Visual stuff and active vision

Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 129-149

  Wright, Wayne ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Action; Attention; Change Blindness; Inattentional Blindness; Vision; Visual Content

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644806155     PISSN: 09515089     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09515080500462404     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ballard, D. (1991). Animate vision. Artificial Intelligence, 48, 57-86.
2. Ballard, D. (2002). Our perception of the world has to be an illusion. In Noë (2002).
3. Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 227-247.
4. Brawn, P., Snowden, R., & Wolfe, J. (1999). The minimal conditions for 'change blindness': What is hides what was. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 40, S49, abstract 263.
5. Churchland, P. S., Ramachandran, V. S., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1994). A critique of pure vision. In C. Koch & J. Davis (Eds.), Large scale neuronal theories of the brain (pp. 23-60). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.
7. Dennett, D. (2002). How could I be wrong? How wrong could I be? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(5-6), 13-16.
8. Diamond, J. (1992). The red flag of optimality. Nature, 355, 204-206.
9. Diamond, J. (1993). Quantitative design of life. Nature, 366, 405-406.
10. Feldman, J. (1985). Four frames suffice: A provisional model of vision and space. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 265-289.
11. Findlay, J., & Gilchrist, I. (2003). Active vision. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12. Germeys, F., De Graef, P., & Verfaillie, K. (2002). Transaccadic perception of saccade target and flanker objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 868-883.
13. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Goodale, M., & Humphrey, G. K. (1998). The objects of action and perception. Cognition, 67, 181-207.
15. Goodale, M., & Milner, A. D. (2004). Sight unseen. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Haines, R. (1991). A breakdown in simultaneous information processing. In L. Stark & G. Obrecht (Eds.), 4th International Symposium on Presbyopia (pp. 171-176). New York: Plenum.
17. Hayhoe, M., Bensinger, D., & Ballard, D. (1998). Task constraints in working memory. Vision Research, 38, 125-137.
18. Irwin, D. (1991). Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 420-456.
19. Irwin, D. (1996). Integrating information across saccadic eye movements. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5, 94-100.
20. Irwin, D., Yantis, S., & Jonedies, J. (1983). Evidence against visual integration across saccadic eye movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 34, 49-57.
21. Levin, D. (2002). Change blindness blindness as visual metacognition. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(5-6), 111-130.
22. Levin, D., Momen, N., Drivdahl, S., & Simons, D. (2000). Change blindness blindness: The metacognitive error of overestimating change-detection ability. Visual Cognition, 7, 397-412.
23. Mack, A. (2002). Is the visual world a grand illusion? A response. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(5-6), 102-110.
24. Mack, A. (2003). Inattentional blindness: Looking without seeing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 180-184.
25. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998a). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998b). Inattentional blindness: Perception without attention. In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 55-76). New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
28. Moore, C., & Egeth, H. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 339-352.
29. Neisser, U. (1979). The control of information pickup in selective looking. In A. D. Pick (Ed.) Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson (pp. 201-219). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Noë, A. (2002). Is the visual world a grand illusion? [Special issue]. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(5-6), 000-000.
31. O'Regan, J. K. (1992). Solving the 'real' mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.
32. O'Regan, J. K. (2005, January 30). J. Kevin O'Regan - home page. Retrieved [July 15, 2004] from http://nivea.psycho.univ-paris5.fr.
33. O'Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., & Clark, J. J. (1999). Change-blindness as a result of 'mudsplashes'. Nature, 398 34.
34. O'Regan, J. K., & Noë, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 955-975.
35. Palmer, S. (1999). Vision science: From photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Collins, W. (1984). Integrating pictorial information across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 426-442.
37. Ramachandran, V. S. (1990). Interactions between motion, depth, color, and form: The utilitarian theory of perception. In C. Blakemore (Ed.) Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 346-360). New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Rees, G., Russell, C., Frith, C., & Driver, J. (1999). Inattentional amnesia for fixed but ignored words. Science, 286, 2504-2507.
39. Rensink, R. (2000a, August). When good perceivers go bad: Change blindness, inattentional blindness, and visual experience. Psyche, 6, Article 09. Retrieved [July 15, 2004] from http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v6/psyche-6-09-rensink.html.
40. Rensink, R. (2000b). Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing. Vision Research, 40, 1469-1487.
41. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
42. Rojer, A., & Schwartz, E. (1990, June 16-21). Design considerations for a space variant visual sensor with complex logarithmic geometry. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Vol. 2, pp. 278-285). Atlantic City, NJ.
43. Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Simon, H. A. (1991). Cognitive architectures and rational analysis: Comment. In K. Van Lehn (Ed.), Architectures for intelligence (pp. 25-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Simons, D. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science, 7, 301-305.
46. Simons, D. J. (1999). To see but not to see. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 43, 165-171.
47. Simons, D. J. (2000). Attentional capture and inattentional blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 147-155.
48. Simons, D. J. (2001, September 21). Change detection database. Retrieved [July 15, 2004] from http://viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/change/demolinks.shtml.
49. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059-1074.
50. Sterelny, K. (2003). Thought in a hostile world. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
51. Trehub, A. (1991). The cognitive brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. Treisman, A. (1986). Properties, parts, and objects. In. K. Boff, L. Kaufmann, & J. Thomas (Eds.) Handbook of human perception and performance (pp. 1-70). New York: Wiley & Sons.
53. Tye, M. (1995). Ten problems of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Tye, M. (2000). Consciousness, color, and content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Wolfe, J. (1999). Inattentional amnesia. In V. Coltheart (Ed.) Fleeting memories (pp. 71-94). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Wolfe, J., & Bennett, S. (1997). Preattentive object files: Shapeless bundles of basic features. Vision Research, 37, 25-43.
57. Wolfe, J., Klemplen, N., & Dahlen, K. (2000). Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 693-716.
58. Wright, W. (2005). Distracted drivers and unattended experience. Synthese, 144, 41-68.
59. Wright, W. (in press). Explanation and the hard problem. Philosophical Studies.