Yield stability in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes

Euphytica

Volumn 130, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 147-153

  Mekbib, Frew ^a,b  

^a HARAMAYA UNIVERSITY   (Ethiopia)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Common bean; Ethiopia; Genotype x environment interaction; Growth habit; Phaseolus vulgaris; Simultaneous selection; Stability; Yield

Indexed keywords

PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM); PHASEOLUS VULGARIS;

EID: 0037249083     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022878015943     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ablett, G.R., R.I. Buzell, W.D. Beversdoff & O.B., Allen, 1994. Comparative stability of indeterminate and semi-determinate soybean lines. Crop Sci 34(2): 347-351.
2. Allard, R.W. & A.D. Bradshaw, 1964. Implications of genotype environment interactions. Crop Sci 4: 503-508.
3. Allen, D.J., 1994. An annotated list of diseases, pathogens and associated fungi of the common bean (P. vulgaris L.) in eastern and southern Africa. CIAT. CAB. Phytopathological papers, No. 34, pp. 1-2.
4. Assefa, I., 1985. Bean production in Ethiopia. In: Regional workshop on potential of field beans (P. vulgaris L.) in West Asia and North Africa, Aleppo, Syria, 1983, pp. 15-38.
5. Beaver, J.S., C.V. Paniagua, D.P. Coyne & G.F., Freytag, 1985. Yield stability of dry bean genotypes in the Dominican republic. Crop Sci 25: 923-926.
6. Becker, H.C. & J. Leon, 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed 101: 1-23.
7. Becker, H.C., 1981. Correlations among some statistical measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica 30: 835-884.
8. Eberhart, S.A. & N.A. Russell, 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6: 34-40.
9. Mekbib, F., 1997. Farmer Participatory common bean (P. vulgaris) genotype evaluation: the case of eastern Ethiopia. Expt Agric 33: 399-408.
10. Kang, M.S., 1989. New SAS program for calculating stability variance. J Hered 80: 415.
11. Kang, M.S. (Ed.), 1990. Genotype-by-Environment Interaction and Plant Breeding. Louisana State Univ. Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 392 pp.
12. Kang, M.S., 1993. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: consequences for growers. Agron J 85: 754-757.
13. Kang, M.S. & H.N. Pham, 1991. Simultaneous selection for high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Agron J 83: 161-165.
14. Kelly, J.D., N.W. Adams & G.V. Varner, 1987. Yield stability of determinate and indeterminate dry bean cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 82: 363-367.
15. Lin, C.S., M.R. Binns & L.P. Lefkovitch, 1986. Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Sci 26: 894-900.
16. Pachico, D., 1993. The demand for bean technology. In: G. Henrt (Ed.), Trends in CIAT Commodities, pp. 60-73. CIAT.
17. Pham, H.N. & M.S. Kang, 1988. Interrelationships among and repeatability of several stability statistics estimated from international maize trials. Crop Sci 28: 925-928.
18. Pinthus, M.J., 1973. Estimate of genotypic value: A proposed method. Euphytica 22: 121-123.
19. Roemer, J., 1917. Sinde die ertagsreichen sorten ertagissicherer ? Mitt DLG 32: 87-89.
20. Singh, S.P., 1984. A key for identification of different growth habits of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Ann Rep Bean Improv Coop 25: 92-95.
21. Shulka, G.K., 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29: 237-245.
22. Wortmann, C.S. & D.J. Allen, 1994. African bean production environments; their definition, characteristics and constraints. Network Bean Res Africa, Occ pap ser, No. 11, Dares Salam, Tanzania.
23. Wricke, G., 1962. Uberine Methode zur Efrassung der okologischen Streubreite in Feldversuchen. Z Pflanzenzuecht 47: 92-96.