Implications of excessive precision for risk comparisons: Lessons from the past four decades

Risk Analysis

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 265-276

  Hassenzahl, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Excessive precision; Risk comparisons; Social benefit; Technological risk; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

EXCESSIVE PRECISION; RISK COMPARISONS; TECHNOLOGICAL RISK; UNCERTAINTY;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ACCURACY; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR ENERGY; NUCLEAR REACTOR; NUCLEAR SAFETY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33645107214     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00719.x     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Brown H. S. & Goble R. L. 1990 The role of scientists in risk assessment Risk: Health Safety and Environment 1 283 292
2. Thompson K. M. 2002 Variability and uncertainty meet risk management and risk communication Risk Analysis 22 3 647 654
3. National Research Council 1996 Understanding Risk Washington DC National Research Council
4. Starr C. 1969 Social benefit versus technological risk Science 165 1232 1238
5. Lofstedt R. & Frewer L. 1998 Introduction In Lofstedt R. & Frewer L. Eds The Earthscan Reader in Risk and Modern Society London Earthscan Publications Ltd London
6. Otway H. 1992 Public wisdom, expert fallibility: Toward a contextual theory of risk In Krimsky S. & Golding D. Eds Social Theories of Risk Westport CT Praeger
7. Glickman T. S. & Gough M. 1990 Readings in Risk Washington DC Resources for the Future
8. Slovic P. Fischhoff B. & Lichtenstein S. 2000 Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk In Slovic P. Ed The Perception of Risk pp 137 153 Sterling VA Earthscan
9. Otway H. & Cohen J. J. 1975 Revealed Preferences: Comments on the Starr Benefit-Risk Relationships Laxenburg Austria International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
10. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1975 Reactor Safety Study. WASH-1400 Washington DC Nuclear Regulatory Commission
11. Lewis H. W. Budnitz R. J. Kouts H. J. C. Loewenstein W. B. Rowe W. D. von Hippel F. H. & Zachariasen F. 1978 Risk Assessment Review Group Report to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NUREG/CR-0400
12. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1979 NRC Statement on Risk Assessment and Reactor Safety Study Report (WASH-1400) in Light of the Risk Assessment Review Group Report Washington DC
13. von Hippel F. 1991 Citizen Scientist New York Touchstone Press
14. Weinberg A. M. Spiewak I. Barkenbus J. N. Livingston R. S. & Phung D. L. 1985 The Second Nuclear Era: A New Start for Nuclear Power New York Praeger Scientific
15. Inhaber H. 1979 Risk with energy from conventional and nonconventional sources Science 203 718 723
16. Holdren J. P. Smith K. R. & Morris G. 1979 Energy: Calculating the risks (II) Science 204 564 568
17. Herbert J. H. Swanson C. & Reddy P. 1979 Risky business: Energy production and the Inhaber report Environment 21 6 28 33
18. Krewitt W. Hurley F. Trukenmueller A. & Rainer F. 1998 Health risks of energy systems Risk Analysis 18 4 377 384
19. Widiyanto A. Kato S. & Maruyama N. 2004 Optimizing selection of appropriate power generation systems in Indonesia by using distance based approach method Journal of Energy Resources Technology 126 1 63 71
20. Small M. J. & Fischbeck P. S. 1999 False precision in Bayesian updating with incomplete models Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 5 2 291 304
21. Inhaber H. E. 2002 Why Energy Conservation Fails Westport CT Quorum Paperback
22. Inhaber H. E. 1983 Why risk free energy isn't what it seems to be Annals of Nuclear Energy 10 3-4 177 186
23. Byrd D. M. & Cothern C. R. 2001 Introduction to Risk Analysis: A Systematic Approach to Science-Based Decision Making Rockville MD ABS Group
24. Cohen B. L. 1983 Before It's Too Late: A Scientist's Case for Nuclear Power New York Plenum Press
