-
1
-
-
0035205509
-
Statistical significance versus clinical relevance in cardiovascular medicine
-
Willenheimer R. Statistical significance versus clinical relevance in cardiovascular medicine. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2001;44:155-67.
-
(2001)
Prog Cardiovasc Dis
, vol.44
, pp. 155-167
-
-
Willenheimer, R.1
-
2
-
-
0024540990
-
Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents
-
Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 1989;95 (2 Suppl):2S-4S.
-
(1989)
Chest
, vol.95
, Issue.2 SUPPL.
-
-
Sackett, D.L.1
-
3
-
-
0031109963
-
On evidence embellishment and efficacy
-
Morgan WK. On evidence embellishment and efficacy. J Eval Clin Pract 1997;3:117-22.
-
(1997)
J Eval Clin Pract
, vol.3
, pp. 117-122
-
-
Morgan, W.K.1
-
4
-
-
0029115472
-
Should we be performing more randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical operations?
-
Solomon MJ, McLoud RS. Should we be performing more randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical operations? Surgery 1995;118:459-67.
-
(1995)
Surgery
, vol.118
, pp. 459-467
-
-
Solomon, M.J.1
McLoud, R.S.2
-
5
-
-
27144455789
-
Recruiting patients to medical research. Double blind randomised trial of 'Opt in' versus 'opt out' strategies
-
Jungajns C, Feder G, Hemmingway H, Timmis A, Jones M. Recruiting patients to medical research. Double blind randomised trial of 'Opt in' versus 'opt out' strategies. BMJ 2005;331:940-2.
-
(2005)
BMJ
, vol.331
, pp. 940-942
-
-
Jungajns, C.1
Feder, G.2
Hemmingway, H.3
Timmis, A.4
Jones, M.5
-
6
-
-
4544298467
-
Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR Trial 1), 30 day operative day mortality results: Randomised controlled trial
-
EVAR trial participants
-
Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG; EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR Trial 1), 30 day operative day mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:843-5.
-
(2004)
Lancet
, vol.364
, pp. 843-845
-
-
Greenhalgh, R.M.1
Brown, L.C.2
Kwong, G.P.3
Powell, J.T.4
Thompson, S.G.5
-
7
-
-
84993746135
-
Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR Trial 1): Randomised controlled trial
-
EVAR trial participants
-
EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR Trial 1): Randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:2179-86.
-
(2005)
Lancet
, vol.365
, pp. 2179-2186
-
-
-
8
-
-
5344261145
-
A randomised trial comparing conventional endovascular repair in abdominal aortic aneurysm
-
Prinssen M, Verhoeven E, Buth J, Cuypers PW, van Sambeek MR, Balm R et al. A randomised trial comparing conventional endovascular repair in abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med 2004;351: 1607-18.
-
(2004)
N Engl J Med
, vol.351
, pp. 1607-1618
-
-
Prinssen, M.1
Verhoeven, E.2
Buth, J.3
Cuypers, P.W.4
van Sambeek, M.R.5
Balm, R.6
-
9
-
-
20344381834
-
Two year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal annie aneurysms
-
Blankensteijn J, Sjors F, de Jong MD, van der Ham AC, Buth J, van Sterkenburg SM et al. Two year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal annie aneurysms. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2398-405.
-
(2005)
N Engl J Med
, vol.352
, pp. 2398-2405
-
-
Blankensteijn, J.1
Sjors, F.2
de Jong, M.D.3
van der Ham, A.C.4
Buth, J.5
van Sterkenburg, S.M.6
-
10
-
-
20744453113
-
Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal annie aneurysm (EVAR Trial 2): Randomised controlled trial
-
EVAR trial participants
-
EVAR trial participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal annie aneurysm (EVAR Trial 2): Randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:2187-92.
-
(2005)
Lancet
, vol.365
, pp. 2187-2192
-
-
|