Vascular complications with newer generations of angioseal vascular closure devices

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-74

  Applegate, Robert J ^a   Sacrinty, Matthew ^a   Kutcher, Michael A ^a   Gandhi, Sanjay K ^a   Baki, Talal T ^a   Santos, Renato M ^a   Little, William C ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABCIXIMAB; CEFALEXIN; CLOPIDOGREL; EPTIFIBATIDE; FIBRINOGEN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST; HEPARIN; HIRULOG; PENICILLIN G; TICLOPIDINE; VANCOMYCIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPRESSION; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; VASCULAR ACCESS; VASCULAR CLOSURE DEVICE; VASCULAR DISEASE;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEMOSTATIC TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33645277116     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2006.00107.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baim DS Knopf WD Hinohara T et al. Suture-mediated closure of the femoral access site after cardiac catheterization: Results of the suture to ambulate aNd discharge (STAND I and STAND II) trials. Am J Cardiol 2000 85 864 869.
2. Brown CL III. Freschi LA Blincoe WA et al. A prospective, randomized trial and cost-effectiveness study of the VasoSeal collagen plus vs. manual arterial pressure in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Circulation 1997 96 Suppl. 8 I 618.
3. Condon JV Jr. Elsner GB Nootens MT et al. Comparison of hemostasis time and vascular complications between the angio-seal hemostatic puncture closure device and manual pressure. Circulation 1995 92 Suppl. 8 I 599.
4. de Swart H Dijkman L Van Ommen V et al. The hemostatic puncture closure device shortens time to hemostasis and ambulation after arterial catheterization: Results of a randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994 24 Suppl. 355A.
5. Magosaki N Hosoda S Kawagishi N et al. Efficacy of hemostatic puncture closing device for hemostasis and early ambulation after coronary angiography and angioplasty: Results of a multicenter trial. J Cardiol 1999 34 131 138.
6. Sanborn TA Gibbs HH Brinker JA et al. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993 22 1273 1279.
7. Schrader R Steinbacher S Burger W et al. Collagen application for sealing of arterial puncture sites in comparison to pressure dressing: A randomized trial. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992 27 298 302.
8. Zhang Z Mahoney EM Gershony G et al. Impact of the Duett sealing device on quality of life and hospitalization costs for coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: Results from the study of economic and quality of life substudy of the SEAL trial. Am Heart J 2001 142 982 988.
9. Aker UT Kensey KR Heuser RR et al. Immediate arterial hemostasis after cardiac catheterization: Initial experience with a new puncture closure device. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994 31 228 232.
10. Applegate RJ Grabarczyk MA Little WC et al. Vascular closure devices in patients treated with anticoagulation and IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors during percutaneous revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002 40 78 83.
11. Brachmann J Ansah M Kosinski EJ et al. Improved clinical effectiveness with a collagen vascular hemostasis device for shortened immobilization time following diagnostic angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1998 81 1502 1505.
12. Dangas G Mehran R Kokolis S et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001 38 638 641.
13. Duffin DC Muhlestein JB Allison SB et al. Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: A comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compressions and two different vascular closure devices. J Invasive Cardiol 2001 13 354 362.
14. Resnic FS Blake GJ Ohno-Machado L et al. Vascular closure devices and the risk of vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors. Am J Cardiol 2001 88 493 496.
15. Koreny M Riedmuller E Nikfardjam M et al. Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004 291 350 357.
16. Nikolsky E Mehran R Halkin A et al. Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004 44 1200 1209.
17. Lasic Z Mehran R Dangas G et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy between first and second generation of Angio-seal closure devices in interventional patients. J Invasive Cardiol 2004 16 356 358.
18. American College of Cardiology Website. American College of Cardiology - National Cardiovascular Data Registry Module Version 3.0. American College of Cardiology. Available at http://www.acc.org/ncdr/pdfs/download_3_0dataonly.pdf 2003.
19. Parsons LS. Reducing Bias in a Propensity Score Matched-Pair Sample Using Greedy Matching Techniques. Cary NC SAS Institute 2001.
20. Applegate RJ. The Angio-seal device: The internal fixation of external collagen closure devices is an increasingly popular means of vascular closure. Endovasc Today 2003 2 54 55.
21. Slaughter PMP Chetty R Flintoft VF et al. A single center randomized trial assessing use of a vascular hemostasis device vs. conventional manual compression following PTCA: What are the potential resource savings? Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995 34 210 214.
22. Tavris DR Gallauresi BA Lin B et al. Risk of local adverse events following cardiac catheterization by hemostasis device use and gender. J Invasive Cardiol 2004 16 459 464.