Magnetic resonance imaging of renal disease: Recent developments and future applications

Nephron - Clinical Practice

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2006, Pages

  Fenchel, Michael ^a,b   Nael, Kambiz ^b   Herget Rosenthal, Stefan ^c   Krishnam, Mayil ^b   Ruehm, Stefan G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Kidney; Magnetic resonance angiography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Renal function; Renal perfusion

Indexed keywords

ACUTE PYELONEPHRITIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; KIDNEY ANGIOGRAPHY; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; KIDNEY BLOOD VESSEL; KIDNEY DISEASE; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY PARENCHYMA; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; KIDNEY TUMOR; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENOGRAPHY; RENOVASCULAR DISEASE; REVIEW; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; URINARY TRACT OBSTRUCTION;

FORECASTING; HUMANS; KIDNEY DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

EID: 33645004835     PISSN: 16602110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000090607     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Huang AJ, Lee VS, Rusinek H: MR imaging of renal function. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:1001-1017.
2. Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA: Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology 2004;231:365-371.
3. Riccabona M: Imaging of renal tumours in infancy and childhood. Eur Radiol 2003;13(suppl 4):L116-L129.
4. Kawashima A, LeRoy AJ: Radiologic evaluation of patients with renal infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2003;17:433-456.
5. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Nittka M, Dietrich O, Johannson LO, Reiser MF: Renal MR angiography: current debates and developments in imaging of renal artery stenosis. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2003;24:255-267.
6. Spuentrup E, Ruebben A, Stuber M, Gunther RW, Buecker A: Metallic renal artery MR imaging stent: artifact-free lumen visualization with projection and standard renal MR angiography. Radiology 2003;227:897-902.
7. Bruno S, Remuzzi G, Ruggenenti P: Transplant renal artery stenosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004;15:134-141.
8. Wilson MW, Fidelman N, Weber OM, et al: Experimental renal artery embolization in a combined MR imaging/angiographic unit. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:1169-1175.
9. Riederer SJ, Bernstein MA, Breen JF, et al: Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography with real-time fluoroscopic triggering: design specifications and technical reliability in 330 patient studies. Radiology 2000;215:584-593.
10. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA: Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345-351.
11. Low RN, Martinez AG, Steinberg SM, et al: Potential renal transplant donors: evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and MR urography. Radiology 1998;166:165-172.
12. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Bydder M: SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-962.
13. Sodickson DK, Griswold MA, Jakob PM: SMASH imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1999;7:237-254.
14. Bailes DR, Gilderdale DJ, Bydder GM, Collins AG, Firmin DN: Respiratory ordered phase encoding (ROPE): a method for reducing respiratory motion artefacts in MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9:835-838.
15. Lewis C, Prato FS, Drost DJ, Nicholson RL: Comparison of respiratory triggering and gating techniques for the removal of respiratory artifacts in MR imaging. Radiology 1986;160:803-810.
16. McConnell MV, Khasgiwala VC, Savord BJ, et al: Prospective adaptive navigator correction for breath-hold MR coronary angiography. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:148-152.
17. Danias PG, McConnell MV, Khasgiwala VC, Chuang ML, Edelman RR, Manning WJ: Prospective navigator correction of image position for coronary MR angiography. Radiology 1997;203:733-736.
18. Zech CJ, Herrmann KA, Huber A, et al: High-resolution MR-imaging of the liver with T2-weighted sequences using integrated parallel imaging: comparison of prospective motion correction and respiratory triggering. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:443-450.
19. Yamashita Y, Miyazaki T, Hatanaka Y, Takahashi M: Dynamic MRI of small renal cell carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:759-765.
20. Narumi Y, Hricak H, Presti JC, et al: MR imaging evaluation of renal carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 1997;22:216-225.
21. Rofsky NM, Bosniak MA: MR imaging in the evaluation of small (<3.0 cm) renal masses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1997;5:67-81.
22. Rofsky NM, Lee VS, Laub G, et al: Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination. Radiology 1999;212:876-848.
23. Yabuki T, Togami I, Kitagawa T, et al: MR imaging of renal cell carcinoma: associations among signal intensity, tumor enhancement, and pathologic findings. Acta Med Okayama 2003;57:179-186.
24. Ergen FB, Hussain HK, Caoili EM, et al: MRI for preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma using the 1997 TNM classification: comparison with surgical and pathologic staging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:217-225.
25. Israel GM, Bosniak MA: Renal imaging for the diagnosis and staging of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 2003;30:499-514.
26. Vasbinder GB, Maki JH, Nijenhuis RJ, et al: Motion of the distal renal artery during three-dimensional contrast-enhanced breath-hold MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:685-696.
27. Lee VS, Rofsky NM, Ton AT, Johnson G, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-enhanced phase-contrast MR imaging to measure renal artery velocity waveforms in patients with suspected renovascular hypertension. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:499-508.
28. Hahn U, Miller S, Nagele T, et al: Renal MR angiography at 1.0 T: three-dimensional phase-contrast techniques versus gadolinium-enhanced 3D fast low-angle shot breath-hold imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1501-1508.
29. Prince MR, Schoenberg SO, Ward JS, Londy FJ, Wakefield TW, Stanley JC: Hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: MR angiographic features. Radiology 1997;205:128-136.
30. Prasad PV, Priatna A: Functional imaging of the kidneys with fast MRI techniques. Eur J Radiol 1999;29:133-148.
31. Suga K, Ogasawara N, Okazaki H, Sasai K, Matsunaga N: Functional assessment of canine kidneys after acute vascular occlusion on Gd-DTPA-enhanced dynamic echo-planar MR imaging. Invest Radiol 2001;36:659-676.
32. Schoenberg SO, Bock M, Kallinowski F, Just A: Correlation of hemodynamic impact and morphologic degree of renal artery stenosis in a canine model. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:2190-2198.
33. Fang YC, Siegelman ES: Complications of renal transplantation: MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:836-842.
34. Michoux N, Montet X, Pechere A, et al: Parametric and quantitative analysis of MR renographic curves for assessing the functional behaviour of the kidney. Eur J Radiol 2005;54:124-135.
35. Michaely HJ, Schoenberg SO, Ittrich C, Dikow R, Bock M, Guenther M: Renal disease: value of functional magnetic resonance imaging with flow and perfusion measurements. Invest Radiol 2004;39:698-705.
36. Lee VS, Rusinek H, Noz ME, Lee P, Raghavan M, Kramer EL: Dynamic three-dimensional MR renography for the measurement of single kidney function: initial experience. Radiology 2003;227:289-294.
37. Dumoulin CL, Buonocore MH, Opsahl LR, et al: Noninvasive measurement of renal hemodynamic functions using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:370-378.
38. Grenier N, Trillaud H, Combe C, et al: Diagnosis of renovascular hypertension: feasibility of captopril-sensitized dynamic MR imaging and comparison with captopril scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:835-843.
39. Lumsden CJ, Silverman M, Zielinski A, et al: Vascular exchange in the kidney: regional characterization by multiple indicator tomography. Circ Res 1993;72:1172-1180.