The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 316-327

  Hughes, Robert W ^a,b   Jones, Dylan M ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEARING; HUMAN; LEARNING; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECALL; VISION;

ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; SERIAL LEARNING; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 17744380027     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.316     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Allport, D. A. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neuro-physiological considerations of attention and action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 395-419). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Allport, D. A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 631-682). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Allport, D. A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of 25 years. In D. E. Meyer and S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 183-218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Anderson, M. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415-445.
5. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
6. Baddeley, A. D., & Salamé, P. (1986). The unattended speech effect: Perception or memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 525-529.
7. Beaman, C. P. (2000). Computational explorations of the irrelevant sound effect in serial short-term memory. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 37-41). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (1997). The role of serial order in the irrelevant speech effect: Tests of the changing state hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 459-471.
9. Beaman, C. P., & Jones, D. M. (1998). Irrelevant sound disrupts order information in free recall as in serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 51(A.), 615-636.
10. Boyle, R., & Coltheart, V. (1996). Effects of irrelevant sound on phonological coding in reading comprehension and short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49(A), 398-416.
11. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Bridges, A. M., & Jones, D. M. (1996). Word dose in the disruption of serial recall by irrelevant speech: Phonological confusions or changing state? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49(A), 919-939.
13. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
14. Buchner, A., Irmen, L., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). On the irrelevance of semantic information for the "irrelevant speech" effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 49(A), 765-779.
15. Burani, C., Vallar, G., & Bottini, G. (1991). Articulatory coding and phonological judgements on written words and pictures: The role of the phonological output buffer. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3, 379-398.
16. Campbell, T., Beaman, C. P., & Berry, D. C. (2002). Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: Further evidence for changing-state disruption. Memory, 10, 199-214.
17. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257-271.
18. Colle, H. A. (1980). Auditory encoding in visual short-term recall: Effects of noise intensity and spatial location. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 722-735.
19. Colle, H. A., & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 17-32.
20. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
21. Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 272-300.
22. Elliott, E. M. (2002). The irrelevant-speech effect and children: Theoretical implications of developmental change. Memory & Cognition, 30, 478-487.
23. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
24. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
25. Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In A. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-111). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2001). The intrusiveness of sound: Laboratory findings and their implications for noise abatement. Noise & Health, 13, 55-74.
28. Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2003a). Indispensable benefits and unavoidable costs of unattended sound for cognitive functioning. Noise & Health, 6, 63-76.
29. Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2003b). A negative order-repetition priming effect: Inhibition of order in unattended auditory sequences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 199-218.
30. Jones, D. M. (1993). Objects, streams, and threads of auditory attention. In A. D. Baddeley & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention: Selection, awareness, and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 167-198). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
31. Jones, D. M. (1999). The cognitive psychology of auditory distraction: The 1997 BPS Broadbent Lecture. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 167-187.
32. Jones, D. M., Alford, D., Bridges, A., Tremblay, S., & Macken, W. J. (1999). Organizational factors in selective attention: The interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming in the irrelevant sound effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 464-473.
33. Jones, D. M., Beaman, C. P., & Macken, W. J. (1996). The object-oriented episodic record model. In S. Gathercole (Ed.), Models of short-term memory (pp. 209-238). London: Erlbaum.
34. Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1993). Irrelevant tones produce an irrelevant speech effect: Implications for phonological coding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 369-381.
35. Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1995). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within- or between-stream similarity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 103-115.
36. Jones, D. M., Macken, W. J., & Nicholls, A. P. (2004). The phonological store of working memory: Is it phonological, and is it a store? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 656-674.
37. Jones, D. M., Madden, C., & Miles, C. (1992). Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: The role of changing state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 44(A), 645-669.
38. Jones, D. M., Miles, C., & Page, J. (1990). Disruption of proofreading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 89-108.
39. Jones, D. M., & Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 550-558.
40. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41. Larsen, J. D., Baddeley, A. D., & Andrade, J. (2000). Phonological similarity and the irrelevant speech effect: Implications for models of short-term verbal memory. Memory, 8, 145-157.
42. LeCompte, D. C. (1994). Extending the irrelevant speech effect beyond serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1396-1408.
43. LeCompte, D. C., & Shaibe, D. M. (1997). On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 50(A), 100-118.
44. Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (2003). Reification of phonological storage. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 56(A), 1279-1288.
45. Macken, W. J., Mosdell, N., & Jones, D. M. (1999). Explaining the irrelevant-sound effect: Temporal distinctiveness or changing state? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 810-814.
46. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
47. Miles, C., Jones, D. M., & Madden, C. A. (1991). Locus of the irrelevant speech effect in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 578-584.
48. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 16, 343-354.
50. Navon, D. (1984). Resources - a theoretical soup stone? Psychological Review, 91, 216-234.
51. Neath, I. (2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 403-423.
52. Neely, C. B., & LeCompte, D. C. (1999). The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. Memory & Cognition, 27, 37-44.
53. Neumann, O. (1984). Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Cognition and motor processes (pp. 255-293). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
54. Neumann, O. (1987). Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 361-393). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Neumann, O. (1989). On the origins and status of the concept of automatic processing. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 197, 411-428.
56. Neumann, O. (1996). Theories of attention. In O. Neumann & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action (Vol. 3, pp. 389-446). London: Academic Press.
57. Richardson, J. T. (1984). Developing the theory of working memory. Memory & Cognition, 12, 71-83.
58. Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory in SLA. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631-677). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
59. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 150-164.
60. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Effects of background music on phonological short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 41(A), 107-122.
61. Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1990). The effects of irrelevant speech on immediate free recall. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 540-542.
62. Sanders, A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
64. Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the conditioned reflex. London: Pergamon Press.
65. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-661.
66. Tipper, S. P., Howard, L. A., & Jackson, S. R. (1997). Selective reaching to grasp: Evidence for distractor interference effects. Visual Cognition, 4, 1-38.
67. Treisman, A. (1964). The effect of irrelevant material on the efficiency of selective listening. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 533-546.
68. Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (1998). Role of habituation in the irrelevant sound effect: Evidence from the effects of token set size and rate of transition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 659-671.
69. Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (1999). Change of intensity fails to produce an irrelevant sound effect: Implications for the representation of unattended sound. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1005-1015.
70. Tremblay, S., Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (2000). Elimination of the word length effect by irrelevant sound revisited. Memory & Cognition, 28, 841-846.
71. Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1992). Selective attention in vision. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
72. Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63-102). New York: Academic Press.
73. Yantis, S. (1998). Control of visual attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 223-256). Hove, England: Psychology Press.