Adaptive decision rules for the acquisition of nature reserves

Conservation Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 527-537

  Turner, Will R ^a   Wilcove, David S ^a,b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Complementarity; Dynamic reserve acquisition; Irreplaceability; Minimum set; Reserve design algorithms; Systematic conservation planning

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DECISION MAKING; NATURE RESERVE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIRD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; METHODOLOGY; PLANT; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; ARIZONA; BIRDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DECISION MAKING; FLORIDA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NORTHWESTERN UNITED STATES; PLANTS;

EID: 33645099297     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00333.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ando A. et al. 1998 Species distribution, land values, and efficient conservation Science 279 2126 2128
2. Ball I. R. and H. P. Possingham 2000 Marxan v1.8.2: marine reserve design using spatially explicit annealing University of Queensland Brisbane, Australia Available from accessed June 2003
3. Balmford A. et al. 2002 Economic reasons for conserving wild nature Science 297 950 953
4. Cabeza M. and A. Moilanen 2003 Site-selection algorithms and habitat loss Conservation Biology 17 1402 1413
5. Camm J. D. et al. 1996 A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection Biological Conservation 78 353 355
6. Christensen J. 2004 Second thoughts for a designer of software that aids conservation The New York Times 21 September: F2
7. Cocks K. D. and I. A. Baird 1989 Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: an example from the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia Biological Conservation 49 113 130
8. Costello C. and S. Polasky 2004 Dynamic reserve site selection Resource and Energy Economics 26 157 174
9. Csuti B. et al. 1997 A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon Biological Conservation 80 83 97
10. Drechsler M. 2005 Probabilistic approaches to scheduling reserve selection Biological Conservation 122 253 262
11. Faith D. P. et al. 2003 Complementarity, biodiversity viability analysis, and policy-based algorithms for conservation Environmental Science and Policy 6 311 328
12. Faith D. P. and P. A. Walker 1997 Regional sustainability and protected areas - biodiversity protection as part of regional integration of conservation and production Pages 271 296 in Pigram J. J. and Sundell R. C. editors National parks and protected areas: selection, delimitation and management Centre for Water Policy Research, University of New England Armidale Australia
13. Ferrier S. et al. 2000 A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement Biological Conservation 93 303 325
14. Fitzpatrick J. W. 1992 Vanishing Florida scrub Florida Naturalist 65 8 9
15. Fourer R. et al. 2002 AMPL: a modeling language for mathematical programming Brooks/Cole Pacific Grove California
16. Hof J. G. and M. Bevers 1998 Spatial optimization for managed ecosystems Columbia University Press New York
17. Hof J. G. and L. A. Joyce 1992 Spatial optimization for wildlife and timber in managed forest ecosystems Forest Science 38 489 508
18. ILOG 2001 AMPL CPLEX system Version 7.1 ILOG Mountain View California
19. Kirkpatrick J. B. 1983 An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania Biological Conservation 25 127 134
20. Margules C. R. et al. 1988 Selecting networks of reserves to maximize biological diversity Biological Conservation 43 63 76
21. Margules C. R. and R. L. Pressey 2000 Systematic conservation planning Nature 405 243 253
22. Mathworks 2004 MATLAB Version 7 Release 14 The Mathworks Natick Massachusetts
23. McDonnell M. D. et al. 2002 Mathematical methods for spatially cohesive reserve design Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 107 114
24. Meir E. et al. 2004 Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world¿ Ecology Letters 7 615 622
25. Newburn D. 2005 Economics and land-use change in prioritizing private land conservation Conservation Biology 19 1411 1420
26. Polasky S. 2000 Choosing reserve networks with incomplete species information Biological Conservation 94 1 10
27. Possingham H. et al. 2000 Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks Pages 291 305 in Ferson S. and Burgman M. editors Quantitative methods for conservation biology Springer-Verlag New York
28. Possingham H. et al. 1993 The mathematics of designing a network of protected areas for conservation Pages 536 545 in Sutton D. Cousins E. and Pearce C. editors Proceedings of the 12th Australian operations research conference University of Adelaide Adelaide
29. Pressey R. L. et al. 1994 Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal Biodiversity and Conservation 3 242 262
30. Pressey R. L. and A. O. Nicholls 1989 Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative approaches Biological Conservation 50 199 218
31. Pressey R. L. et al. 1996 Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: when does it matter and how much¿ Biological Conservation 76 259 267
32. Pressey R. L. and K. H. Taffs 2001 Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss Biological Conservation 100 355 376
33. Pressey R. L. et al. 2004 Is maximizing protection the same as minimizing loss¿ Efficiency and retention as alternative measures of the effectiveness of proposed reserves Ecology Letters 7 1035 1046
34. Sætersdal M. et al. 1993 How to maximize biological diversity in nature reserve selection: vascular plants and breeding birds in deciduous woodlands, western Norway Biological Conservation 66 131 138
35. Turner W. R. 2003 Citywide biological monitoring as a tool for ecology and conservation in urban landscapes: the case of the Tucson bird count Landscape and Urban Planning 65 149 166
36. Underhill L. G. 1994 Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms Biological Conservation 70 85 87
37. Warman L. D. et al. 2004 Sensitivity of systematic reserve selection to decisions about scale, biological data, and targets: case study from British Columbia Conservation Biology 18 655 666
38. Williams J. et al. 2004 Using mathematical optimization models to design nature reserves Frontiers in Ecology 2 98 105