Taxonomic indexing - Extending the role of taxonomy

Systematic Biology

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 367-373

  Patterson, David J ^a   Remsen, David ^a   Marino, William A ^a   Norton, Cathy ^a  

^a MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity informatics; Names; Taxonomic indexing; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BOTANY; CLASSIFICATION; DOCUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NOMENCLATURE; REVIEW; ZOOLOGY;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING; ANIMALS; BOTANY; CLASSIFICATION; TERMINOLOGY; ZOOLOGY;

EID: 33644900680     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150500541680     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Agosti, D., and N. F. Johnson. 2002. Taxonomists need better access to published data. Nature 417:222.
2. Biosis. 2005. Counts of new and changed animal names reported in Zoological Record, volumes 115-138. http://www.biosis.org/support/zr-changes/summary/
3. Bisby, F. A., M. A. Ruggiero, K. L. Wilson, M. Cachuela-Palacio, S. W. Kimani, Y. R. Roskov, A. Soulier-Perkins, and J. van Hertum, eds. 2005. Species 2000 & ITIS Catalogue of Life: 2005 Annual Checklist. CD-ROM. Species 2000, Reading, UK.
4. Büchen-Osmond, C. 2005. ICTVdB: The Universal Virus Database of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ICTVdb/INA
5. Chavan, V., N. Rane, A. Watve, and M. Ruiggiero. 2005. Resolving taxonomic discrepancies: Use of electronic catalogues of known organisms. Biodivers. Informa. 2:70-78.
6. Don, D. 1825. Prodromus Floræ Nepalensis; sive enumeratio vegetabilium, quæ in itinere per Nepauliam detexit atque legit F. Hamilton (olim Buchanan). Accedunt Plantæ a D. Wallich nuperius missæ. Secundum methodi naturalis normam disposuit atque descripsit D. D. London.
7. Dujardin, F. 1841. Histoire naturelle des Zoophytes - Infusoires. Paris.
8. Environment Australia. 1998. The Darwin Declaration. Australian Biological Resources Study, Environment Australia, Canberra.
9. Euzéby, J.-P. 2005. List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature. http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/
10. Farr, E.R., and G. Zijlstra. 2005. Index nominum genericorum (plantarum). http://rathbun.si.edu/botany/ing/.
11. Froese, R., and E. Capuli. 2005. The Synonyms Table. http://www.fishbase.org/manual/fishbasethe_synonyms_table.htm
12. Geoffroy, M., and W. G. Berendsohn. 2003. The concept problem in taxonomy: Importance, components, approaches. in MOReTax: Handling factual information linked to taxonomic concepts in Biology (W. G. Berendsohn, ed.). Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde 39:5-14.
13. Godfray, C. H. J. 2002. Challenges for taxonomy. Nature 417:17-19.
14. Grimaldi, D., and M. S. Engel. 2005. Evolution of the insects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. Guiry, M.D., and E. Nic Dhonncha. 2005. AlgaeBase, version 3.0. Worldwide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org; searched on 28 May 2005.
16. Hebert, P. D. N., A. Cywinska, S. L. Ball, and J. R. deWaard. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:313-321.
17. Herbert, K. G., N. H. Gehani, W H. Piel, J. T. L. Wang, and C. H. Wu. 2004. BIO-AJAX: An extensible framework for biological data cleaning. Sigmod. Rec. 33:51-57.
18. Hobern, D. 2004. Should the TDWG names/concepts standard include BioStatus information? http://circa.gbif.net/Public/irc/gbif/dadi/newsgroups?n=dadi&a=re&art=25
19. Hopkins, G. W., and R. P. Freckleton. 2002. Declines in the numbers of amateur and professional taxonomists: Implications for conservation. Anim. Conserv. 5:245-249.
20. Knapp, S., E. N. Lughadha, and A. Paton. 2005. Taxonomic inflation, species concepts and global species lists. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:7-8.
21. Koning, D., I. D. Sarkar, and T. Moritz. 2005. Taxongrab: Extractring taxonomic names from text. Biodivers. Informat. 2:79-82.
