Comparison of disc damage likelihood scale, cup to disc ratio, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in the diagnosis of glaucoma

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 437-441

  Danesh Meyer, Helen V ^a   Gaskin, B J ^a   Jayusundera, T ^a   Donaldson, M ^a   Gamble, G D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HEIDELBERG RETINA TOMOGRAPH; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPTIC DISK CUP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SLIT LAMP; STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC DISK; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33645290939     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.077131     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Armaly M. Genetic determination of cup/disk ratio of the optic nerve. Arch Ophthalmol 1967;78:35-43.
2. Armaly M, Sayeghi R. The cup/disk ratio. Arch Ophthalmol 1969;82:191-6.
3. Douglas G, Drance S, Schulzer M. A correlation of fields and disks in open angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 1974;9:391-8.
4. Hart WJ, Yablonski M, Kass M, et al. Multivariate analysis of the risk of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1979;97:1455-8.
5. Kirsch RE, Anderson DR. Clinical recognition of glaucomatous cupping. Am J Ophthalmol 1973;75:442-54.
6. Quigley HA II. Changes in the appearance of the optic disc. Surv Ophthalmol 1985;30:117-26.
7. Caprioli J. Discrimination between normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1992;33153-9.
8. Jonas JB, Schmidt AM, Müller-Bergh JA, et al. Human optic nerve fiber count and optic disc size. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:2012-18.
9. Quigley HA, Coleman AL, Dorman-Pease ME. Larger optic nerve heads have more nerve fibers in normal monkey eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1441-3.
10. Bayer A, Harasymowycz P, Henderer JD, et al. Validity of a new disk grading scale for estimating glaucomatous damage: correlation with visual field damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:758-763.
11. Henderer JD, Liu C, Kesen M, et al. Reliability of the disk damage likelihood scale. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:44-8.
12. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1557-63.
13. Hodapp E, Parish R, Anderson D. Clinical decision in glaucoma. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1993:11-63.
14. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach 1988. Biometrics, 44:837-45.
15. Jonas JB, Zach FM, Gusek GC, et al. Pseudoglaucomatous physiologic large cups. Am J Ophthalmol, 1989; 107: 137-44.
16. Heijl A, Molder H. Optic disc diameter influences the ability to detect glaucomatous disc damage. Acto Opthalmol 1993;71:122-9.
17. Caprioli J, Miller JM. Correlation of structure and function in glaucoma. Quantitative measurements of disc and field. Ophthalmology 1988;95:723-7.
18. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Fontana L, et al. Identifying early glaucomatous changes. Comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology 2000;107:2272-7.
19. Chauhan BC, LeBlanc RP, McCormick TA, et al. Test-Retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 1994;118:9-15.
20. Rohrschneider K, Burk RO, Kruse FE, et al. Reproducibility of the optic nerve head topography with a new laser tomographic scanning device. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1044-9.
21. Zeyen TG, Caprioli J. Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:62-5.
22. Jonas JB, Grundler AE. Correlation between mean visual field loss and morphometric optic disk variables in the open-angle glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol 1997;124:488-97.
23. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR, et al. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. II. The site of injury and susceptibility to damage. Arch Ophthalmol 1981;99:635-49.
24. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, et al. Numbers of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same person. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:741-8.
25. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmology 1989;107:453-64.
26. Harwerth RS, Quigley HA. Visual field defects and retinal ganglion cell losses in human glaucoma patients. Arch Ophthalmol (accepted for publication).
27. Correnti AJ, Wollstein G, Price LL, et al. Comparison of optic nerve head assessment with a digital stereoscopic camera (Discam), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and stereophotography. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1499-505.
28. Kesen MR, Spaeth GL, Henderer JD, et al. The Heidelberg Retina Tomograph vs clinical impression in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:613-16.