The influence of illusory motion on line bisection performance in normal subjects

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 881-888

  Choi, Kyung Mook ^a   Ku, Bon D ^b   Jeong, Yong ^c   Lee, Byung Hwa ^a   Ahn, Hyun Jung ^a   Kang, Sue J ^a   Chin, Juhee ^a   Heilman, Kenne M ^c   Na, Duk L ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Kwandong University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Induced motion; Motion aftereffect; Motion perception; Spatial neglect; Visual illusion

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL CONCENTRATION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVER BIAS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VESTIBULAR STIMULATION; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

EID: 33644906117     PISSN: 13556177     EISSN: 14697661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1355617705051039     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bisiach, E., Pizzamiglio, L., Nico, D., & Antonucci, G. (1996). Beyond unilateral neglect. Brain, 119, 851-857.
2. Bisiach, E., McIntosh, R.D., Dijkerman, H.C., McClements, K.I., Colombo, M., & Milner, A.D. (2004). Visual and tactile length matching in spatial neglect. Cortex, 40, 651-657.
3. Bowers, D. & Heilman, K.M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18, 491-498.
4. Chatterjee, A., Mennemeier, M., & Heilman, K.M. (1994). The psychophysical power law and unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition, 25, 92-107.
5. Harvey, M., Milner, A.D., & Roberts, R.C. (1995). An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the Landmark Task. Brain and Cognition, 27, 59-78.
6. Heilman, K.M., Watson, R.T., & Valenstein, E. (2003). Neglect and related disorders. In K.M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical Neuropsychology (4th ed., pp. 296-346). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Heilman, K.M. & Van Den Abell, T. (1980). Right hemisphere dominance for attention: The mechanism underlying hemispheric asymmetries of in attention (neglect). Neurology, 30, 327-330.
8. Hoffmann, M., Dorn, T.J., & Bach, M. (1999). Time course of motion adaptation: Motion-onset visual evoked potentials and subjective estimates. Vision Research, 39, 437-444.
9. Jeong, Y., Lee, B.H., Ahn, H.J., Park, K.C., Heilman, K.M., & Na, D.L. (2004). Attentional bias induced by viewing actual or illusionary movements. Neurology, 62, 1333-1337.
10. Jewell, G. & McCourt, M.E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 93-110.
11. Mattingley, J.B., Bradshaw, J.L., & Bradshaw, J.A. (1994). Horizontal visual motion modulates focal attention in left unilateral spatial neglect. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 57, 1228-1235.
12. McCourt, M.E., Garlinghouse, M., & Slater, J. (2000). Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: Focusing attention on two hypotheses. Frontiers in Bioscience, 5, 58-71.
13. Mennemeier, M., Vezey, E., Lamar, M., & Jewell, G. (2002). Crossover is not a consequence of neglect: A test of the orientation/estimation hypothesis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 107-14.
14. Milner, A.D., Brechmann, M., & Pagliarini, L. (1992). To halve and to halve not: An analysis of line bisection judgements in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 30, 515-526.
15. Milner, A.D., Harvey, M., Roberts, R.C., & Forster, S.V. (1993). Line bisection errors in visual neglect: Misguided action or size distortion? Neuropsychologia, 31, 39-49.
16. Na, D.L., Son, Y., Kim, C.H., Lee, B.H., Shon, Y.M., Lee, K.J., Lee, K.M., Adair, J.C., Watson, R.T., & Heilman, K.M. (2002). Effect of background motion on line bisection performance in normal subjects. Cortex, 38, 787-796.
17. Palmer, S.E. (1999). Vision science - photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Pizzamiglio, L., Frasca, R., Guariglia, C., Incoccia, C., & Antonucci, G. (1990). Effect of optokinetic stimulation in patient with visual neglect. Cortex, 26, 535-540.
19. Post, R.B. & Lott, L.A. (1990). Relationship of induced motion and apparent straight-ahead shifts to optokinetic stimulus velocity. Perception and psychophysics, 48, 401-406.
20. Rubens, A.B. (1985). Caloric stimulation and unilateral visual neglect. Neurology, 35, 1019-1024.
21. Shuren, J., Hartley, T., & Heilman, K.M. (1998). The effects of rotation on spatial attention. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 11, 72-75.
22. Tootell, R.B., Reppas, J.B., Dale, A.M., Look, R.B., Sereno, M.I., Malach, R., Brady, T.J., & Rosen, B.R. (1995). Visual motion after-effect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature, 375, 139-141.