Enabling semantic web inferencing with oracle technology: Applications in life sciences

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3791 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 8-16

  Stephens, Susie ^a  

^a Oracle   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); SEMANTICS; STANDARDIZATION;

COMMERCIAL SOFTWARE VENDORS; IT CHALLENGES; ORACLE (CO); SEMANTIC WEB INFERENCING;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 33645016462     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11580072_2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Alexander, N., Lopez, X., Ravada, S., Stephens, S., Wang, J. (2004) RDF Data Model in Oracle. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swls-ws/ 2004Sep/att-0054/W3C-RDF_Data_Model_in_Oracle.doc
2. Berners-Lee, T. (2005) Infrastructure Roadmap: Stack of Expressive Power. http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/0517-boit-tbl/#[27].
3. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J. Lassila, O. (2001) The Semantic Web. Scientific American. 284, 5: 34-43.
4. Boley, H., Mei, J. (2005) Interpreting SWRL Rules in RDF Graphs, WLFM 2005. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/inst/ag-nbi/research/swrlengine/SWRLinRDF.pdf
5. Boley, H., Tabet, S., Wagner, G. (2001) Design Rationale of RuleML: A Markup Language for Semantic Web Rules. SWWS. http://islab.hanyang.ac.kr/bbs/ data/cse995/DesignRationaleRuleML.pdf
6. Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, Maler, E., Yergeau, F. (2004) Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Third Edition). W3C Recommendation 04 February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-20040204/
7. Cheung, K., H., Yip, K., Y., Smith, A., deKnikker, R., Masiar A., Gerstein, M. (2005) YeastHub: a semantic web use case for integrating data in the life sciences domain. Bioinformatics 21, 185-196.
8. Clark, T., Martin, S., and Liefeld, T. (2004) Globally Distributed Object Identification for Biological Knowledgebases. Brief. Bioinformatics. 5 (1), 59-70.
9. Coles, S. J., Day, N. E., Murray-Rust, P., Rzepa, H. S., Zhang, Y. (2005) Enhancement of the Chemial Semantic Web through the use of InCHI Identifiers. Org. Biomol. Chem., 3, 1832-1834.
10. rd Int. Workshop, RuleML 2004, Hiroshima, Japan, Nov. 2004. Antoniou G., Boley, H. (Eds.) pp. 1-5.
11. DeWitte, R. (2003) Product Focused Drug Delivery. Drug Discovery July/Aguust 2003. 30-33.
12. FDA. (2004) Innovation Stagnation. Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to New Medical Products, http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/ criticalpath/whitepaper.html
13. Gardner, S. (2005) Ontologies and semantic data integration. Drug Discovery Today 10, 1001-1007.
14. Gilbert J, Henske, P., Singh, A. (2003) Rebuilding Big Pharma's Business Model. In Vivo, the Business & Medicine Report, Windhover Information, Vol. 21, No. 10, November 2003.
15. rd Int. Workshop, RuleML 2004. Hiroshima, Japan, Nov. 2004. Antoniou G., Boley, H. (Eds.) pp. 6-22.
16. Hawke, S., Tabet, S., de Sainte Marie, C. (2005) Rule Language Standardization. Report from the W3C Workshop on Rule Languages for Interoperability. http://www.w3.org/2004/12/rules-ws/report/
17. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M. (2004) SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission 21 May 2004. http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-SWRL- 20040521/
18. Lipinski, C.A., Lombarde, F., Dominy, B.W., Feeney, P.J. (1997) Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Delivery Res. 23, 3-25.
19. Luciano, J. (2005) PAX of mind for pathway researchers. Drug Discovery Today 13, 938-942.
20. Manola, F., Miller, E (2004) RDF Primer. W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/
21. McGuinness, D. L., van Harmelen, F. (2004) OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl- features/
22. Murray, C. (2005) Oracle Spatial. Resource Description Framework (RDF) 10g Release 2 (10.2). http://download-west.oracle.com/otndocs/tech/semantic_web/ pdf/rdfrm.pdf
23. Neumann, E., Miller E., Wilbanks, J. (2004) What the Semantic Web could do for the life sciences. Biosilico 2, 228-236.
24. Padhani, A. R., Ollivier, L. (2001) The RECIST criteria: implications for diagnostics radiologists. Br. J. Radiol. 74, 983-986
25. Prud'hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A. (2005) SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Working Draft 21 July 2005. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query
26. Salamone, S. (2005) Semantic Web Interest Grows. Bio-IT World (http://www.bio-itworld.com/archive/microscope/document.2005-06-16.8341855754) (2005).
27. Stephens, S., Musen, M. (2005) A novel ontology development environment for the life sciences. BioOntologies Special Interest Group, Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. http://bio-ontologies.man.ac.uk/download/ stephens_bio_ontologies_submitted.doc
28. Stephens, S., Rung, J. Lopez, X. (2004) Graph Data Representation in Oracle Database 10g: Case studies in Life Sciences. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 27, 61-67.
29. Weitzner, D. (2004) Summary Report - W3C Workshop on Semantic Web for Life Sciences, http://www.w3.org/2004/10/swls-workshop-report.html
30. Yuan, B., Latek, R., Hossbach, M., Tuschl, T., Lewitter, F. (2004) siRNA Selection Server: an automated siRNA oligonucleotide prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W130-W134.