Effectiveness of Speech Response under Dual-Task Situations

Plastics, Rubber and Composites Processing and Applications

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 283-292

  Murata, Atsuo ^a  

^a HIROSHIMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0542420290     PISSN: 09598111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1003_5     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Damos, D. L. (1985). The effect of asymmetric transfer and speech technology on dual-task performance. Human Factors, 27, 409-421.
2. Damos, D. L. (1986). The effect of using voice generation and recognition system on the performance of dual tasks. Ergonomics, 29, 1359-1370.
3. Damos, D. L., & Lyall, E. A. (1986). The effect of varying stimulus and response modes and asymmetric transfer on the dual-task performance of discrete tasks. Ergonomics, 29, 519-533.
4. Martin, G. L. (1989). The utility of speech input in user-computer interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 30, 355-375.
5. Poulton, E. C. (1982). Influential comparisons: Effects of one strategy on another in the within-subjects designs of cognitive psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 673-690.
6. Wickens, C. D. (1980). The structure of attentional resources. In R. Nickerson & R. Pew (Eds.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 239-257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Wickens, C. D., Mountford, S. J., & Schreiner, W. (1981). Multiple resources, task-hemispheric integrity, and individual differences in time-sharing. Human Factors, 23, 211-230.
8. Wickens, C. D., Sandry, D. L., & Vidulich, M. (1983). Compatibility and resource competition between modalities of input, central processing, and output. Human Factors, 25, 227-248.