Rat embryo quality and production efficiency are dependent on gonadotrophin dose in superovulatory treatments

Laboratory Animals

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 87-95

  Cornejo Cortes M A ^a   Sanchez Torres C ^a   Vazquez Chagoyan J C ^b   Suarez Gomez H M ^a   Garrido Farina G ^c   Meraz Ríos, Marco A ^a  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DEL ESTADO DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Gonadotrophin; Rat embryonic stem (ES) cells; Superovulation

Indexed keywords

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; GONADOTROPIN; SERIC GONADOTROPIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO CULTURE; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FEMALE; HORMONE ACTION; MATING; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; QUALITY CONTROL; RAT; RAT STRAIN; SUPEROVULATION; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG THERAPY, COMBINATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; GONADOTROPINS, EQUINE; PREGNANCY; RATS; RATS, INBRED F344; RATS, WISTAR; SUPEROVULATION;

ANIMALIA; RATTUS NORVEGICUS;

EID: 33644782998     PISSN: 00236772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/002367706775404471     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Auerbach AB, Norinsky R, Ho W, et al. (2003) Strain-dependent differences in the efficiency of transgenic mouse production. Transgenic Research 12, 59-69
2. Capecchi MR (1989) The new mouse genetics: altering the genome by gene targeting. Trends in Genetics 5, 70-6
3. Corbin TJ, McCabe IG (2002) Strain variation of immature female rats in response to various superovulatory hormone preparations and routes of administration. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science 41, 18-23
4. Cuello C, Berthelot F, Martinat-Botte F, et al. (2004) Transfer of vitrified blastocysts from one or two superovulated large white hyperprolific donors to Meishan recipients: reproductive parameters at day 30 of pregnancy. Theriogenology 61, 843-50
5. Charreau B, Tesson L, Soulillou JP, Pourcel C, Anegon I (1996) Transgenic in rats: technical aspects and models. Transgenic Research 5, 223-34
6. Eistetter HR (1989) Pluripotent embryonal stem cell lines can be established from disaggregated mouse morulae. Development Growth &. Differentiation 31, 275-82
7. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH (1981) Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154-6
8. Graff KJ, Meintjes M, Han Y, et al. (2000) Comparing follicle stimulating hormone from two commercial sources for oocyte production from out-of-season dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 484-7
9. Hirabayashi M, Ito K, Sekimoto A (2001) Production of transgenic rats using young Sprague-Dawley females treated with PMSG and hCG. Experimental Animals 50, 365-9
10. Hogan B, Beddington R, Costantini F, Lacy E (1994) Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edn. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
11. Iannaccone PM, Taborn GU, Garton RL, Caplice MD, Brenin DR (1994) Pluripotent embryonic stem cells from the rat are capable of producing chimeras. Developmental Biology 163, 288-92
12. Ishigame H, Medan MS, Watanabe G, et al. (2004) A new alternative method for superovulation using passive immunization against inhibin in adult rats. Biology of Reproduction 71, 236-4-3
13. Kanitz W, Becker A, Schneider F, et al. (2002) Superovulation in cattle: practical aspects of gonadotrophin treatment and insemination. Reproduction Nutrition Development 42, 587-99
14. Krivokharchenko A, Popova E, Zaitseva I, Vil'ianovich L, Ganten D (2003) Development of parthenogenetic rat embryos. Biology of Reproduction 68, 829-36
15. Mukumoto S, Mori K, Ishikawa H (1995) Efficient induction of superovulation in adult rats by PMSG and hCG. Experimental Animals 44, 111-18
16. Ouhibi N, Sullivan NF, English J, Colledge WH, Evans MJ, Clarke NJ (1995) Initial culture behavior of rat blastocysts on selected feeder cell lines. Molecular Reproduction and Development 40, 311-24
17. Popova E, Krivokharchenko A, Ganten D, Bader M (2002) Comparison between PMSG- and FSH-induced superovulation for the generation of transgenic rats. Molecular Reproduction and Development 63, 177-82
18. Robertson EJ (1987) Embryo-derived stem cell lines. In: Teratocarcynomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: A Practical Approach (Robertson EJ, ed). Oxford: IRL Press, 71-112
19. Santiago-Moreno J, Gonzalez-Bulnes A, Gomez-Brunet A, et al. (2001) Procedure for successful interspecific embryo transfer from mouflon (Ovis gmelini musimon) to Spanish merino sheep (Ovis aries). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 32, 336-41
20. Tain CF, Goh VHH, Ng SC (2000) Effects of hyper-stimulation with gonadotrophins and age of females on oocytes and their metaphase II status in rats. Molecular Reproduction and Development 55, 104-8
21. Tain CF, Goh VHH, Ng SC (2001) Dose response effects of equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) on early embryonic development and viable pregnancy rate in rats. Reproduction 122, 283-7
22. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, et al. (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 1145-7
23. Vassilieva S, Guan K, Pich U, Wobus AM (2000) Establishment of SSEA-1- and Oct-4-expressing rat embryonic stem-like cell lines and effects of cytokines of the IL-6 family on clonal growth. Experimental Cell Research 258, 361-73