Effect of background motion on line bisection performance in normal subjects

Cortex

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 787-796

  Na, Duk L ^a   Son, Youngchul ^a   Kim, Chi Hun ^a   Lee, Byung Hwa ^a   Shon, Young Min ^g   Lee, Kwang Joo ^c   Lee, Kyung Min ^b   Adair, John C ^d   Watson, Robert T ^e,f   Heilman, Kenneth M ^e,f  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Korea Education and Research Information Service   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^f VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Hemispatial neglect; Induced motion; Line bisection; Motion illusion; Optokinetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; EXPERIMENTATION; FEMALE; HEMISPATIAL NEGLECT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NEGLECT; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTOKINETIC STIMULATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; ARTICLE; LINE BISECTION PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0036908291     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70045-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Aiken BE and Loop MS. Visual reaction time of cats to different spatial frequencies. Visual Neuroscience, 5: 557-564, 1990.
2. Barrett AM, Crucian GP, Schwartz RL and Heilman KM. Adverse effect of dopamine agonist therapy in a patient with motor-intentional neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80: 600-603, 1999.
3. Bisiach E, Geminiani G, Berti A and Rusconi ML. Perceptual and premotor factors of unilateral neglect. Neurology, 40: 1278-1281, 1990.
4. Bisiach E, Pizzamiglio L, Nico D and Antonucci G. Beyond unilateral neglect. Brain, 119: 851-857, 1996.
5. Bowers D and Heilman KM. Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18: 491-498, 1980.
6. Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC, Nathan G and Wilson L. Bisecting rods and lines: Effects of horizontal and vertical posture on left-side underestimation by normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 23: 421-425, 1985.
7. Cappa S, Sterzi R, Vallar G and Bisiach E. Remission of hemineglect and anosognosia during vestibular stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 25: 775-782, 1987.
8. Fleet WS, Valenstein E, Watson RT and Heilman KM. Dopamine agonist therapy for neglect in humans. Neurology, 37: 1765-1770, 1987.
9. Galati G, Pappata S, Pantano P, Lenzi GL, Samson Y and Pizzamiglio L. Cortical control of optokinetic nystagmus in humans: A positron emission tomography study. Experimental Brain Research, 126: 149-159, 1999.
10. Grujic Z, Mapstone M, Gitelman DR, Johnson N, Weintraub S, Hays A, Kwasnica C, Harvey R and Mesulam MM. Dopamine agonists reorient visual exploration away from the neglected hemispace. Neurology, 51: 1395-1398, 1998.
11. Guariglia C, Lippolis G and Pizzamiglio L. Somatosensory stimulation improves imagery disorders in neglect. Cortex, 34: 232-241, 1998.
12. Hartley AA. Mental measurement of line length: The role of the standard. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 7: 309-317, 1981.
13. Heilman KM and Valenstein E. Mechanisms underlying hemispatial neglect. Annals of Neurology, 5: 166-170, 1979.
14. Jewell G, and McCourt ME. Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38: 93-110, 2000.
15. Karnath HO. Subjective body orientation in neglect and the interactive contribution of neck muscle proprioception and vestibular stimulation. Brain, 117: 1001-1012, 1994.
16. Karnath HO. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation and vibration of neck muscles in neglect. Experimental Brain Research, 105: 321-324, 1995.
17. Karnath HO. Optokinetic stimulation influences the disturbed perception of body orientation in spatial neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 60: 217-220, 1996.
18. Karnath HO, Christ K, and Hartje W. Decrease of contralateral neglect by neck muscle vibration and spatial orientation of trunk midline. Brain, 116: 383-396, 1993.
19. Kinsbourne M. A model for the mechanism of unilateral neglect in space. Transactions of the American Neurological Association, 95: 143-146, 1970.
20. MacLeod MS and Turnbull OH. Motor and perceptional factors in pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 37: 707-713, 1999.
21. Manning L, Halligan PW and Marshall JC. Individual variation in line bisection: A study of normal subjects with application to the interpretation of visual neglect. Neuropsychologia, 28: 647-655, 1990.
22. Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL and Bradshaw JA. Horizontal visual motion modulates focal attention in left unilateral spatial neglect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 57: 1228-1235, 1994.
23. McCourt ME, Garlinghouse M and Slater J. Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: Focusing attention on two hypotheses. Frontiers in Bioscience, 5: D58-71, 2000.
24. Nico D. Effectiveness of sensory stimulation on tactile extinction. Experimental Brain Research, 127: 75-82, 1999.
25. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9: 97-113, 1971.
26. Pizzamiglio L, Frasca R, Guariglia C, Incoccia C, and Antonucci G. Effect of optokinetic stimulation in patients with visual neglect. Cortex, 26: 535-540, 1990.
27. Posner MI, Walker JA, Friedrich FJ, and Rafal RD. Effects of pariental injury on covert orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 4: 1863-1874, 1984.
28. Post RB and Heckmann T. Induced motion and apparent straight ahead during prolonged stimulation. Perception and Psychophysics, 40: 263-270, 1986.
29. Post RB, Chi D, Heckmann T and Chaderjian M. A reevaluation of the effect of velocity on induced motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 45: 411-416, 1989.
30. Rubens AB. Caloric stimulation and unilateral visual neglect. Neurology, 35: 1019-1024, 1985.
31. Sampaio E and Chokron S. Pseudoneglect and reversed pseudoneglect among left-handers and right-handers. Neuropsychologia, 30: 797-805, 1992.
32. Schindler I and Kerkhoff G. Head and trunk orientation modulate visual neglect. Neuroreport, 8: 2681-2685, 1997.
33. Vallar G, Guariglia C, Magnotti L and Pizzamiglio L. Optokinetic stimulation affects both vertical and horizontal deficits of position sense in unilateral neglect. Cortex, 31: 669-683, 1995b.
34. Vallar G, Guariglia C, Nico D, and Pizzamiglio L. Motor deficits and optokinetic stimulation in patients with left hemineglect. Neurology, 49: 1364-1370, 1997.
35. Vallar G, Rusconi ML, Barozzi S, Bernardini B, Ovadia D, Papagno C and Cesarani A. Improvement of left visuo-spatial hemineglect by left-sided transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Neuropsychologia, 33: 73-82, 1995a.