Using personality type to improve clinical education effectiveness

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 210-213

  Winn, Jan M ^a   Grantham, Vesper V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical education; Learning preferences; Personality type; Teaching strategies

Indexed keywords

ENERGY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PERSONALITY; REVIEW; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONTINUING EDUCATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; HUMAN RELATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; RADIOLOGY; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; NUCLEAR MEDICINE; PERSONALITY; TEACHING; TECHNOLOGY, RADIOLOGIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33644886925     PISSN: 00914916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Skeff KM, Stratos GA, Mygdal W, et al. Faculty development: a resource for clinical teachers. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(suppl 2):S56-S63.
2. Williamson KB, Gunderman RB, Cohen MD, Frank MS. Learning theory in radiology education. Radiology. 2004;233:15-18.
3. Hewson MG. A theory-based faculty development program for clinician-educators. Acad Med. 2000;75:498-501.
4. Myers IB. Introduction to Type. 5th ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.; 1993.
5. Kroeger O, Thuesen JM. Type Talk: The 16 Personality Types That Determine How We Live, Love, and Work. New York, NY: Dell Publishing; 1988:22-23.