R&D competition and endogenous spillovers

Manchester School

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 40-51

  Jin, Jim Y ^a   Troege, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b ESCP EUROPE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645123803     PISSN: 14636786     EISSN: 14679957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9957.2006.00481.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Adams, J. (2000). 'Endogenous R&D Spillovers and Industrial Research Productivity', NBER Working Paper 7484.
2. Amir, R. (2000). 'Modelling Imperfectly Appropriable R&D via Spillovers', International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 18, pp. 1013-1032.
3. Amir, R. and Wooders, J. (1999). 'Effects of One-way Spillovers on Market Shares, Industry Price, Welfare, and R&D Cooperation', Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 8, pp. 223-249.
4. Amir, R. and Wooders, J. (2000). 'One-way Spillovers, Endogenous Innovator/Imitator Roles, and Research Joint Ventures', Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 1-25.
5. Amir, R., Evstigneev, I. and Wooders, J. (2003). 'Noncooperative R&D versus Cooperative R&D with Endogenous Spillover Rates', Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 42, pp. 183-207.
6. d'Aspremont, C. and Jacquemin, A. (1988). 'Cooperative and Non-cooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers', American Economic Review, Vol. 78, pp. 1133-1137.
7. de Bondt, R. (1996). 'Spillovers and Innovative Activities', International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-28.
8. Campisi, D., Mancuso, P. and Nastasi, A. (1997). 'Cost Reduction, Competitive Pressure and Firms' Optimal R&D Strategies in a Duopolistic Industry', Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 12, pp. 259-270.
9. Cheng, L. and Tao, Z. (1999). 'The Impact of Public Policies on Innovation and Imitation: the Role of R&D Technology in Growth Models', International Economic Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 187-207.
10. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1989). 'Innovation and Learning: the Two Faces of R&D', The Economic Journal, Vol. 99, pp. 569-596.
11. De Fraja, G. (1993). 'Strategic Spillovers in Patent Races', International Journal of Industrial Organisation, Vol. 11, pp. 139-146.
12. Kamien, M. and Zang, I. (2000). 'Meet Me Halfway: Research Joint Ventures and Absorptive Capacity', International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 995-1012.
13. Kanniainen, V. and Stenbacka, R. (2000). 'Endogenous Imitation and Implications for Technology Policy', Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, Vol. 156, No. 2, pp. 360-381.
14. Katsoulacos, Y. and Ulph, D. (1998). 'Endogenous Spillovers and the Performance of Research Joint Ventures', Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 333-357.
15. Kultti, K. and Takalo, T. (1998). 'R&D Spillovers and Information Exchange', Economics Letters, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 121-123.
16. Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M. and Wagner, S. (1981). 'Imitation Costs and Patents: an Empirical Study', The Economic Journal, Vol. 91, pp. 907-918.
17. Poyago-Theotoky, J. (1999). 'A Note on Endogenous Spillovers in a Non-tournament R&D', Review of Industrial Organization, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 253-262.
18. Takalo, T. (1998). 'Innovation and Imitation under Imperfect Patent Protection', Journal of Economics, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 229-241.
19. Zeng, J. (2001). 'Innovative vs. Imitative R&D and Economic Growth', Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 499-528.