Focus groups as sites of influential interaction: Building communicative self-efficacy and effecting attitudinal change in discussing controversial topics

Journal of Applied Communication Research

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 115-140

  Zorn, Theodore E ^a   Roper, Juliet ^a   Broadfoot, Kirsten ^b   Weaver, C Kay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Focus Groups; Group Process; Influence; Science Communication; Self Efficacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645051978     PISSN: 00909882     EISSN: 14795752     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00909880600573965     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Aakhus, M. (2001). Technocratic and design stances toward communication expertise: How GDSS facilitators understand their work. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 341-371.
2. Allen, T. (2000). The environmental costs of genetic engineering. In R. Prebble (Ed.), Designer genes: The New Zealand guide to the issues, facts and theories about genetic engineering (pp. 61-69). Wellington, New Zealand: Dark Horse.
3. Altheide, D. L., & Johnson, J. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 485-499). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Anderson, R., Cissna, K. N., & Arnett, R. C. (Eds.). (1994). The reach of dialogue: Confirmation, voice, and community. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
5. Aronson, E. (1999). The social animal (8th ed.). New York: Worth.
6. Asch, S. E. (1965). Opinions and social pressure. In A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Small groups: Studies in social interaction (rev. ed., pp. 318-324). New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Authors (2004).
7. Baker, R., & Hinton, R. (1999). Do focus groups facilitate meaningful participation in social research? In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research; Politics, theory and practice (pp. 79-98). London: Sage.
8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
10. Barbour, R. S., & Kitzinger, J. (Eds.). (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice. London: Sage.
11. Bauer, K. M., & Orbe, M. P. (2001). Networking, coping and communicating about a medical crisis: A phenomenological inquiry of transplant recipient communication. Health Communication, 13, 141-161.
12. Bernhardt, J. M., Lariscy, R. A. W., Parrott, R. L., Silk, K. J., & Felter, E. M. (2002). Perceived barriers to Internet based health communication on human genetics. Journal of Health Communication, 7, 325-340.
13. Beston, A. (2002, August 13). Mixing 'em up out in the cow shed. New Zealand Herald, p. A11.
14. Booth-Butterfield, M., Anderson, R., & Williams, K. (2000). Perceived messages from schools regarding adolescent tobacco research. Communication Education, 49, 196-205.
15. Bormann, E. G., Bormann, E., & Harty, K. (1995). Using symbolic onvergence theory and focus group interviews to develop communication designed to stop teenage use of tobacco. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Innovations in group facilitation: Applications in natural settings (pp. 200-232). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
16. Boster, F. J., & Cruz, M. G. (2002). Persuading in the small group context. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 477-494). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Brown, T. J. (2000). Spiritual and ethical considerations. In R. Prebble (Ed.), Designer genes: The New Zealand guide to the issues, facts and theories about genetic engineering (pp. 111-117). Wellington, New Zealand: Dark Horse.
18. Burgess, J., Harrison, C., & Maiteny, P. (1991). Contested meanings: The consumption of news about nature conservation. Media, Culture and Society, 13, 499-519.
19. Calhoun, D. (2000). Who owns plants and who owns genes? In R. Prebble (Ed.), Designer genes: The New Zealand guide to the issues, facts and theories about genetic engineering (pp. 119-127). Wellington, New Zealand: Dark Horse.
20. Campbell, J. D., & Fairey, P. J. (1989). Informational and normative routes to conformity: The effect of faction size as a function of norm extremity and attention to the stimulus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 457-468.
21. Carey, M. A. (1994). The group effect in focus groups: Planning, implementing and interpreting focus group research. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 225-241). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. Milton, Australia: John Wiley & Sons Australia.
23. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Connor, S. (2003, August 26). End to man's blindness offers scientists insights. New Zealand Herald, p. B3.
25. Cooks, L. M., & Hale, C. L. (1992). A feminist approach to the empowerment of women mediators. Discourse and Society, 3, 277-300.
26. Cunningham-Burley, S., Kerr, A., & Pavis, S. (1999). Theorizing subjects and subject matter in focus group research. In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 186-199). London: Sage.
27. Derbyshire, D. (2003, June 24). Gene find offers hope for women. New Zealand Herald, p. A13.
28. Evans, D. (2000). Ethics and genetics. In R. Prebble (Ed.), Designer genes: The New Zealand guide to the issues, facts and theories about genetic engineering (pp. 27-35). Wellington, New Zealand: Dark Horse.
29. Farquhar, C., & Das, R. (1999). Are focus groups suitable for 'sensitive' topics? In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 47-63). London: Sage.
30. Fiske, J. (1990). Introduction to communication studies (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
31. Fukuyama, F. (2003). Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. London: Profile Books.
32. Gibson, M. K., & Schullery, N. M. (2000). Shifting meanings in a blue-collar worker philanthropy program. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 189-236.
33. Hacker, K. L., Goss, B., Townley, C., & Horton, V. J. (1998). Employee attitudes regarding electronic mail policies. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 422-452.
