Response patterns on the questionnaire on attitudes consistent with sexual offending in groups of sex offenders with intellectual disabilities

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 47-53

  Lindsay, William R ^a,b,d   Michie, Amanda M ^c   Whitefield, Elaine ^b   Martin, Victoria ^c   Grieve, Alan ^b   Carson, Derek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERTAY DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b NHS TAYSIDE   (United Kingdom)

^c NHS LOTHIAN   (United Kingdom)

^d Clinical Psychology Department   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive distortions; Intellectual disabilities; Sex offenders

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645110895     PISSN: 13602322     EISSN: 14683148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00288.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Beech A., Friendship C., Erikson M. & Hanson R. K. (2002) The relationship between static and dynamic risk factors and reconviction in a sample of UK child abusers. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment 14, 155-168.
2. Boer D. P., Tough S. & Haaven J. (2004) Assessment of risk manageability of developmentally disabled sex offenders. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 18, 275-284.
3. Broxholme S. & Lindsay W. R. (2003) Development and preliminary evaluation of a questionnaire on cognitions related to sex offending for use with individuals who have mild intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 47, 472-482.
4. Bumby K. M. (1996) Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: development and validation of the MOLEST and RAPE scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment 8, 37-54.
5. Cann J., Falshaw L. & Friendship C. (2004) Sexual offenders discharged from prison in England and Wales: a 21 year reconviction study. Legal & Criminological Psychology 9, 1-10.
6. Cohen J. (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112, 155-159.
7. Doyle D. M. (2004) The difference between sex offending and challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 29, 107-118.
8. Hanson K. R. & Harris A. J. R. (2000) Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offence recidivism. Criminal Justice & Behaviour 27, 6-35.
9. Hudson S. M., Ward T. & McCormack J. C. (1999) Offence pathways in sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 14, 779-798.
10. Hudson S. M., Wales D. S., Bakker L. & Ward T. (2002) Dynamic risk factors: the Kia Marama evaluation. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment 14, 103-120.
11. Laws D. R. (1999) Relapse prevention: the state of the art. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 14, 285-302.
12. Lindsay W. R. (2005) A model underpinning treatment for sex offenders with intellectual disability; developments on current theories of sex offending. Mental Retardation 43, 428-441.
13. Lindsay W. R. & Beail N. (2004) Risk assessment for offenders with intellectual disability: a beginning and a way forward. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 18, 229-234.
14. Lindsay W. R. & Smith A. H. W. (1998) Responses to treatment for sex offenders with intellectual disability: a comparison of men with 1 and 2 year probation sentences. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 42, 346-353.
15. Lindsay W. R. & Taylor J. L. (2005) A selective review of research on offenders with developmental disabilities: assessment and treatment. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 12, 201-214.
16. Lindsay W. R., Elliot S. F. & Astell A. (2004) Predictors of sexual offence recidivism in offenders with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 18, 299-305.
17. Lindsay W. R., Whitefield E. & Carson D. (2005) The development of a questionnaire to measure cognitive distortions in sex offenders with intellectual disability. Legal and Criminological Psychology, in press.
18. Marshall W. L. (1996) Assessment, treatment and theorising about sex offenders: developments during the past 20 years and future directions. Criminal Justice & Behaviour 23, 162-199.
19. Pithers W. D. & Gray A. S. (1996) Utility of relapse prevention in treatment of sexual abusers. Sexual Abuse. A Journal of Research & Treatment 8, 171-260.
20. Rose J., Jenkins R., O'Conner C., Jones C. & Felce D. (2002) A group treatment for men with intellectual disabilities who sexually offend or abuse. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 15, 138-150.
21. Rosnow R. & Rosenthal R. (1988) Focused tests of significance and effect size estimation in counselling psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology 35, 203-208.
22. Sturmey P. (2004) Cognitive therapy with people with intellectual disabilities: a selective review and critique. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 11, 222-231.
23. Thornton D. (2002) Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment 14, 139-153.
24. Ward T., Hudson S. M., Johnston L. & Marshall W. L. (1997) Cognitive distortions in sex offenders: an integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review 17, 479-507.