Democracy, bureaucracy and difference in US community development politics since 1968

Progress in Human Geography

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 44-61

  Newman, Kathe ^a   Lake, Robert W ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Activism; Community development; Community organizing; Neoliberalism; Social movements; Structural transformation; Urban politics

Indexed keywords

BUREAUCRACY; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; DEMOCRACY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33644688178     PISSN: 03091325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0309132506ph590oa     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Amin, A., editor 1994: Post-Fordism: a reader. Blackwell.
2. Anglin, R., editor 2004: Building the organizations that build communities: strengthening the capacity of faith-and community-based development organizations. US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
3. Bawden, D. and Palmer, J. 1984: Social policy: challenging the welfare state. In Palmer, J. and Sawhill, I., editors, The Reagan record: an assessment of America's changing domestic priorities, Ballinger, 177-215.
4. Blair, T. 1998: The Third Way: new politics for the new century. The Fabian Society.
5. Brenner, N. and Theodore, N., editors 2002: Spaces of neoliberalism: urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Blackwell.
6. Brookings Institution 2004: E-mail solicitation for funding proposals under the 'Urban Markets Initiative'. Received 20 January 2004; accessed 22 February 2005 at http://www.brookings.edu/metro/umi.htm
7. Caraley, D. 1992: Washington abandons the cities. Political Science Quarterly 107, 1-30.
8. Caraley, D. 1996: Dismantling the federal safety net: fictions versus realities. Political Science Quarterly 111, 225-58.
9. Carr, J. 1999: Community, capital, and markets: a new paradigm for community reinvestment. Neighborhood/Works Journal 17, 20-23.
10. Castells, M. 1977: The urban question: a marxist approach. Edward Arnold.
11. Castells, M. 1983: The city and the grassroots: a cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. University of California Press.
12. Clavel, P. 1986: The progressive city. Rutgers University Press.
13. Conlon, T. 1998: From new federalism to devolution: twenty-five years of intergovernmental reform. Brookings Institution Press.
14. DeFilippis, J. 2004: Unmaking Goliath: community control in the face of global capital. Routledge.
15. Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, J. and Swanstrom, T. 2004: Place matters: metropolitics for the twenty-first century (second edition). University Press of Kansas.
16. Elwood, S. and Leitner, H. 2003: GIS and spatial knowledge production for neighborhood revitalization: negotiating state priorities and neighborhood visions. Journal of Urban Affairs 25, 139-57.
17. Fainstein, S. 1987: Local mobilization and economic discontent. In Smith, M. and Feagin, J., editors, The capitalist city: global restructuring and community politics, Blackwell, 323-42.
18. Fish, J. 1973: Black power, white control: the struggle of The Woodlawn Organization in Chicago. Princeton University Press.
19. Fisher, R. 1984: Let the people decide: neighborhood organizing in America. Twayne.
20. Ford Foundation. 1998: Seizing opportunities: the role of CDCs in urban economic development. Ford Foundation.
21. Fraser, J., Lepofsky, J., Kick, E. and Williams, J. 2003: The construction of the local and the limits of contemporary community-building in the United States. Urban Affairs Review 38, 417-45.
22. Fyfe, N. 2005: Making space for 'neo-communitarianism'? The third sector, state and civil society in the UK. Antipode 37, 536-57.
23. Fyfe, N. and Milligan, C. 2003a: Space, citizenship and voluntarism: critical reflections on the voluntary sector in Glasgow. Environment and Planning A 35, 2069-86.
24. Fyfe, N. and Milligan, C. 2003b: Out of the shadows: exploring contemporary geographies of voluntarism. Progress in Human Geography 27, 397-413.
25. Gans, H. 1972: The positive functions of poverty. American Journal of Sociology 78, 275-89.
26. Giddens, A. 1998: The Third Way: the renewal of social democracy. Polity Press.
27. Gittell, M. 1980: Limits to citizen participation: decline of community organizations. Sage.
28. Gittell, M., Newman, K. and Ortega-Bustamante, I. 1995: Building civic capacity: best CDC practices. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Urban Affairs Association, Portland, OR.
29. Glickman, N. and Servon, L. 1998: More than bricks and sticks: five components of community development corporation capacity. Housing Policy Debate 9, 497-539.
30. Glickman, N. and Servon, L. 2003: By the numbers: measuring community development corporations' capacity. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22, 240-56.
31. Griffith, M. 2003: The black organizer blues. Shelterforce 130, 21-23.
32. Hackworth, J. 2002: Local autonomy, bond-rating agencies and neoliberal urbanism in the United States. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 266, 707-25.
33. Hackworth, J. and Smith, N. 2002: The changing state of gentrification. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 92, 464-77.
34. Harding, A. 1995: European city regimes? Inter-urban competition in the new Europe. Paper presented at the ESRC Local Governance Conference, Exeter, UK, 19-20 September.
35. Harvey, D. 1989: From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler 71B, 3-17.
36. Isin, E., editor 2000: Democracy, citizenship and the global city. Routledge.
37. Jargowsky, P. 1998: Poverty and place. Russell Sage Foundation.
38. Jessop, B. 1994: Post-Fordism and the state. In Amin, A., editor, Post-Fordism: a reader, Blackwell, 251-79.
39. Jessop, B. 2002a: The future of the capitalist state. Polity Press.
40. Jessop, B. 2002b: Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: a state-theoretical perspective. In Brenner, N. and Theodore, N., editors, Spaces of neoliberalism: urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe, Blackwell, 105-25.
