Assessing faculty performance for merit: An academic accomplishment index

Journalism and Mass Communication Educator

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 239-250

  Adams, Jonathan ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645229828     PISSN: 10776958     EISSN: 21614326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/107769580305800303     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Katrina Meyer, “Faculty Workload Studies: Perspectives, Needs, and Future Directions,” Higher Education Reports 26, no. 1 (1998): 1-101.
2. James S. Fairweather, “The Mythologies of Faculty Productivity: Implication for Institutional Policy and Decision Making,” The Chronicle of Higher Education 73, no. 1 (January/ February 2002): 15-28.
3. William G. Teirney and Estela M. Bensimon, Community and Socialization in Academe (New York: State University of New York Press, 1996).
4. F. William and A. Wilger, “Improving Productivity,” Change 27 (July/August 1995): 10-20.
5. David W. Leslie, “Resolving the Dispute: Teaching is Academe’s Core Value,” The Chronicle of Higher Education 73, no. 1 (January/February 2002): 28-44.
6. Michael F. Middaugh, Understanding Faculty Productivity (CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2001).
7. Peter J. Bukalsky, “Guide to Faculty Advancement: Annual Evaluation, Promotion and Tenure,” University Film and Video Association Monograph 7 (IL: Southern Illinois University, 2000).
8. Kenneth C. Green, “eCommerce Comes Slowly to the Campus,” The Campus Computing Project, 2001 Report (CA: Claremont Graduate University, Center for Educational Studies).
9. Kenneth C. Green, “The Continuing Challenge of Instructional Integration and User Support,” The Campus Computing Project, 1999 Report (CA: Claremont Graduate University, Center for Educational Studies).
10. N.E. Seminoff and S.B. Wepner, 'What Should We Know about Technology-Based Projects for Tenure and Promotion?” Journal of Research in Computing in Education, 30, no.1 (1997): 67-82.
11. Jeffery R. Young, “Ever So Slowly, Colleges Start to Count Work with Technology in Tenure Decisions,” The Chronicle of Higher Education 48, 22 February 2002, (23 August 2002).
12. Denise K. Magner, "Report Says Standards Used to Evaluate Research Should Also be Used for Teaching and Service,” The Chronicle of Higher Education 44, 5 September 1997, (23 August 2002).
13. Allen L. Edwards, Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction (NY; Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc., 1957).
14. Sarah Carr, “Union Publishes Guide Citing High Cost of Distance Education,” Chronicle of Higher Education 47, 11 May 2001, (28 August 2002).
15. A.J. Visser, “Faculty Work in Developing and Teaching Web-Based Distance Course: A Case Study of Time and Effort,” American Journal of Distance Education 4, no. 3 (2000): 21-32.
16. L. Guernsey, “Scholars Who Work with Technology Fear They Suffer in Tenure Reviews,” The Chronicle of Higher Education 43, no. 39 (1997): A21-A22.
17. L.C. Hattendorf Westney, “A Trivial Pursuit? Information Technology and the Tenure Track,” Campus-Wide Information Systems 17, no. 4. (2000): 113-119.