34. Hipkins, R., Stockwell, W., Bolstad, R., & Baker, R. (2002). Commonsense, trust, and science: How patterns of beliefs and attitudes to science pose challenges for effective communication. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Research, Science and Technology.
35. Ho, M.-W. (1998). Genetic engineering: Dream or nightmare? Turning the tide on the brave new world of bad science and big business. Dublin, Ireland: Gateway.
36. Hoijer, B. (1990). Studying viewers' reception of television programs: Theoretical and methodo-logical considerations. European Journal of Communication, 5, 29-56.
37. Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the art of thinking together: A pioneering approach to communicating in business and in life. New York: Currency.
38. Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1141-1151.
39. Jackson, R. L., & Heckman, S. M. (2002). Perceptions of white identity and white liability: An analysis of white student responses to a college campus racial hate crime. Journal of Communication, 52, 434-450.
40. Jones, T. S., & Bodtker, A. (1998). A dialectical analysis of a social justice process: International collaboration in South Africa. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 357-373.
41. Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16, 103-121.
42. Kitzinger, J., & Barbour, R. S. (1999). Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 1-20). London: Sage.
43. Koesten, J., Miller, K. I., & Hummert, M. L. (2002). Family communication, self-efficacy, and white female adolescents' risk behavior. Journal of Family Communication, 2, 7-27.
44. Kogan, N., & Wallach, M. A. (1967). Risky-shift phenomenon in small decision-making groups: A test of the information exchange hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 467-471.
45. Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Lederman, L. C., Stewart, L. P., Goodhart, F. W., & Laitman, L. (2003). A case against "binge" as the term of choice: Convincing college students to personalize messages about dangerous drinking. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 79-91.
47. Liebes, T., & Katz, E. (1990). The export of meaning: Cross-cultural readings of Dallas. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48. Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (1996). Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research. Journal of Communication, 46, 79-98.
49. Merton, R. K. (1987). The focused interview and focus groups: Continuities and discontinuities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 550-566.
50. Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P. L. (1956). The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
51. Meyers, R. A., & Brashers, D. E. (1999). Influence processes in group interaction. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), D. S Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Assoc. Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 288-312). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Morgan, D. L., & Spanish, M. T. (1984). Focus groups: A new tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 7, 253-270.
53. Morgan, D. L., & Spanish, M. T. (1985). Social interaction and the cognitive organisation of health-relevant knowledge. Sociology of Health and Illness, 7, 401-422.
54. Morrison, D. E. (1998). The search for a method: Focus groups and the development of mass communication research. Luton, UK: University of Luton Press.
55. Morrison, M., & Krugman, D. M. (2001). A look at mass and computer-mediated technologies: Understanding the roles of television and computers in the home. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 45, 135-161.
56. O'Hara, L. S., & Meyer, M. (2003). "I never felt more uncomfortable in my life": University students' discursive constructions of "The Lesbian Convention". Communication Studies, 54, 137-153.
57. Orbe, M. P., & Warren, K. T. (2000). Different standpoints, different realities: Race, gender, and perceptions of intercultural conflict. Communication Quarterly, 48, 51-57.
58. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
59. Riedlinger, M. E., Gallois, C., McKay, S., & Pittam, J. (2004). Impact of social group processes and functional diversity on communication in networked organizations. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 55-79.
60. Roper, J., Zorn, T. E., & Weaver, C. K. (2004). Science dialogue: The communicative properties of science and technology dialogue, Wellington: Ministry of Research, Science and Technology.
61. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms (Vol. 27). New York: Harper.
62. Skatssoon, J. (2003, August 15). Scientists grow breast in pig. New Zealand Herald, p. B3.
63. Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
64. Stiff, J. B., Dillard, J. P., Somera, L., Kim, H., & Sleight, C. (1988). Empathy, communication and prosocial behavior. Communication Monographs, 55, 198-213.
65. Stiff, J. B., & Mongeau, P. A. (2003). Persuasive communication (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
66. Sussman, S., Burton, D., Dent, C. W., Stacy, A. W., & Flay, B. R. (1991). Use of focus groups in developing an adolescent tobacco use cessation program: Collective norm effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1772-1782.
67. Tipene-Matua, B. (2000). A Maori response to the biogenetic age. In R. Prebble (Ed.), Designer genes: The New Zealand guide to the issues, facts and theories about genetic engineering (pp. 97-109). Wellington, New Zealand: Dark Horse.
68. Waterton, C., & Wynne, B. (1999). Can focus groups access community views? In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 127-143). London: Sage.
69. Wilkinson, S. (1999). How useful are focus groups in feminist research? In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice (pp. 64-78). London: Sage.
70. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.
71. Zorn, T. E. (1993). Motivation to communicate: A critical review with suggested alternatives. Communication Yearbook, 16, 515-549.