Prediction of membrane proteins in mycobacterium tuberculosis using a support vector machine algorithm

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 126-129

  Yeh, Joanne I ^a,b,c   Mao, Lisong ^a  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Membrane protein; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Signal peptides; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; SIGNAL PEPTIDE;

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL MEMBRANE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; NONHUMAN; PATHOGENESIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROTEIN SORTING SIGNALS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS;

EID: 33644870781     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.126     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bairoch, A., Boeckmann, B., Ferro, S., and Gasteiger, E. 2004. Swiss-Prot: Juggling between evolution and stability. Briefings in Bioinformatics 5, 39-55.
2. Blobel, G. 2000. Protein targeting (Nobel lecture). Chembiochem. 1, 87-102.
3. Boyd, D., Schierle, C., and Beckwith, J. 1998. How many membrane proteins are there? Protein Sci. 7, 201-205.
4. Cai, Y.D., Ricardo, P.W., Jen, C.H., and Chou, K.C. 2004. Application of SVM to predict membrane protein types. J. Theoret. Biol. 226, 373-376.
5. Chou, K.C. 2001a. Prediction of signal peptides using scaled window. Peptides 22, 1973-1979.
6. Chou, K.C. 2001b. Using subsite coupling to predict signal peptides. Protein Eng. 14, 75-79.
7. Doniger, S., Hofmann, T., and Yeh, J. 2002. Predicting CNS permeability of drug molecules: Comparison of neural network and support vector machine algorithms. J. Comp. Biol. 9, 849-864.
8. Fariselli, P., Finocchiaro, G., and Casadio, R. 2003. Prediction of signal peptide in proteins with neural networks, in Apolloni, B., Marinaro, M., and Tagliaferri, R., eds., Neural Nets, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 237-244, Springer-Verlag, New York.
9. Fu, L.M., and Fu-Liu, C.S. 2002. Is Mycobacterium tuberculosis a closer relative to Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacterial pathogens? Tuberculosis 82, 85-90.
10. Joachims, T. 1999. Making Large-Scale SVM Learning Practical. Advances in Kernel Methods-Support Vector Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Kail, L., Krogh, A., and Sonnhammer, E.L.L. 2004. A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J. Mol. Biol. 338, 1027-1036.
12. Moller, S., Croning, M.D.R., and Apweiler, R. 2001. Evaluation of methods for the prediction of membrane spanning regions. Bioinformatics 17, 646-653.
13. Nielsen, H., Engelbrecht, J., Brunak, S., and vonHeijne, G. 1997. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 10, 1-6.
14. Nielsen, H.K., Anders. 1998. Prediction of signal peptides and signal anchors by a hidden Markov model. Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, 122-130.
15. Reczko, M., Fiziev, P., Staub, E., and Hatzigeorgiou, A. 2002. Finding signal peptides in human protein sequences using recurrent neural networks, Proceedings-Algorithms in Bioinformatics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 60-67, Springer-Verlag, New York.
16. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., and Gibson, T.J. 1994. Clustal-W-Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucl. Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680.
17. Vapnik, V.N. 1995. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York.
18. Yuan, Z., Davis, M.J., Zhang, F.S., and Teasdale, R.D. 2003. Computational differentiation of N-terminal signal peptides and transmembrane helices. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 312, 1278-1283.