The use of nuclear DNA molecular markers for studying speciation and systematics as exemplified by the "Lacerta agilis complex" (Sauria: Lacertidae)

Molecular Biology

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 51-62

  Grechko, V V ^a   Fedorova, L V ^a   Ryabinin, D M ^a   Ryabinina, N L ^a   Ciobanu, D G ^b   Kosushkin, S A ^a   Darevsky, I S ^c  

^a ENGELHARDT INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^b INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Moldova)

^c ZOOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Lacertidae; Lizard; Molecular evolution; Molecular systematics; Nuclear DNA markers; Reptilian genome

Indexed keywords

LACERTA; LACERTA AGILIS; LACERTA AGILIS EXIGUA; LACERTIDAE; REPTILIA; SAURIA; SQUAMATA;

EID: 33644992771     PISSN: 00268933     EISSN: 16083245     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1134/S0026893306010092     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Stewart C.-B. 1993. The powers and pittfalls of parsimony. Nature. 361, 603-607.
2. Antonov A.S. 2000. Osnovy genosistematiki rastenii (Findamentals of Plant Genosystematics). Moscow: MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica.
3. Baker R.H., Gatesy J. 2002. Is morphology still relevant? In: Molecular Systematics and Evolution: Theory and Practice. Eds. DeSalle R., Giribe G., Wheeler W. Basel: Birkhauser, pp. 163-174.
4. Molecular Systematics. Eds. Hillis D.M., Moritz C., Mable B.K., Sunderland, MA: Sinauer, 1996.
5. Tautz D., Arctander P., Minelli A., Thomas R.H., Voger A.P. 2003. A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 70-74.
6. Lee M.S.Y. 1999. Molecular phylogeny becomes functional. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 177-178.
7. Nichols R.A. 2001. Gene tree and species tree are not the same. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68, 87-112.
8. Emelyanov A.F., Rasnitsyn A.P. 1991. Systematics, Phylogeny, and Cladistics. Priroda. 7, 23-37.
9. Elder J.F., Turner B.J. 1995. Concerted evolution of repetitive DNA sequences in eukaryotes. Quant. Rev. Biol. 70, 297-320.
10. Grechko V.V. 2002. Molecular markers in phylogeny and systematics. Genetika. 39, 1527-1541.
11. Hillis D.M. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches in evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18, 23-42.
12. Avise J.C. 2004. Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution. 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
13. Brower A.V.Z., DeSalle R., Vogler A. 1996. Gene tree, species tree, and systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27, 423-450.
14. Hewitt G.M. 1999. Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68, 87-112.
15. Darevsky I.S., Shcherbak N.N., Peters T., et al. 1976. Systematics and intraspecific structure. In: Prytkaya yashcheritsa (The Sand Lizard). Ed. Yablokov A.V. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 53-68.
16. Bischoff W. 1991. Ubersicht der Arten and interarten der Familie Lacertidae. 3. Die Gattung Lacerta. In: Die Eidechse, Mittellungblatt der AG Lacertiden in der DGHT. Hefte 3. Bonn/Bremen, 5-18.
17. Kalyabina-Hauf S.A., Ananyeva N.B. 2004. Phylogeny and intraspecific structure of Lanarta agilis L. 1758 (Lanartidaa, Sauria, Reptilia), a lizard species with a broad range (experience in using the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene). Tr. Zool. Inst. Ross. Akad. Nauk. 32, 1-108.
18. Arnold E.N. 1989. Towards a phylogeny and biogeography of the Lacertidae: Relationships within an Old-World family of lizards derived from morphology. Bull. Br. Mus (Nat. Hist.) Zool. 55, 209-257.
19. Arribas O.J. 1999. Phylogeny and relationships of the mountain lizards of Europe and Near East (Archaeolacerta Mertens, 1921, sensu lato) and their relationships among the Eurasian lacertid radiation. Russ. J. Herpetol. 16, 1-22.
20. Harris D.J. 1999. Molecular systematics and evolution of lacertid lizards. Nature Croat. 8, 161-180.