25. Morris R. C. 2000 The Environmental Case for Nuclear Power: Economic, Medical, and Political Considerations St. Paul MN Paragon House Press
26. Domenici P. V. Lyons B. J. & Steyn J. J. 2004 A Brighter Tomorrow: Fulfilling the Promise of Nuclear Energy Lanham MD Rowman & Littlefield
27. Wolfe B. 1995 Why environmentalists should support nuclear power Issues in Science and Technology 12 4 55 60
28. Rhodes R. & Beller D. 2000 The need for nuclear power Foreign Affairs 79 1 30 45
29. Breyer S. 1993 Breaking the Vicious Circle Cambridge MA Harvard University Press
30. Morrall J. F. 1986 A review of the record Regulation 10 3 25 34
31. Heinzerling L. 1998 Regulatory costs of mythic proportions Yale Law Review 107 1981 2070
32. McGarity T. O. 1998 A cost-benefit state Administrative Law Review 50 1 7 79
33. McGarity T. O. & Ruttenberg R. 2002 Counting the cost of health, safety, and environmental regulation Texas Law Review 80 7 1997 2057
34. Graham J. D. 1995 Written testimony of John D. Graham, Ph.D. Harvard School of Public Health: Hearings before the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee Boston MA Harvard School of Public Health
35. Tengs T. O. & Graham J. D. 1996 The opportunity costs of haphazard social investments in life-saving In Hahn R. W. Ed Risks, Costs and Lives Saved: Getting Better Results from Regulation Washington DC AEI Press
36. Tengs T. O. Adams M. E. Pliskin J. S. Safran D. G. Siegel J. E. Weinstein M. C. & Graham J. D. 1995 Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness Risk Analysis 15 3 369 390
37. ISI Web of Knowledge 2005 Available at Accessed March 3, 2005
38. Neill H. R. & Neill R. H. 2000 Transportation of transuranic nuclear waste to WIPP: A reconsideration of truck versus rail for two sites Natural Resources Journal 40 1 93 124
39. Heinzerling L. 2002 Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their misuse in the debate over regulatory reform Risk: Health, Safety and Environment 13 1/2 151 175
40. Hassenzahl D. M. 2005 The effect of uncertainty on "risk rationalizing" decisions Journal of Risk Research 8 2 119 138
41. Tengs T. O. 2005 Commentary on Hassenzahl's "The effect of uncertainty on 'risk rationalizing' decisions." Journal of Risk Research 8 2 139 144
42. Sunstein C. R. 2002 Risk and Reason: Safety, Law, and the Environment Cambridge MA Cambridge University Press
43. Goodin R. E. 1980 No moral nukes Ethics 90 3 417 449
44. Edwards G. 1982 Canada's nuclear dilemma: Part two Canadian Journal of Business Administration 13 1-2 Posted at Accessed 18 February 2005
45. Partridge E. 1980 The strange saga of the Rasmussen report Online Gadfly. Available at Accessed 8 February 2005
46. nuclearhistory.com 2004 Development of the Nuclear Power Industry. Available at Accessed 12 December 2004
47. Tillery D. 2003 Radioactive wastes and technical doubts: Genre and environmental opposition to nuclear waste sites Technical Communication Quarterly 12 4 405 421
48. Morrall J. F. 2003 Saving lives: A review of the record Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27 3 221 237
49. Heinzerling L. & Ackerman F. 2002 The humbugs of the anti-regulatory movement Cornell Law Review 87 3 648 670
50. Ackerman F. & Heinzerling L. 2004 Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the Value of Nothing New York New Press
51. Apostolakis G. E. 2004 How useful is risk assessment? Risk Analysis 24 3 515 520
52. Kammen D. M. & Hassenzahl D. M. 1999 Should We Risk It? Exploring Environmental, Health and Technological Problem Solving Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
53. Paustenbach D. J. Ed 2002 Human and Ecological Risk Assessment Theory and Practice New York Wiley Interscience
54. Wilson R. & Crouch E. A. C. 2000 Risk-Benefit Analysis Cambridge MA Harvard University Press
55. Cox L. A. 2002 Risk Analysis: Foundations, Models, and Methods Boston MA Kluver Academic Publishers
56. Vose 2000 Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide New York John Wiley and Sons
