|
Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 272-276
|
How are solar keratoses treated by general practitioners in Australia?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CORTICOSTEROID DERIVATIVE;
FLUOROURACIL;
RETINOID DERIVATIVE;
SALICYLIC ACID;
SULFUR;
ACTINIC KERATOSIS;
ARTICLE;
AUSTRALIA;
CAUTERIZATION;
CONSULTATION;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
COST OF ILLNESS;
CRYOTHERAPY;
DERMATOLOGY;
ECONOMIC ASPECT;
FEMALE;
GENERAL PRACTITIONER;
HEALTH CARE COST;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MEDICAL RECORD;
MEDICAL SPECIALIST;
PATIENT REFERRAL;
PATIENT SELECTION;
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
RANDOMIZATION;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
SELF REPORT;
AUSTRALIA;
CRYOTHERAPY;
FAMILY PRACTICE;
FEMALE;
HEAD;
HEALTH CARE COSTS;
HEALTH CARE SURVEYS;
HUMANS;
KERATOSIS;
MALE;
PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;
PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS;
REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SKIN NEOPLASMS;
SUNLIGHT;
UPPER EXTREMITY;
|
EID: 33644771162
PISSN: 00119059
EISSN: 13654632
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02477.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (10)
|