Numerical simulations to assess the monitoring zone achieved during low-flow purging and sampling

Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 44-52

  Varljen, Mark D ^a   Barcelona, Michael J ^a   Obereiner, James ^a   Kaminski, David ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; IMPURITIES; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; MONITORING; PUMPS; PURGING; SAMPLING;

AQUIFER HETEROGENEITIES; DETECTION MONITORING APPROACH; FLOW RATES; POTENTIAL CONCENTRATION; PUMP PLACEMENT;

GROUNDWATER FLOW;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GROUNDWATER FLOW; IMPURITIES; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; MONITORING; PUMPS; PURGING; SAMPLING;

GROUNDWATER FLOW; NUMERICAL MODEL; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

EID: 33645309635     PISSN: 10693629     EISSN: 17456592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2006.00029.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barcelona MJ. HA. Wehrmann and MD. Varljen 1994 Reproducible well purging procedures and VOC stabilization criteria for ground water sampling Ground Water 32 no 1 12 22
2. Chiang W-H. and W. Kinzelbach 2001 3D-groundwater modeling with PMWIN: A simulation system for modeling groundwater flow and pollution Berlin, New York Springer
3. Cohen RM. and RR. Rabold 1988 Simulation of sampling and hydraulic tests to assess a hybrid monitoring well design Ground Water Monitoring Review 3 no 1 51 59
4. Elci A. FJ. Molz III. and WR. Waldrop 2001 Implications of observed and simulated ambient flow in monitoring wells Ground Water 39 no 6 853 862
5. Gibs J. GA. Brown KS. Turner CL. MacLeod JC. Jelinski and SA. Koehnlein 1993 Effects of small-scale vertical variations in well-screen inflow rates and concentrations of organic compounds on the collection of representative ground water quality samples Ground Water 31 no 2 201 208
6. Gibs J. Z. Szabo T. Ivahnenko and FD. Wilde 2000 Change in field turbidity and trace element concentrations during well purging Ground Water 38 no 4 577 588
7. Hutchins SR. and SD. Acree 2000 Ground water sampling bias observed in shallow, conventional wells Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 20 no 1 86 93
8. Keely JF. and K. Boateng 1987 Monitoring well installation, purging, and sampling techniques - Part 1: Conceptualizations Ground Water 25 no 3 300 313
9. Martin-Hayden J. 2000a Sample concentration response to laminar wellbore flow: Implications for groundwater data variability Ground Water 38 no 1 12 19
10. Martin-Hayden J. 2000b Controlled laboratory investigations of wellbore concentration response to pumping Ground Water 38 no 1 121 128
11. Martin-Hayden J. and GA. Robbins 1997 Plume distortion and apparent attenuation due to concentration averaging in monitoring wells Ground Water 35 no 2 339 346
12. McDonald MG. and AW. Harbaugh 1998 A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground water flow model USGS Open-File Report 83-875 U.S. Geological Survey Denver, Colorado
13. Pollock DW. 1989 MODPATH, documentation of computer codes to compute and display pathlines using results from the U.S. Geological Survey modular three-dimensional finite-difference groundwater model U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 89-381 U.S. Geological Survey Reston, VA
14. Pollock DW. 1988 Semianalytical computation of path lines for finite difference models Ground Water 26 no 6 743 750
15. Puls RW. and MJ. Barcelona 1995 Low-flow groundwater sampling procedures
16. Puls RW. DA. Clark B. Bledsoe RM. Powell and CJ. Paul 1992 Metals in ground water: Sampling artifacts and reproducibility Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials 9 no 2 149 162
17. Puls RW. and CJ. Paul 1998 Discrete-level ground-water monitoring system for containment and remedial performance assessment objectives Journal of Environmental Engineering 124 no 6 549 553
18. Reilly TE. OL. Franke and GD. Bennett 1989 Bias in groundwater samples caused by wellbore flow Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 115 no 2 270 276
19. Reilly TE. and J. Gibs 1993 Effects of physical and chemical heterogeneity on water quality samples obtained from wells Ground Water 31 no 5 805 813
20. Reilly TE. and DR. LeBlanc 1998 Experimental evaluation of factors affecting temporal variability of water samples obtained from long-screened wells Ground Water 36 no 4 566 576
21. Schilling K. 1995 Low-flow purging reduces management of contaminated groundwater Environmental Protection 6 no 12 24 26
22. Shanklin DE. WC. Sidle and ME. Ferguson 1995 Micro-purge low-flow sampling of uranium contaminated ground water at the Fernald Environmental Management Project Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation 15 no 3 168 176