41. Jonas, A. and Wilson, D., editors 1999: The urban growth machine: critical perspectives two decades later. State University of New York Press.
42. Lake, R. 2002: Bring back big government. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26, 815-22.
43. Lake, R. and Newman, K. 2002: Differential citizenship in the shadow state. GeoJournal 58, 109-20.
44. Leitner, H. and Sheppard, E. 1999: Transcending interurban competition: conceptual issues and policy alternatives in the European Union. In Jonas, A. and Wilson, D., editors, The urban growth machine: critical perspectives two decades later, State University of New York Press, 227-43.
45. Lepofsky, J. and Fraser, J. 2003: Building community citizens: claiming the right to place-making in the city. Urban Studies 40, 127-42.
46. MacLeod, G. 2002: From urban entrepreneurialism to a revanchist city? On the spatial injustices of Glasgow's renaissance. Antipode 34, 602-24.
47. Mansbridge, J. 1996: Using power/fighting power: the polity. In Benhabib, S., editor, Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political, Princeton University Press, 46-66.
48. Martin, D. 2003: 'Place-framing' as place-making: constituting a neighborhood for organizing and activism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93, 730-50.
49. Martin, D. 2004: Nonprofit foundations and grassroots organizing: reshaping urban governance. The Professional Geographer 56, 394-405.
50. Mayer, M. 2003: The onward sweep of social capital: causes and consequences for understanding cities, communities and urban movements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27, 110-32.
51. McCann, E. 2003: Framing space and time in the city: urban policy and the politics of spatial and temporal scale. Journal of Urban Affairs 25, 159-78.
52. Merrifield, A. 2002: Dialectical urbanism: social struggles in the capitalist city. Monthly Review Press.
53. Mitchell, D. 2003: The right to the city: social justice and the fight for public space. Routledge.
54. Mitchell, K. 2001: Transnationalism, neo-liberalism, and the rise of the shadow state. Economy and Society 30, 165-89.
55. Newman, K. and Wyly, E. 2005: The right to stay put, revisited: gentrification and resistance to displacement in New York City. Unpublished paper available from the authors.
56. O'Connor, S. 1999: Swimming against the tide. In Ferguson, R. and Dickens, W., editors, Urban problems and community development, Brookings Institution.
57. Peck, J. and Tickell, A. 1994: Searching for a new institutional fix: the after-Fordist crisis and global-local disorder. In Amin, A., editor, Post-Fordism: a reader, Blackwell, 280-315.
58. Peterson, G. 1984: Federalism and the states: an experiment in decentralization. In Palmer, J. and Sawhill, I., editors, The Reagan record: an assessment of America's changing domestic priorities, Ballinger, 217-59.
59. Porter, M. 1995: The competitive advantage of the inner city. Harvard Business Review 73, 55-71.
60. Purcell, M. 2002: Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal 58, 99-108.
61. Putnam, R. 2000: Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
62. Rohe, W. and Bratt, R. 2004: Failures, downsizings, and mergers among community development corporations. Housing Policy Debate 14, 1-46.
63. Rusk, D. 1999: Inside game/outside game: winning strategies for saving urban America. The Brookings Institution.
64. Smith, N. 1996: The new urban frontier: gentrification and the revanchist city. Routledge.
65. Smith, N. 2002: New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy. In Brenner, N. and Theodore, N., editors, Spaces of neoliberalism: urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe, Blackwell, 80-103.
66. Staeheli, L., Kodras, J. and Flint, C., editors 1997: State devolution in America: implications for a diverse society. Sage.
67. Sternlieb, G. 1971: The city as sandbox. The Urban Interest 25, 14-21.
68. Stoker, G. 1998: Governance as theory: five propositions. International Social Science Journal 155, 17-28.
69. Stoecker, R. 1997: The community development corporation model of urban redevelopment: a critique and an alternative. Journal of Urban Affairs 19, 1-23.
70. Stoecker, R. 2003: Understanding the development-organizing dialectic. Journal of Urban Affairs 25, 493-512.
71. Taylor, M. 1992: The changing role of the non-profit sector in Britain: moving toward the market. In Gidron, B., editor, Government and the third sector, Jossey Bass, 147-75.
72. Thomas, F. 1991: Fulfilling America's promise. Speech to the Chicago Council on Urban Affairs, April 23. Ford Foundation.
73. Uitermark, J. 2005: The genesis and evolution of urban policy: a confrontation of regulationist and governmentality approaches. Political Geography 24, 137-63.
74. Vale, L. and Warner, S., editors 2001: Imaging the city: continuing struggles and new directions. Center for Urban Policy Research.
75. Ward, K. 2000: A critique in search of a corpus: revisiting governance and re-interpreting urban politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 25, 169-85.
76. Weber, R. 2002: Extracting value from the city: neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. In Brenner, N. and Theodore, N., editors, Spaces of neoliberalism: urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe, Blackwell, 172-93.
77. Wilson, W. 1997: When work disappears Vintage.
78. Wolch, J. 1990: The shadow state. The Foundation Center.
79. Wyly, E. and Hammel, D. 2005: Mapping neoliberal American urbanism. In Atkinson, R. and Bridge, G., editors, Gentrification in a global context: the urban colonialism, new Routledge, 18-38.
80. Yin, J. 1998: The community development industry system: a case study of politics and institutions in Cleveland, 1967-1997: Journal of Urban Affairs 20, 137-57.
81. Young, I. 2000: Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.