57. Cullen A. C. & Small M. J. 2004 Uncertain risks: The role and limits of quantitative assessment In McDaniels T. & Small M. Eds Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field Cambridge MA Cambridge University Press
58. Graham J. D. Johansson P. & Nakashini J. 2004 The role of efficiency in risk management In McDaniels T. & Small M. Eds Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field Cambridge MA Cambridge University Press
59. Lipsey M. W. & Wilson D. B. 2000 Practical Meta-Analysis (Applied Social Research Methods) Washington DC Sage Publications
60. Wolf F. 1986 Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis Washington DC Sage Publications
61. Rimer B. K. Briss P. A. Zeller P. K. Chan E. C. Y. & Woolf S. H. 2004 Informed decision making: What is its role in cancer screening? Cancer 5 101 Suppl. 1 1214 1228
62. Loh Y. Shlyakhter A. & Wilson R. 1997 Electromagnetic fields and the risk of leukemia and brain cancer: A summary of epidemiological literature Technology: Journal of the Franklin Institute 224A 3 21
63. Cohen J. T. & Graham J. D. 2003 A revised economic analysis of restrictions on the use of cell phones while driving Risk Analysis 23 1 5 18
64. Ha-Duong M. Casman E. A. & Morgan M. G. 2004 Bounding poorly characterized risks: A lung cancer example Risk Analysis 24 5 1071 1083
65. Finkel A. M. 1995 Toward less misleading comparisons of uncertain risks - The example of aflatoxin and alar Environmental Health Perspectives 103 4 376 385
66. Andrews C. J. Hassenzahl D. M. & Johnson B. B. 2004 Accommodating uncertainty in comparative risk Risk Analysis 24 5 1323 1335
67. von Winterfeldt D. Eppel T. Adams J. Neutra R. & DelPizzo V. 2004 Managing potential health risks from electric power lines: A decision analysis caught in controversy Risk Analysis 24 6 1487 1502
68. Evans J. S. Graham J. D. Gray G. M. & Sielken R. L. Jr. 1994 A distributional approach to characterizing low-dose cancer risk Risk Analysis 14 1 25 34
69. Kleindorfer P. R. Kunreuther H. C. & Schoemaker P. J. H. 1993 Decision Sciences an Integrative Perspective New York Cambridge University Press
70. Haimes Y. Y. 1998 Risk Modeling, Assessment and Management New York Wiley and Sons
71. Andrews C. J. 2002 Humble Analysis: The Practice of Joint Fact-Finding Westport CT Praeger Publishers
72. Florig H. K. Morgan M. G. Morgan K. M. Jenni K. E. Fischhoff B. Fischbeck P. S. & Dekay M. L. 2001 A deliberative method for ranking risks (I): Overview and test bed development Risk Analysis 21 5 913 921
73. Morgan K. M. DeKay M. L. Fischbeck P. S. Morgan M. G. Fischhoff B. & Florig H. K. 2001 A deliberative method for ranking risks (II): Evaluation of validity and agreement among risk managers Risk Analysis 21 5 923 937
74. Linkov I. & Ramadan A. Eds 2004 Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making New York Kluwer Press
75. Ezzati M. Lopez A. D. Rodgers A. & Murray C. J. L. 2004 Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors, vols. 1 and 2 Geneva Switzerland World Health Organization
76. Atomic Energy Commission 1957 Theoretical Possibilities and Consequences of Major Accidents in Large Nuclear Power Plants WASH-740 Washington DC
77. Hohenemser C. Goble R. & Slovic P. 1992 Nuclear power In Hollander J. M. Ed The Energy-Environment Connection Washington DC Island Press
78. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-4 September 17, 2003
79. Frewer L. J. Miles S. Brennan M. Kusenof S. Ness M. & Ritson C. 2002 Public preferences for informed choice under conditions of risk uncertainty: The need for effective risk communication Public Understanding of Science 11 1 10
80. Johnson B. B. & Slovic P. 1995 Presenting uncertainty in health risk assessment: Initial studies of its effects on risk perception and trust Risk Analysis 15 4 485 494
81. Williams R. A. & Thompson K. M. 2004 Integrated analysis: Combining risk and economic assessments while preserving the separation of powers Risk Analysis 24 6 1613 1623
82. Wilson R. 1979 Analyzing the daily risks of life Technology Review 81 4 41 46