Estimating the effects of population size and type on the accuracy of genetic maps

Genetics and Molecular Biology

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 187-192

  Ferreira, Adésio ^a   da Silva, Marcia Flores ^a   da Costa e Silva, Luciano ^a   Cruz, Cosme Damião ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF VIÇOSA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Experimental populations; Mapping; Markers; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BACKCROSSING; CHROMOSOME MARKER; CODOMINANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLED HAPLOID LINE; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC LINKAGE; HYPOTHESIS; INBRED STRAIN; POPULATION SIZE; SIMULATION; VARIANCE;

EID: 33645028666     PISSN: 14154757     EISSN: 16784685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572006000100033     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ahn S and Tanksley SD (1993) Comparative linkage maps of the rice and maize genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90:7980-7984.
2. Burr B and Burr FA (1991) Recombinat inbreds for molecular mapping in maize: Theoretical and practical considerations. Trends Gent 7:55-60.
3. Burr B, Burr FA, Thompson KH, Albertson MC and Stuber CW (1988) Gene mapping with recombinant inbreds in maize. Genetics 118:519-526.
4. Cruz CD and Carneiro PCS (2003) Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético. v. 2. Editora UFV, Viçosa, 623 pp.
5. Darvasi A, Weinreb A, Minke V, Weller JI and Soller M (1993) Detecting marker-QTL linkage and estimating QTL gene effect and map location using a saturated genetic map. Genetics 134:943-951.
6. Doerge R (2002) Mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations. Nature Reviews 3:43-52.
7. GQMOL, http://www.ufv.br/dbg/gqmol/gqmol.htm.
8. Hanson WD (1959) Minimum family size for the planning of genetic experiments. Agronomy Journal 51:711-715.
9. He P, Li JZ, Zheng XW, Shen LS, Lu CF, Chen Y and Zhu LH (2001) Comparison of molecular linkage maps and agronomic trait loci between DH and RIL populations derived from the same rice cross. Crop Science 41:1240-1246.
10. Kosambi DD (1944) The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12:172-75.
11. Lander ES and Botstein D (1989) Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 121:185-199.
12. Liu HB (1998) Statistical Genomics, Linkage, Mapping and QTL Analysis. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, 611 pp.
13. Lynch M and Walsh B (1998) Genetic Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associets, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 980 pp.
14. Melchinger AE, Utz HF and Schön CC (1998) Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in estimates of QTL effects. Genetics 149:383-403.
15. Mohan M, Nair S, Bhagwat A, Krishna TG and Yano M (1997) Genome mapping, molecular markers and marker-assisted selection in crop plants. Molecular Breeding 3:87-103.
16. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Burow MD, Draye X, Elsik CG, Jiang C-X, Katsar CS, Lan TH, Lin YR, Ming R and Wright RJ (2000) Comparative genomics of plant chromosomes. The Plant Cell 12:1523-1539.
17. Soller MT, Broddy T and Genizi A (1976) On the power of experimental designs for detection of linkage between marker loci and quantitative loci in crosses between inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 47:35-39.
18. Van Ooijen JW (1992) Accuracy of mapping quantitative trait loci in autogamous species. Theor Appl Genet 84:803-811.