Does the interval between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy affect the immediate postoperative outcome?

BJU International

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 48-50

  Lee, Daniel K ^a   Allareddy, Veerasuthpursh ^a,b   O'Donnell, Michael A ^a   Williams, Richard D ^a   Konety, Badrinath R ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Complications; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINE INCONTINENCE; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BLOOD; LENGTH OF STAY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; STATISTICS; TIME;

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

AGED; BIOPSY; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 33644792919     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05861.x     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Walsh PC Radical prostatectomy. In Walsh PC Retik AB Darracott Vaughan E Jr, Wein AJ Campbell's Urology 8th edn Philadelphia WB Saunders 2002 3107 29
2. Sokoloff MH Brendler CB Indications and contraindications for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy Urol Clin North Am 2001 28 535 43
3. White S Hricak H Forstner R et al. Prostate cancer: effect of post biopsy hemorrhage on interpretation of MR images Radiology 1995 195 385 90
4. Ikonen S Kivisaari L Vehmas T et al. Optimal timing of post-biopsy MR imaging of the prostate Acta Radiol 2001 42 70 3
5. Kaji Y Kurhanewicz J Hricak H et al. Localizing prostate cancer in the presence of post biopsy changes on MR images: role of proton MR spectroscopic imaging Radiology 1998 206 785 90
6. Dillioglugil O Leibman BD Leibman NS Kattan MW Rosas AL Scardino PT Risk factors for complications and morbidity after radical retropubic prostatectomy J Urol 1997 157 1760 7
7. Meraj S Nagler HM Homel P Shasha D Wagner JR Radical prostatectomy: size of the prostate gland and its relationship with acute perioperative complications Can J Urol 2003 10 1743 8
8. Singh A Fagin R Shah G Shekarriz B Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy J Urol 2005 173 552 4
9. Hsu EI Hong EK Lepor H Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy Urology 2003 61 601 6
10. Andriole GL Smith DS Rao G Goodnough L Catalona WJ Early complications of contemporary anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy J Urol 1994 152 1858 60
11. Lepor H Nieder AM Ferrandino MN Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases J Urol 2001 166 1729 33
12. Eastham JA Scardino PT Radical prostatectomy. In Walsh PC Retik AB Darracott Vaughan E Jr, Wein AJ Campbell's Urology 8th edn Philadelphia WB Saunders 2002 3080 106
13. Augustin H Hammerer P Graefen M et al. Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: results of a single center between 1999 and 2002 Eur Urol 2003 43 113 8
14. Pinkstaff DM Igel TC Petrou SP Broderick GA Wehle MJ Young PR Systematic transperineal ultrasound-guided template biopsy of the prostate: three-year experience Urology 2005 65 735 9
15. Jones JS Oder M Zippe CD Saturation prostate biopsy with periprostatic block can be performed in office J Urol 2002 168 2108 10
16. Vaidya A Soloway MS Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: an update of the Miami experience Eur Urol 2001 40 135 8