21. Harris D.J., Arnold E.N., Thomas R. 1998. Relationships of lacertid lizards (Reptilia: Lacertidae) estimated from mitochondrial DNA sequences and morphology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 265, 1939-1958.
22. Kalyabina S.A., Milto K.D., Ananyeva N.B., Legal L., Joger U., Wink H. 2001. Phylogeography and systematics of Lacerta agilis based on mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequence: First results. Russ. J. Herpetol. 8, 149-158.
23. Grechko V.V., Fedorova L.V., Fedorov A.N., et al. 1997. Restriction endonuclease analysis of highly repetitive DNA as a phylogenetic tool. J. Mol. Evol. 45, 332-336.
24. Fedorov A.N., Fedorova L.V., Grechko V.V., et al. 1999. Variable and invariable DNA repeat characters revealed by taxonprint approach are useful for molecular systematics. J. Mol. Evol. 48, 69-76.
25. Ryabinina N.L., Bannikova A.A., Kosushkin S.A., et al. 2002. Estimation of the subspecies level of differentiation in Caucasian lizards of the genus Darevskia (syn. "Lacreta saxicola complex", Lacertidae, Sauria) using genome DNA markers. Russ. J. Herpetol. 9, 185-194.
26. Borodulina O.R., Kramerov D.A. 2005. PCR-based approach to SINE isolation: Simple and complex SINEs. Gene. 349, 197-205.
27. Ryabinina N.L., Grechko V.V., Darevsky I.S. 1998. DNA polymorphism detectable by RAPD analysis in populations of Lacertidae lizards. Genetika. 34, 1661-1667.
28. Ciobanu D., Grechko V.V., Darevsky I.S. 2003. Molecular evolution of NLsat satellite DNA in lizards of the genus Daravskia (Sauria: Lacertidae): Correlation with species diversity. Genetika. 39, 1527-1541.
29. Ciobanu D.G., Grechko V.V., Darevsky I.S., Kramerov D.A. 2004. New satellite DNA in Lacerta s. str. lizards (Sauria: Lacertidae): Evolutionary pathways and phylogenetic impact. J. Exp. Zool. 302B, 505-516.
30. Grechko V.V., Ciobanu D.G., Darevsky I.S., Kramerov D.A. 2005. Satellite DNA of the genus Lacerta s. str. (L. agilis group), Lacertidae. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. 400, 392-395.
31. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16, 111-120.
32. Van de Peer Y., De Wachter R. 1994. TREECON for Windows: A software package for construction and drawing of evolution trees for Microsoft Windows environment. Comput. Applic. Biosci. 10, 569-570.
33. Grechko V.V., Ryabinin D.M., Fedorov A.N., Rudykh A.I., Ryskov A.P., Semenova S.K., Darevsky I.S. 1998. Molecular genetic classification and phylogenetic relatedness of some lacertid lizard species as inferred from studies on specific distribution of restriction sites in DNA repeats (taxonprinting). Mol. Biol. 36, 172-183.
34. Fu J. 2000. Toward the phylogeny of the family Lacertidae: Why 4798 base pairs of mtDNA sequences cannot draw the picture. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 71, 203-217.
35. Ryabinin D.M., Grechko V.V., Darevsky I.S., Ryskov A.P., Semenova S.K., 1996. Comparative study of DNA repetitive sequences by means of restriction endonucleases among populations and subspecies of some lacertid lizard species. Russ. J. Herpetol. 3, 178-185.
36. Ciobanu D.G., Grechko V.V., Kramerov D.A. 2003. A new subfamily of satellite DNA, NLsatIV, in Daravskia lindhilmi lizards (Lacertidae): Structure and evolution. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. 392, 1-5.
37. Ciobanu D.G., Rudykh I.A., Ryabinina N.L., Grechko V.V., Kramerov D.A., Darevsky I.S. 2002. Reticulate evolution of parthenogenetic rock lizard species (Lacertidae): Inheritance of tandem repeats and anonymous RAPD markers. Mol. Biol. 36, 296-306.
38. Gilbert W., Labuda D. 1999. CORE-SINE: Eukaryotic short interspersed retroposone elements with common sequence motifs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96, 2869-2874.
39. Nichols R.A., Hewitt G.M. 1994. The genetic cousequencies of long distance dispersal during colonization. Heredity. 72, 312-317.