Drug testing and procedural fairness: The influence of situational variables

Social Justice Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 25-40

  Ambrose, Maureen L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Fairness of drug testing; Interactional justice; Organizational justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644766388     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007523802197     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2. New York, Academic Press, pp. 267-299.
2. Ackerman, S. (1989). Drug testing: The state of the art. Am. Sci. 77: 19-23.
3. Ambrose, M. L., Harland, L. K., and Kulik, C. T. (1991). Influence of social comparisons on perceptions of organizational fairness. J. Appl. Psych. 76: 239-246.
4. Bahls, J. E. (1998). Dealing with drugs: Keepir legal. HRMagazine 43: 104-110.
5. Bies, R. J. (1985). Individual reactions to corporate recruiting encounters: The importance of fairness. Unpublished manuscript.
6. Bies, R. J., and Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., and Bazerman, M. H. (eds.), Research on Negotiations in Organizations, Vol. 1, Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, pp. 43-55.
7. Brockner, J., Tyler, T. R., and Cooper-Schneider, R. (1992). The influence of prior commitment to an institution on reactions of perceived unfairness: The higher they are, the harder they fall. Admin. Sci. Quart. 37: 241-261.
8. Brockner, J., and Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: The interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psych. Bull. 120: 189-208.
9. Companies adding and expanding workplace drug testing programs at record pace. Business Wire, April 1, 1993.
10. Crant, J. M., and Bateman, T. S. (1989). A model of employee responses to drug-testing programs. EmployeeResp. Rights J. 2: 173-190.
11. Crant, J. M., and Bateman, T. S. (1990). An experimental test of the impact of drug-testing programs on potential job applicants' attitudes and intentions. J. Appl. Psych. 75: 127-131.
12. Cropanzano, R., and Folger, R. (1989). Reference cognitions and task decision autonomy: Beyond equity theory. J. Appl. Psych. 74: 293-299.
13. Cropanzano, R., and Folger, R. (1991). Procedural justice and worker motivation. In Steers, R. M., and Porter, L. W. (eds.), Motivation and Work Behavior, 5th Ed. New York, McGraw-Hill, pp. 131-143.
14. Cropanzano, R., and Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In Robertson, L. T., and Cooper, C. L. (eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
15. Cropanzano, R., and Konovsky, M. A. (1995). Resolving the justice dilemma by improving the outcomes: The case of employee drug testing. J. Bus. Psych. 10: 221-243.
16. Crown, D. F., and Rosse, J. G. (1988). A critical review of the assumptions underlying drug testing. J. Bus. Psych. 3: 22-41.
17. "Drug testing grows, AMA study finds." (1996). Man. Off. Technol. 41: 23.
18. Folger, R. (1986). Rethinking equity theory: A referent cognitions model. In Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.), Justice in Social Relations. New York: Plenum.
19. Folger, R., and Bies, R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice. Employee Respons. Rights J. 2: 79-90.
20. Garland, H., Giacobbe, J., and French, J. L. (1989). Attitudes toward employee and employer rights in the workplace. Employee Respons. Rights J. 2: 49-59.
21. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., and Balkin, D. B. (1987). Dimensions and characteristics of personnel manager perceptions of effective drug-testing programs. Person. Psych. 40: 745-764.
22. Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Acad. Manag. Rev. 12(1): 9-22.
23. Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J. Manag. 16: 399-432.
24. Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decis. Proc. 54: 81-103.
25. Greenberg, J., and Folger, R. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In Rowland, K., and Ferris, G. (eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 3, Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, pp. 141-183.
26. Huo, Y. J., Smith, H. J., Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1996). Superordinate identification, subgroup identification, and justice concerns: Is separatism the problem; Is assimilation the answer? Psych. Sci. 7: 40-45.
27. Konovsky, M. A., and Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. J. Appl. Psych. 76: 698-707.
28. Konovsky, M. A., and Cropanzano, R. (1995). Justice considerations in employee drug testing. In Cropanzano, R. (ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 171-192.
29. Labig, C. E., Jr. (1992). Supervisory and nonsupervisory employee attitude about drug testing. Employee Respons. Rights J. 5: 131-141.
30. Lahey, J. W. (1986). Who's rights are violated? Nat. Safety Health News 133: 26-31.
31. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In Gergen, K. J., Greenberg, M. S., and Willis, R. H. (eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, New York, Plenum, pp. 27-55.
32. Lind, E. A. (1992). The fairness heuristic: Rationality and "relationality" in procedural evaluations. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference of the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics, Irvine, CA.
33. Lind, E. A. (1994). Procedural justice, disputing, and reactions to legal authorities. (ABF Working Paper No. 9402). Chicago: American Bar Foundation.
34. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., and Early, P. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and non-instrumental concerns in fairness judgments. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 59: 952-959.
35. Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M. L., and de Vera, M.V. 1993. Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38: 224-251.
36. Lind, E. A., and Lissak, R. I. (1985). Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments. J. Exp. Soc. Psych. 21: 19-29.
37. Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York, Plenum.
38. Masters, M. F., Ferris, G. R., and Ratcliff, S. L. (1988). Practices and attitudes of substance abuse testing. Person. Admin. 33: 72-78.
39. McDaniel, M. A. (1988). Does pre-employment drug use predict on the job suitability. Person. Psych. 41: 717-729.
40. Murphy, K. R., Thornton, G. C., and Reynolds, D. H. (1990). College students' attitudes toward employee drug testing programs. Person. Psych. 43: 615-631.
41. Norman, J., Salyards, S. D., and Mahoney, J. J. (1990). An evaluation of preemployment drug testing. J. App. Psych. 75: 629-639.
42. O'Keefe, A. M. (1987). The case against drug testing. Psych. Today 21: 34-38.
43. "One-quarter of firms said to screen employees." (1986). The National Report on Substance Abuse 1: 4-5.
44. Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
45. Smither, J. W., Millsap, R. E., and Snoffey, R. W. (1996). An experimental test of the influence of selection procedures on fairness perceptions, attitudes about the organization, and job pursuit intentions. J. Bos. Psych. 10: 297-318.
46. Stone, D. L., and Kotch, D. A. (1989). Individuals' attitudes toward organizational drug testing policies and practices. J. App. Psych. 74: 518-521.
47. Tepper, B. J., and Braun, C. K. (1995). Does the experience of organizational justice mitigate the invasion of privacy engendered by random drug testing? An experimental investigation. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 16: 211-225.
48. Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Tyler, T. R., and Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In Carrol, J. S. (ed.), Applied Social Psychology in Organizational Settings, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, pp. 77-98.
50. Tyler, T. R., and Degoey, P. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 69: 482-497.
51. van Den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 72: 95-104.