What influences the choice of assessment methods in health technology assessments? Statistical analysis of international health technology assessments from 1989 to 2002

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 19-25

  Draborg, Eva ^a   Andersen, Christian Kronborg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Assessment methods; HTA; Type of assessors; Type of technology

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DRUG PRODUCTS; ECONOMICS; OUTSOURCING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ASSESSMENT METHODS; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (HTA); TYPE OF ASSESSORS; TYPE OF TECHNOLOGY;

HEALTH CARE;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DEVICE; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PHARMACEUTICAL ENGINEERING; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; INTERNATIONALITY; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 33644863154     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462306050793     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Banta D. The development of health technology assessment. Health Policy. 2003;63:121-132.
2. Banta HD, Luce BR. Health care technology and its assessment. An international perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.
3. Banta HD, Perry S. A history of ISTAHC. A personal perspective on its first 10 years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:430-453.
4. Birch S, Gafni A. On being NICE in the UK: Guidelines for technology appraisal for the NHS in England and Wales. Health Econ. 2002;11:185-191.
5. Cookson R, Maynard A. Health technology assessment in Europe. Improving clarity and performance. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:639-650.
6. Davies H, Laycock G, Nutley S, Sebba J, Sheldon T. A strategic approach to research and development. In: Davies HTO, Nutley SM, Smith PC, eds. What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press; 2000:229-250.
7. Draborg E, Gyrd-Hansen D. Time-trends in health technology assessments: An analysis of developments in composition of international health technology assessments from 1989 to 2002. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:492-498.
8. Draborg E, Gyrd-Hansen D, Poulsen PB, Horder M. An international comparison of the definition and the practical application of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:89-95.
9. Eisenberg JM. Ten lessons for evidence-based technology assessment. JAMA. 1999;282:1865-1869.
10. Fuchs VR. The future of health policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1993.
11. García-Altés A, Ondategui-Parra S, Neumann PJ. Cross-national comparison of technology assessment processes. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:300-310.
12. Goodman CS, Ahn R. Methodological approaches of health technology assessment. Int J Med Inform. 1999;56:97-105.
13. Hailey D. Toward transparency in health technology assessment. A checklist for HTA reports. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19:1-7.
14. Jonsson E. Development of health technology assessment in Europe. A personal perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18:171-183.
15. Jonsson E, Banta D. Management of health technologies: An international view. BMJ. 1999;319:1293.
16. Lehoux P, Tailliez S, Denis J-L, Hivon M. Redefining health technology assessment in Canada: Diversification of products and contextualization of findings. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004;20:325-336.
17. Liberati A, Sheldon TA, Banta HD. EUR-ASSESS project subgroup report on methodology. Methodological guidance for the conduct of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:186-219.
18. Maynard A, McDaid D. Evaluating health interventions: Exploiting the potential. Health Policy. 2003;63:215-226.
19. Mears R, Taylor R, Littlejohns P, Dillon A. Review of International Health Technology Assessments (IHTA). London: National Institute of Clinical Excellence; 2000.
20. Menon D. Health technology assessment in Canada: A ten year review. Part 1. Working Paper 00-4. Edmonton: Institute of Health Economics; 2000.
21. Menon D. Health technology assessment in Canada: A ten year review. Part 2. Working Paper 00-5. Edmonton: Institute of Health Economics; 2000.
22. Menon D, Marshall D. The internationalization of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996;12:45-51.
23. Menon D, Topfer LA. Health technology assessment in Canada. A decade in review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:896-902.
24. Milne R, Clegg A, Stevens A. HTA responses and the classic HTA report. J Public Health Med. 2003;25:102-106.
25. Perleth M, Jakubowski E, Busse R. What is 'best practice' in health care? State of the art and perspectives in improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the European health care systems. Health Policy. 2001;56:235-250.
26. Perry S, Gardner E, Thamer M. The status of health technology assessment worldwide. Results of an international survey. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13:81-98.
27. Perry S, Thamer M. Health technology assessment: Decentralized and fragmented in the US compared to other countries. Health Policy. 1997;40:177-198.
28. Poulsen PB. Health technology assessment and diffusion of health technology. Odense: Odense University Press; 1999.
29. Sassi F. The European way to health technology assessment. Lessons from an evaluation of EUR-ASSESS. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16:282-290.
30. Velasco M, Perleth M, Drummond M, et al. Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18:361-422.