22. Lee, M. S. Y. 2000. A worrying systematic decline. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:346-348.
23. Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research. 2005. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz/
24. Margulies, M., M. Egholm, W. E. Altman, S. Attiya, J. S. Bader, L. A. Bemben, J. Berka, M. S. Braverman, Y.-J. Chen, Z. Chen, S. B. Dewell, L. Du, J. M. Fierro, X. V. Gomes, B. C. Godwin, W. He, S. Helgesen, C.-H. Ho, G. P. Irzyk, S. C. Jando, M. L. I. Alenquer, T. P. Jarvie, K. B. Jirage, J.-B. Kim, J. R. Knight, J. R. Lanza, J. H. Leamon, S. M. Lefkowitz, M. Lei, J. Li, K. L. Lohman, H. Lu, V. B. Makhijani, K. E. McDade, M. P. McKenna, E. W. Myers, E. Nickerson, J. R. Nobile, R. Plant, B. P. Puc, M. T. Ronan, G. T. Roth, G. J. Sarkis, J. F. Simons, J. W. Simpson, M. Srinivasan, K. R. Tartaro, A. Tomasz, K. A. Vogt, G. A. Volkmer, S. H. Wang, Y. Wang, M. P. Weiner, P. Yu, R. F. Begley, and J. M. Rothberg. 2005. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376-380.
25. McNeill, J. 1997. Key issues to be addressed. In The new bionomenclature: The BioCode debate (D.L. Hawksworth, ed.). Biology International Special Issue 34:17-40.
26. Neave, S. A. 1939-1996. Nomenclator zoologicus; a list of the names of genera and subgenera in zoology from the tenth edition of Linnaeus, 1758, to the end of 1935 (with supplements). Zoological Society of London, London.
27. Page, R. D. M. 2005. A taxonomic search engine: Federating taxonomic databases using web services. BMC Bioinformat. 6:48.
28. Patterson, D. J. 2003. Progressing towards a biological names register. Nature 422:661.
29. Patterson, D. J., and J. Larsen. 1991. Nomenclatural problems with protists. Regnum Vegetabile 123:197-208.
30. Patterson D. J., D. Remsen, and C. Norton. 2003. Comment on Zoological record and registration of new names in Zoology. Bull. Zool. Nomenc. 60:297-299.
31. Polaszek, A., D. Agosti, M. Alonso-Zarazaga, G. Beccaloni, P. de Place Bjørn, P. Bouchet, D. J. Brothers, Earl of Cranbrook, N. Evenhuis, H. C. J. Godfray, N. F. Johnson, F.-T. Krell, D. Lipscomb, C. H. C. Lyal, G. M. Mace, S. Mawatari, S. E. Miller, A. Minelli, S. Morris, P. K. L. Ng, D. J. Patterson, R. L. Pyle, N. Robinson, L. Rogo, J. Taverne, F. C. Thompson, J. van Tol, Q. D. Wheeler, and E. O. Wilson. 2005. A universal register for animal names. Nature 437:477.
32. Pullan, M. R., M. F. Watson, J. B. Kennedy, C. Raguenaud, and R. Hyam. 2000. The Prometheus taxonomic model: A practical approach to representing multiple classifications. Taxon. 49:55-75.
33. Saarenmaa, H., 2002. Technological opportunities and challenges in building a global biological information infrastructure. (Pages 49-59) in Towards a global biological infrastructure (H. Saarenmaa and E. H. Nielsen, eds.). European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen.
34. Stein L. 2002. Creating a bioinformatics nation. Nature 417:119-120.
35. TDWG. 1985. Taxonomic databases working group. Minutes of the first meeting at the Conservatoire et Jardin Botanique, Geneva. http://www.tdwg.org/first_minutes.pdf
36. Thompson, C. 2005. The Diptera site. http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/Diptera/diptera.htm
37. Thorne, J. 2003. Zoological record and registration of new names in zoology. Bull. Zool. Nomenc. 60:7-11.
38. Venter, J.C., K. Remington, J. F. Heidelberg, A. L. Halpern, D. Risch, J. A. Eisen, D. Wu, I. Paulsen, K. E. Nelson, W. Nelson, D. E. Fouts, S. Levy, A. H. Knap, M. W. Lomas, K. Nealson, O. White, J. Petersen, J. Hoffman, R. Parsons, H. Baden-Tollson, C. Pfannkock, Y.-H. Rogers, and H. O. Smith. 2004. Environmental genome shotgun sequencing in the Sargasso Sea. Science 304:66-74.
39. Wheeler, Q. D. 2004. Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359:571-583.
40. Wilson, E. O. 2003. The encyclopedia of life. TREE 18:77-80.