Comparison of optic nerve head assessment with a digital stereoscopic camera (Discam), scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, and stereophotography

Ophthalmology

Volumn 110, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 1499-1505

  Correnti, Anthony J ^b   Wollstein, Gadi ^b   Price, Lori Lyn ^b   Schuman, Joel S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DEVICE; DIGITAL STEREOSCOPIC CAMERA; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPTIC NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROC CURVE; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SLIT LAMP; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STEREOPHOTOGRAPHY; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 0042029519     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00496-2     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Chronic human glaucoma causing selectively greater loss of large optic nerve fibers. Ophthalmology 1988;95:357-63.
2. Sommer A, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Clinically detectable nerve fiber atrophy precedes the onset of glaucomatous field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:77-83.
3. Zeyen TG, Caprioli J. Progression of disc and field damage in early glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:62-5.
4. Airaksinen PJ, Drance SM, Douglas GR, et al. Neuroretinal rim areas and visual field indices in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1985;99:107-10.
5. Caprioli J, Miller JM. Correlation of structure and function in glaucoma. Quantitative measurements of disc and field. Ophthalmology 1988;95:723-7.
6. Lichter PR. Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1976;74:532-72.
7. Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurements of optic disc characteristics. Ophthalmology 1988;95:350-6.
8. Shuttleworth GN, Khong CH, Diamond JP. A new digital optic disc stereo camera: intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of optic disc measurements. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:403-7.
9. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-8.
10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
11. Varma R, Spaeth GL, Steinmann WC, et al. Agreement between clinicians and an image analyzer in estimating cup-to-disc ratios. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:526-9.
12. Hatch WV, Trope GE, Buys YM, et al. Agreement in assessing glaucomatous discs in a clinical teaching setting with stereoscopic disc photographs, planimetry, and laser scanning tomography. J Glaucoma 1999;8:99-104.
13. Sung VC, Bhan A, Vernon SA. Agreement in assessing optic discs with a digital stereoscopic optic disc camera (Discam) and Heidelberg retina tomograph. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:196-202.
14. Azuara-Blanco A, Spaeth GL, Nicholl J, et al. Comparison between laser scanning tomography and computerised image analysis of the optic disc. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:295-8.
15. Ikram MK, Borger PH, Assink JJM, et al. Comparing ophthalmoscopy, slide viewing, and semiautomated systems in optic disc morphometry. Ophthalmology 2002;109:486-93.
16. Jonas JB, Mardin CY, Grundler AE. Comparison of measurements of neuroretinal rim area between confocal laser scanning tomography and planimetry of photographs. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:362-6.
17. Mikelberg FS, Parfitt CM, Swindale NV, et al. Ability of the c Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma 1995;4:242-7.
18. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Identification of early glaucoma cases with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1557-63.