179
54. Tumulty, K, 1997, A treaty meets a sour congress, Time, 150:26
55. Van Well, L, 1997, Process and substance: theories of justice and the global climate change debate, draft paper, The Swedish Institute of International Affairs, Stockholm
56. Victor, D G, 1999, The regulation of greenhouse gases - Does fairness matter?, (Chapter 12 of this book)
57. Welsh, H, 1993, A C02 agreement proposal with flexible quotas, Energy Policy 220uly)
58. Wilson, J, 1992, The moral sense, American Political Science Review 87(1): 1-11
59. World Energy Council, 1997, COP-3 to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol, World Energy Council, London
60. Yellen, J, 1998, Report given to the U S House Commerce Subcommittee, Reuters Young, P, 1994, Equity in Theory and Practice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
61. Zemanek, K, 1992, State responsibility and liability, environmental protection and international law, in: W Lang, H Neuhold, and K Zemanek, eds, Graham and Trotman, UK