Interpreting socio-technical co-evolution: Applying complex adaptive systems to IS engagement

Information Technology and People

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 35-54

  Kim, Richard M ^a   Kaplan, Simon M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adaptability; Case studies; Complexity theory; Information systems; Project management

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645019108     PISSN: 09593845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09593840610700800     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ackoff, R.L. (1974), Redesigning the Future: A Systems Approach to Societal Problems, Wiley, New York, NY.
2. Alvesson, M. and Karreman, D. (2000), "Varieties of discourse: on the study of organizations through discourse analysis", Human Relations, Vol. 53 No. 9, pp. 1125-49.
3. Anderson, P. (1999), "Complexity theory and organization science", Organization Science, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 216-32.
4. Atkinson, P. and Hammersley, M. (1994), "Ethnography and participant observation", in Lincoln, Y.S. (Ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 248-61.
5. Axelrod, R. and Cohen, M.D. (2000), Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier, Basic Books, New York, NY.
6. Brown, A.D. and Jones, M.R. (1998), "Doomed to failure: narratives of inevitability and conspiracy in a failed IS project", Organization Studies, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 73-88.
7. Callon, M. and Law, J. (1982), "On interests and their transformation: enrolment and counter-enrolment", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 615-25.
8. Cooper, R.B. and Zmud, R.W. (1990), "Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach", Management Science, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 123-39.
9. Hanseth, O., Aanestad, M. and Berg, M. (2004), "Actor-network theory and information systems. What's so special?", "Guest editors' introduction", Information Technology & People, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 116-23.
10. Hong, K.-K. and Kim, Y.-G. (2002), "The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective", Information & Management, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 25-40.
11. Kaghan, W.N. and Bowker, G.C. (2001), "Out of machine age? Complexity, sociotechnical systems and actor network theory", Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 18 Nos 3/4, pp. 253-69.
12. Kaplan, S. and Seebeck, L. (2001), "Harnessing complexity in CSCW", paper presented at the 7th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2001), Bonn.
13. Kauffman, S.A. (1995), At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
14. Kilduff, M. and Mehra, A. (1997), "Postmodernism and organizational research", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 453-81.
15. Kim, R.M. and Kaplan, S.M. (2005), "Co-evolution in information systems engagement: exploration, ambiguity and the emergence of order", in gerfalk, P.J., Bannon, L. and Fitzgerald, B. (Eds), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Action in Language, Organisations and Information Systems (ALOIS*2005), Limerick, Ireland, pp. 166-80.
16. Klein, H.K. and Myers, M.D. (1999), "A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 67-88.
17. Kwon, T.H. and Zmud, R.W. (1987), "Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation", in Boland, R.J. and Hirschheim, R.A. (Eds), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 227-51.
18. Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Latour, B. (1996), Aramis or the Love of Technology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Law, J. (1992), "Notes on the theory of the actor-network: ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity", Systems Practice, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 379-93.
21. Law, J. (2003), "And if the global were small and non-coherent? Method, complexity and the Baroque", Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster, available at: www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Law- And-if-the-Global-Were-Small.pdf (accessed 21 April 2004).
22. Lewin, A.Y. and Volberda, H.W. (1999), "Prolegomena on coevolution: a framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms", Organization Science, Vol. 10 No. 5, pp. 519-34.
23. McCollum, B. (1998), "The implementation of a central timetabling system in a large British civic university", in Carter, M. (Ed.), Practice and Theory of Automated Timetabling II: 2nd International Conference, PATAT '97, Toronto, Canada, August 1997: Selected Papers, Vol. 1408/1998, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, pp. 237-53.
24. Mähring, M., Holmström, J., Keil, M. and Montealegre, R. (2004), "Trojan actor-networks and swift translation: bringing actor-network theory to IT project escalation studies", Information Technology & People, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 210-38.
25. Markus, M.L. (1983), "Power, politics, and MIS implementation", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 430-44.
26. Mintzberg, H. and Waters, J.A. (1985), "Of strategies, deliberate and emergent", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 257-72.
27. Morel, B. and Ramanujam, R. (1999), "Through the looking glass of complexity: the dynamics of organizations as adaptive and evolving systems", Organization Science, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 278-93.
28. Munir, K.A. and Jones, M.R. (2004), "Discontinuity and after: the social dynamics of technology evolution and dominance", Organization Studies, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 561-81.
29. Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J. (1991), "Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions", Information Systems Research, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1-27.
30. Pascale, R.T. (1999), "Surfing the edge of chaos", Sloan Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 3, p. 83.
31. Rittel, H.W.J. and Webber, M.M. (1973), "Dilemmas in a general theory of planning", Policy Sciences, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 155-69.
32. Robey, D., Ross, J.W. and Boudreau, M.-C. (2002), "Learning to implement enterprise systems: an exploratory study of the dialectics of change", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 17-46.
33. Sandberg, J. (2005), "How do we justify knowledge produced within interpretive approaches?", Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 41-68.
34. Seebeck, L., Kim, R.M. and Kaplan, S. (2005), "Emergent temporal behaviour and collaborative work", in Gellersen, H., Schmidt, K., Beaudouin-Lafon, M. and Mackay, W. (Eds), ECSCW 2005: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Springer, Paris, pp. 123-42.
35. Soh, C., Sia, S.K. and Tay-Yap, J. (2000), "Cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution?", Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 47-51.
36. Somers, T.M. and Nelson, K.G. (2004), "A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle", Information & Management, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 257-78.
37. Strauss, A.L. (1993), Continual Permutations of Action, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, NY.
38. Taylor, S.J. and Bogdan, R. (1998), Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, NY.
39. van Valen, L. (1973), "A new evolutionary law", Evolutionary Theory, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1-30.
40. Walsham, G. (1995a), "The emergence of interpretivism in IS research", Information Systems Research, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 376-94.
41. Walsham, G. (1995b), "Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method", European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 74-81.
42. Walsham, G. (1997), "Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects", in Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J. and DeGross, J.I. (Eds), Information Systems and Qualitative Research, Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 466-80.
43. Wright, S. (1967), "'Surfaces' of selective value", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 165-72.