Quantitative evaluation of petal shape and picotee color pattern in lisianthus by image analysis

Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Volumn 131, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 261-266

  Yoshioka, Yosuke ^a   Ohsawa, Ryo ^a   Iwata, Hiroyoshi ^b   Ninomiya, Seishi ^b   Fukuta, Naoko ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF VEGETABLE AND TEA SCIENCE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Comparative marginal distribution; Elliptic Fourier descriptor; Eustoma grandiflorum; Principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

EUSTOMA GRANDIFLORUM;

EID: 33645057924     PISSN: 00031062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/jashs.131.2.261     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adamsen, F.J., P.J. Pinter, Jr., E.M. Barnes, R.L. LaMorte, G.W. Wall, S.W. Leavitt, and B.A. Kimball. 1999. Measuring wheat senescence with a digital camera. Crop Sci. 39:719-724.
2. Ewing, R.P. and R. Horton. 1999. Quantitative color image analysis of agronomic images. Agron. J. 91:148-153.
3. Freeman, H. 1974. Computer processing of line drawing images. Assn. Computing Machinery Computing Surveys 6:57-97.
4. Fukuta, N. and M. Nakayama. 2003. The effect of low temperature on picotee formation in Eustoma grandiflorum (in Japanese). J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 72 (2):471 (Abstr.).
5. Fukuta, N., R. Ohsawa, Y. Yoshioka, and M. Nakayama. 2005. Quantitative evaluation of the inter-varietal variation in picotee formation stability of Eustoma grandiflorum (in Japanese). Hort. Res. 4:265-269.
6. Furuta, N., S. Ninomiya, S. Takahashi, H. Ohmori, and Y. Ukai. 1995. Quantitative evaluation of soybean (Glycine max L., Merr.) leaflet shape by principal component scores based on elliptic Fourier descriptor. Breeding Sci. 45:315-320.
7. Halevy, A.H.,and A.M. Kofranek. 1984. Evaluation of lisianthus as a new crop. HortScience 19:845-847.
8. Iwata, H., H. Niikura, S. Matsuura, Y. Takano, and Y. Ukai. 1998. Evaluation of variation of root shape of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.) based on image analysis using elliptic Fourier descriptor. Euphytica 102:143-149.
9. Iwata, H. and Y. Ukai. 2002. Shape: A computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. J. Hered. 93:384-385.
10. Karcher, D.E. and M.D. Richardson. 2003. Quantifying turfgrass color using digital image analysis. Crop Sci. 43:943-951.
11. Kuhl, F.P. and C.R. Giardina. 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics Image Processing 18:236-258.
12. Lukina, E.V., M.L. Stone, and W.R. Raun. 1999. Estimating vegetation coverage in wheat using digital images. J. Plant Nutr. 22:341-350.
13. Martin, D.P. and E.P. Rybicki. 1998. Microcomputer-based quantification of maize streak virus symptoms in Zea mays. Phytopathology 88:422-427.
14. Niemira, B.A., W.W. Kirk, and J.M. Stein. 1999. Screening for late blight susceptibility in potato tubers by digital analysis of cut tuber surfaces. Plant Dis. 83:469-473.
15. Ohsawa, R., T. Tsutsumi, H. Uehara, H. Namai, and S. Ninomiya. 1998. Quantitative evaluation of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) kernel shape by elliptic Fourier descriptor. Euphytica 101:175-183.
16. Olmstead, J.W. and G.A. Lang. 2001. Assessment of severity of powdery mildew infection of sweet cherry leaves by digital image analysis. HortScience 36:107-111.
17. Olmstead, M.A., R. Wample, S. Greene, and J. Tarara. 2004. Nondestructive measurement of vegetative cover using digital image analysis. HortScience 39:55-59.
18. Purcell, L.C. 2000. Soybean canopy coverage and light interception measurements using digital imagery. Crop Sci. 40:834-837.
19. R Development Core Team. 2005. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 27 Sept. 2005. 〈http://www.r-project.org〉.
20. Richardson, M.D., D.E. Karcher, and L.C. Purcell. 2001. Quantifying turfgrass cover using digital image analysis. Crop Sci. 41:1884-1888.
21. Rohlf, F.J. and J.W. Archie. 1984. A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Ritera culicidae). Systematic Zoology 33:322-317.
22. SAS Institute. 2000. JMP statistics and graphics guide, version 4. SAS Inst., Cary, N.C.
23. Theobald, C.M., C.A. Glasbey, G.W. Horgan, and C.D. Robinson. 2004. Principal component analysis of landmarks from reversible images. Appl. Stat. 53:163-175.
24. Yoshioka, Y., H. Iwata, R. Ohsawa, and S. Ninomiya. 2004a. Analysis of petal shape variation of Primula sieboldii E. Morren by elliptic Fourier descriptors and principal component analysis. Ann. Bot. 94:657-664.
25. Yoshioka, Y., H. Iwata, R. Ohsawa, and S. Ninomiya. 2004b. Quantitative evaluation of flower colour pattern by image analysis and principal component analysis of Primula sieboldii E. Morren. Euphytica 139:179-186.
26. Yoshioka Y., H. Iwata, R. Ohsawa, and S. Ninomiya. 2005. Quantitative evaluation of the petal shape variation in Primula sieboldii caused by breeding process in the last 300 years. Heredity 94:657-663.