메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 130, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1039-1043

Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: A prospective randomized study

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE COURSE; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOPARATHYROIDISM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE PALSY; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THYROID NODULE; THYROID PAPILLARY CARCINOMA; THYROID WEIGHT; THYROIDECTOMY; TREATMENT INDICATION; TUMOR VOLUME; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 0035666036     PISSN: 00396060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/msy.2001.118264     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (312)

References (11)
  • 11
    • 0031278763 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Our AMES is true: How an old concept still hits the mark: Or, risk groups assignment points the arrow to rational therapy selection in differentiated thyroid cancer (Hayes Martin Lecture)
    • (1997) Am J Surg , vol.174 , pp. 462-468
    • Cady, B.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.