Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and negative priming

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 41-48

  Read, Lenore E ^a,b   Proctor, Robert W ^a,b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442572010     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206458     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. DE JONG, R. (1995). Strategical determinants of compatibility effects with task uncertainty. Acta Psychologica, 88, 187-207.
2. DUNCAN, J. (1977). Response selection errors in spatial choice reaction tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 415-423.
3. EHRENSTEIN, A., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1998). Selecting mapping rules and responses in mixed compatibility four-choice tasks. Psychological Research, 61, 231-248.
4. HOMMEL, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 247-273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. KORNBLUM, S. (1992). Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior II(pp. 743-777). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
6. LOGAN, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523-553.
7. NEILL, W. T. (1979). Switching attention within and between categories: Evidence for intracategory inhibition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 283-290.
8. NEILL, W. T., & MATHIS, K. M. (1998). Transfer-inappropriate processing: Negative priming and related phenomena. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 38, pp. 1-44). San Diego: Academic Press.
9. NEILL, W. T., VALDES, L. A., & TERRY, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. Dempster & C. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207-261). New York: Academic Press.
10. NEILL, W. T., & WESTBERRY, R. L. (1987). Selective attention and the suppression of cognitive noise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 327-334.
11. PROCTOR, R. W., & REEVE, T. G. (1990). Research on stimulus-response compatibility: Toward a comprehensive account. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 483-494). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
12. PROCTOR, R. W., & VU, K.-P. L. (2002). Eliminating, magnifying, and reversing spatial compatibility effects with mixed location-relevant and irrelevant trials. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 443-473). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. SHIU, L.-P., & KORNBLUM, S. (1996a). Negative priming and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 510-514.
14. SHIU, L.-P., & KORNBLUM, S. (1996b). Negative priming without distractors. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society 37th Annual Meeting, 1, 63.
15. STOFFELS, E. J. (1996). On stage robustness and response selection routes: Further evidence. Acta Psychologica, 91, 67-88.
16. TAGLIABUE, M., MARTIGNAGO, N., & SIMION, F. (1996). La codifica della dimensione spaziale dello stimolo in età evolutiva: Compatibilità spaziale ed effetto Simon. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 23, 645-673.
17. TIPPER, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
18. TIPPER, S. P., & MILLIKEN, B. (1996). Distinguishing between inhibition-based and episodic retrieval-based accounts of negative priming. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual attention (pp. 337-363). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19. TIPPER, S., WEAVER, B., & HOUGHTON, G. (1994). Behavioral goals determine inhibitory mechanisms of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 809-840.