Adaptability and stability of bean cultivars as determined via yield-stability statistic and GGE biplot analysis

Journal of Crop Improvement

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 97-120

  Kang, Manjit S ^a   Aggarwal, Vas D ^b,c   Chirwa, Rowland M ^d  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CIAT   (Malawi)

^c Chitedze Agricultural Research Station ^*  (Canada)

^d CHITEDZE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION   (Malawi)

Author keywords

Adaptability; Common bean; GGE biplot analysis; Phaseolus vulgaris; Stability analysis; Yield stability statistic

Indexed keywords

PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM); PHASEOLUS VULGARIS;

EID: 33644697464     PISSN: 15427528     EISSN: 15427536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J411v15n01_08     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Acosta-Gallegos, J.A. and M.W. Adams, 1991. Plant traits and yield stability of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars under drought stress. J. Agric. Sci. 117:213-219.
2. Acosta-Gallegos, J.A. and J.W. white, 1995. Phenological plasticity as an adaptation by common bean to rainfed environments. Crop Sci. 35:199-204.
3. Annicchiarico, P., 2002. Defining adaptation strategies and yield-stability targets in breeding programs. In M.S. Kang (ed.), Quantitative Genetics, Genomics and Plant Breeding, pp. 365-383. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
4. Ayeh, E., 1988. Evidence for yield stability in selected landraces of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Exp. Agric. 24:367-373.
5. Beaver, J.S., G.F. Freytag, D.P. Coyne and C.V. Paniagua, 1985. Yield stability of dry bean genotypes in the Dominican Republic. Crop Sci. 25:923-926.
6. Bertoia, L.M., R. Burak and M. Torrecillas. 2002. Identifying inbred lines capable of improving ear and stover yield and quality of superior silage maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 42: 365-372.
7. Ceccarelli, S., W. Erskine, J. Hamblin and S. Grando, 1994. Genotype by environment interaction and international breeding programs. Exp. Agric. 30:177-187.
8. CIAT, 2004. Common bean at http://www.ciat.cgiar.org/about_ciat/ cropfocus.htm. Verified September 12, 2004.
9. Eberhart, S.A. and W.A. Russell, 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36-40.
10. Gauch, H.G., Jr., 1992. Statistical Analysis of Regional Yield Trials: AMMI Analysis of Factorial Designs. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
11. Gauch, H.G., Jr. and R.W. Zobel, 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. In M.S. Kang and H.G. Gauch, Jr. (eds.), Genotype-by-Environment Interaction, pp. 85-122. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
12. Glaz, B., J.D. Miller and M.S. Kang, 1985. Evaluation of cultivar-testing locations in sugarcane. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71:22-25.
13. Gravois, K.A. and J.L. Bernhardt. 2000. Heritability and genotype X environment interactions for discolored rice kernels. Crop Sci. 40:314-318.
14. Hamblin, J., 1975. Effect of environment, seed size, and competitive ability on yield and survival of Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes in mixture. Euphytica 24:435-445.
15. Haynes, K.G., D.R. Wilson and M.S. Kang, 1995. Genotype X environment interactions for specific gravity in diploid potatoes. Crop Sci. 35:977-981.
16. Hühn, M., 1979. Beitrage zur Erfassung der phanotypischen Stabilitat. I. Varschlag einiger auf Ranginformtionen beruhenden Stabilitatsparameter, EDV in Medizin und Biologie 10:112-117.
17. Kang, M.S., 1988. A rank-sum method for selecting high yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Res. Commun. 16:113-115.
18. Kang, M.S., 1989. New SAS program for calculating stability-variance parameters. J. Hered. 80:415.
19. Kang, M.S., 1993. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agron. J. 85:754-757.
20. Kang, M.S., 1998. Using genotype-by-environment interaction for crop cultivar development. Advances in Agronomy 62:199-252.
21. Kang, M.S. (ed.), 2002. Quantitative Genetics, Genomics and Plant Breeding. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
22. Kang, M.S. and D.P. Gorman, 1989. Genotype X environment interaction in maize. Agron. J. 81:662-664.
23. Kang, M.S. and R. Magari, 1995. STABLE: A BASIC program for calculating stability and yield-stability statistics. Agron. J. 87:276-277.
24. Kang, M.S. and J.D. Miller, 1984. Genotype X environment interactions for cane and sugar yield and their implications in sugarcane breeding. Crop Sci. 24:435-440.
25. Kang, M.S., J.D. Miller and L.L. Darrah, 1987. A note on relationship between stability variance and ecovalence. J. Hered. 78:107.
26. Kelly, J.D., G.V. Varner and M.W. Adams, 1987. Yield stability of determinate and indeterminate dry bean cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74:516-521.
27. Matheson, A.C. and P.P. Cotterill, 1990. Utility of genotype X environment interactions. For. Ecol. Manage. 30:159-174.
28. Mekbib, F., 2002. Simultaneous selection for high yield and stability in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. J. Agric. Sci. 138:249-253.
29. Mekbib, F., 2003. Yield stability in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Euphytica 130:147-153.
30. Nienhuis, J. and S.P. Singh, 1985. Effects of location and plant density on yield and architectural traits in dry bean. Crop Sci. 25:579-584.
31. Park, S.J., 1987. Cultivar by environment interactions, yield stability and grouping of test locations for field bean cultivar trials in Ontario. Canadian J. Plant Sci. 67:653-659.
32. Pazdernik, D.L., L.L. Hardman and J.H. Orf, 1997. Agronomic performance and stability of soybean varieties grown in three maturity zones in Minnesota. J. Prod. Agric. 10:425-430.
33. Priyadarshan, P.M., 2003. Contributions of weather variables for specific adaptation of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell.-Arg) clones. Genetics and Molecular Biology 26: (4) 435-440.
34. SAS Institute, 1999. SAS User's Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
35. Shukla, G.K., 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29:237-245.
36. Simmonds, N.W., 1991. Selection for local adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82:363-367.
37. Singh, S.P., 1993. Bean genetics. In A. van Schoonhoven and O. Voysest (eds.), Common Beans: Research for Crop Improvement, pp. 199-286. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
38. Singh, S.P., 1999. Production and utilization. In S.P. Singh (ed.), Common Bean Improvement in the Twenty-First Century, pp. 1-14. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
39. Singh, S.P., 2002. The common bean and its genetic improvement. In M.S. Kang (ed.), Crop Improvement: Challenges in the Twenty-First Century, pp. 161-192. Food Products Press - an imprint of The Haworth Press, Binghamton, NY.
40. Waldron, B.L., K.H. Asay and K.B. Jensen, 2002. Stability and yield of cool-season pasture grass species grown at five irrigation levels. Crop Sci. 42: 890-896.
41. Wortmann, C.S., H.E. Gridley and S.M. Musaana, 1996. Seed yield and stability of bean multiline. Field Crops Res. 46:153-159.
42. Yan, W., 2001. GGEbiplot-a Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other two-way data. Agron. J. 93:1111-1118.
43. Yan, W. and M.S. Kang, 2003. GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.