All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in total knee arthroplasty - A randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components: Part 2. Completely cemented components: MB not superior to AP components

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 76, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 778-784

  Hyldahl, Hans ^a   Regnér, Lars ^c   Carlsson, Lars ^c   Kärrholm, Johan ^c   Weidenhielm, Lars ^b  

^a ST GÖRAN S HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; METAL; POLYETHYLENE; POLYETHYLENE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; SCORING SYSTEM; STEREOMETRY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; CEMENTATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE CEMENTS; CEMENTATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; POLYETHYLENES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33644870790     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17453670510045363     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adalberth G, Nilsson K G, Byström S, Kolstad, K, Milbrink J. Low-conforming all-polyethylene tibial component not inferior to metal-backed component in cemented total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (6): 783-92.
2. Apel D M, Tozzi J M, Dorr L D. Clinical comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1991; (273): 243-52.
3. Bartel D L, Burstein A H, Santavicca E A, Insall J N. Performance of the tibial component in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1982; 64: 1026-33.
4. Bert J M, McShane M. Is it necessary to cement the tibial stem in cemented total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop 1998; (356): 73-8.
5. Duffy G P, Berry D J, Rand J A. Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arhroplasty. Clin Orthop 1998; (356): 66-72.
6. Ewald F C, Wright R J, Poss R, Thomas W H, Mason M D, Sledge C B. Kinematic total knee arthroplasty. A 10-to 14-year prospective follow-up review. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14 (4): 473-80.
7. Faris P M, Ritter M A, Keating E M, Meding J B, Harty L D. The AGC all-polyethylene tibial component: a ten year clinical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2003; 85 (3): 489-93.
8. Forster M C. Survival analysis of primary cemented total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 2003; 18 (3): 265-70.
9. Gill G S, Joshi A B, Mills D M. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16-to 21-year result: Clin Orthop 1999; (367): 210-5.
10. Gioe T, Bowman K. A randomized comparison of all-polyethylene and metal-backed tibial components. Clin Orthop 2000; (380): 108-15.
11. Hyldahl H, Regnér L, Carlsson L, Kärrholm J, Weidenhielm L. All-polyethylene vs. metal-backed tibial component in tota knee arthroplasty - a randomized RSA study comparing early fixation of horizontally and completely cemented tibial components. Part 1. Horizontally cemented components: AP better fixated than MB. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 769-77.
12. Lewis J L, Askew M J, Jaycox D P. A comparative evaluation of tibial components designs of total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1982; 54 (1): 129-35.
13. L'Insalata J, Stern S, Insall J. Total knee arthroplast in elderly patients. J Arthroplast 1992; 7 (39): 261-6.
14. Lonner J H, Klotz M, Levitz C, Lotke P A. Changes in bone density after total cemented knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty2001; 16(1): 107-11.
15. Murase K, Roy D, Crowninshield R, Pedersen D, Chang T-S. An analysis of tibial component design in total knee arthroplasty. J Biomechanics 1983; 1: 13-22.
16. Ranawat C S, Flynn W F Jr, Saddler S, Hansraj K K, Maynard M J. Long term results of the total condylar knee Arthroplasty. A 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop. 1993; (286): 94-102.
17. Rand J A. Comparison of metal-backed and all-polyethylene tibial components in cruciate condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1993; 8 (3): 307-13.
18. Reilly D, Walker P S, Ben D M, Ewald F C. Effects of tibial components on loadtransfer in the upper tibia. Clin Orthop 1982; (165): 273-82.
19. Ritter M A, Faris P M, Keating E M, Meading J B. Long term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1994; (309): 136-45.
20. Rodriguez J A, Norberto B, Rasquina V, Ranawat C S. Metal-backed and All-polyethylen tibial components in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 2001; (392): 174-83.
21. Ryd L, Albrektsson B E, Carlsson L, Dansgård, F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, Regner L, Toksvik-Larsen S. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995; 77 (3): 377-83.
22. Schai P A, Thornhill T S, Scott R D. Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system. Results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998; 80: 850-8.
23. Seki T, Bourgeault C, Chareancholvanich A K, Lew W, Bechtold J E, Gustilo R B. Does a central stem affect bone strain and the stability of a cemented tibial tray in primary revision TKA? Trans Orthop Res Soc 1997; 22: 635.
24. Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. A method for the study of kinematics of the skeleton system. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl 232) 1989: 1-51.
25. Udomkiat P, Dorr L, Long W. Matched pair analysis of All Polyethylene versus metal-backed tibial components. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (6): 689-96.
26. Whiteside L A. Cementless total knee replacement. Nine to 11 years result and 10-year survivorshipanalysis. Clin Orthop 1994; (309): 185-92.