Managers as knowledge generators: The nature of practitioner-scholar research in the nonprofit sector

Nonprofit Management and Leadership

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 129-150

  Salipante, Paul ^a,b   Aram, John D ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645267008     PISSN: 10486682     EISSN: 15427854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nml.26     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aram, J. D., and Salipante, P., “Bridging Scholarship in Management: Epistemological Reflections.” British Journal of Management, forthcoming.
2. Argyris, C., and Schön, D. A., Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1978.
3. Becher, T., Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Bristol, Pa.: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, 1989.
4. Black, F., and Scholes, M., “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy, 1973, 81, 637-654.
5. Boyer, E. L., Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press and Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990.
6. Breyer, J. M., and Trice, H. M., “The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 1982, 27, 591-622.
7. Coase, R. H., “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, 3, 1-44.
8. Feeney, S., “Introduction to Symposium: Authority, Legitimacy, Voice and the Scholar-Practice Question.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2000, 29 (1), 5-10.
9. Garvey, T., “Parental Choice of Elementary Schools Within the Cleveland Catholic Diocese and Its Implications for the Financial Policies ofDiocesan Schools.” Unpublished applied research project for the executive doctor of management degree, Case Western Reserve University, 1999.
10. Gibbons, M., and others. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1994.
11. Hodgkinson, G. P., (ed.). “Facing the Future: The Nature and Purpose of Management Research Re-Assessed.” British Journal of Management, 2001, 12 (5), S1-S80.
12. Huff, A. S., “Changes in Organizational Knowledge Production.” Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25, 288-293.
13. Klein, J. T., Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1996.
14. Kolb, D. A., Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1984.
15. Kuhn, S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (2nd rev. ed.)Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
16. Laidlaw, W. K., “Collaboration and Competition in Management Education and Development: Threat or Opportunity?" Unpublished applied research project for the executive doctor of management degree, CaseWestern Reserve University, 1999.
17. Lattuca, L. R., Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching Among College and University Faculty. Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt University Press, 2001.
18. Lave, J., “The Practice of Learning.” In S.Chaiklin and J.Lave (eds.), Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
19. Lave, J., and Wenger, E., Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
20. Lewin, K., “The Research Center for Group Dynamics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.” Sociometry, 1945, 8, 126-136.
21. Madhaven, R., and Grover, R., “From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management.” Journal of Marketing, 1998, 62, 1-12.
22. Menon, A., and Varadarajan, P. R., “A Model of Marketing Knowledge Use Within Firms.” Journal of Marketing, 1992, 56, 53-71.
23. Milofsky, C., “Transparent Research.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2000, 29 (1), 61-80.
24. Palmer, C. L., Work at the Boundaries of Science: Information and Interdisciplinary Research Process. Norwood, Mass.: Kluwer, 2001.
25. Pettigrew, A. M., “Management Research After Modernism.” British Journal of Management, 2001, 12, S61-S70.
26. Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., and Daft, R. L., “Special Research Forum: Knowledge Transfer Between Academics and Practitioners.” Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44 (2), 340-355.
27. Schön, D. A., “The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology.” Change, Nov.-Dec. 1995, pp. 27-34.
28. Sharpe, W. F., “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk.” Journal of Finance, 1964, 19, 425-442.
29. Srivastava, P., “Rigor and Practical Usefulness of Research in Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal, 1987, 8, 77-92.
30. Thomas, K. W., and Tymon, W. G., “Necessary Properties of Relevant Research: Lessons from Recent Criticisms of the Organization Sciences.” Academy of Management Review, 1982, 7, 345-352.
31. Tranfield, D., and Starkey, K., “The Nature, Social Organization and Promotion of Management Research: Towards Policy.” British Journal of Management, 1998, 9, 341-353.
32. Van Maanen, J., “Style as Theory.” Organization Science, 1995, 6, 133-143.
33. Van Til, J., “Executive Education: What Pracademics Can Teach Nonprofit Leaders.” Nonprofit Times, Mar. 2000, pp. 10-11.
34. Williams, L., “Strategic Alliance Decisions: The Interpersonal Experience of Alliance Building.” Unpublished applied research project for the executive doctor of management degree, Case Western Reserve University, 2000.
35. Womack, J. P., and Roos, D., The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production. New York: HarperCollins, 1991.