Loudness adaptation in acoustic and electric hearing

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 59-70

  Tang, Qing ^a,b,c   Liu, Sheng ^a,b,c   Zeng, Fan Gang ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California at Irvine   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Loudness; Loudness adaptation; Stimulation mode

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; LOUDNESS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHENOMENOLOGY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACCLIMATIZATION; ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 33644658773     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-005-0023-6     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. BIERER JA, MIDDLEBROOKS JC. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. J. Neurophysiol. 87:478-492, 2002.
2. BIERER JA, MIDDLEBROOKS JC. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 5:32-48, 2004.
3. BRIMACOMBE JA, EISENBERG LS. Tone decay in subjects with the single-channel cochlear implant. Audiology 23:321-332, 1984.
4. BRUCE IC, IRLICHT LS, WHITE MW, O'LEARY SJ, DYNES S, JAVEL E, CLARK GM. A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: pulse-train response. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46:630-637, 1999a.
5. BRUCE IC, WHITE MW, IRLICHT LS, O'LEARY SJ, DYNES S, JAVEL E, CLARK GM. A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: single-pulse response. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46:617-629, 1999b.
6. CARHART R. Clinical determination of abnormal auditory adaptation. AMA Arch. Otolaryngol. 65:32-39, 1957.
7. CARNEY LH. Spatiotemporal encoding of sound level: models for normal encoding and recruitment of loudness. Hear Res. 76:31-44, 1994.
8. CHATTERJEE M. Effects of stimulation mode on threshold and loudness growth in multielectrode cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:850-860, 1999.
9. CHATTERJEE M, SHANNON RV. Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:2565-2572, 1998.
10. CHATTERJEE M, FU QJ, SHANNON RV. Effects of phase duration and electrode separation on loudness growth in cochlear implant listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107:1637-1644, 2000.
11. FLETCHER H. Auditory patterns. Rev. Modern Phys. 12:47-66, 1940.
12. FLETCHER H, MUNSON WA. Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 5:82-108, 1933.
13. FOWLER E. A method for the early detection of otosclerosis. Arch. Otolaryngol. 24:731-741, 1936.
14. GREEN DM. Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87:2662-2674, 1990.
15. GREEN DS. Tone decay. Handbook of clinical audiology. J Katz. New York, Williams & Wilkins, 1985.
16. HELLMAN R, MISKIEWICZ A, SCHARF B. Loudness adaptation and excitation patterns: effects of frequency and level. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:2176-2185, 1997.
17. HONG RS, RUBINSTEIN JT, WEHNER D, HORN D. Dynamic range enhancement for cochlear implants. Otol. Neurotol. 24:590-595, 2003.
18. HOOD JD. Studies in auditory fatigue and adaptation. Acta Otolaryngol., Suppl. 92:1-57, 1950.
19. HOOD JD. Auditory fatigue and adaptation in the differential diagnosis of end-organ disease. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 64:507-518, 1955.
20. HUSS M, MOORE BC. Tone decay for hearing-impaired listeners with and without dead regions in the cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:3283-3294, 2003.
21. ISO. Method for calculating loudness level. International Standardization Organization R532, 1966.
22. JAVEL E. Long-term adaptation in cat auditory-nerve fiber responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:1040-1052, 1996.
23. KRAL A, HARTMANN R, MORTAZAVI D, KLINKE R. Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: the electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents. Hear Res. 121:11-28, 1998.
24. LIM HH, TONG YC, CLARK GM. Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86:971-980, 1989.
25. MIDDLEBROOKS JC. Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and interchannel timing on channel interactions and thresholds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116:452-468, 2004.
26. MIDDLEBROOKS JC, BIERER JA Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level. J. Neurophysiol. 87:493-507, 2002.
27. MILLER CA, ABBAS PJ, NOURSKI KV, HU N, ROBINSON BK. Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties. Hear Res. 175:200-214, 2003.
28. MISKIEWICZ A, HELLMAN R. Frequency and temporal effects in loudness adaptation. In: 15th International Congress on Acoustics 2, 1995.
29. MISKIEWICZ A, SCHARF B, HELLMAN R, MEISELMAN C. Loudness adaptation at high frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94:1281-1286, 1993.
30. MOORE BC. Loudness perception and intensity coding. Hearing, 1995.
31. MOORE BC, GLASBERG BR. A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Hear Res. 188:70-88, 2004.
32. PELIZZONE M. Very high stimulation rates for cochlear implants. In: 4th European Symposium on Pediatric Cochlear Implantation. Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands, 1998.
33. RELKIN EM, DOUCET JR. Is loudness simply proportional to the auditory nerve spike count? J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:2735-2740, 1997.
34. ROBINSON DW, DADSON RS. A redetermination of the equal-loudness relations for the pure tones. Br. J. Appl. Phys. 7:166-181, 1956.
35. RUBINSTEIN JT, WILSON BS, FINLEY CC, ABBAS PJ. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation. Hear Res. 127:108-118, 1999.
36. RUBINSTEIN JT, TYLER RS, JOHNSON A, BROWN CJ. Electrical suppression of tinnitus with high-rate pulse trains. Otol. Neurotol. 24:478-485, 2003.
37. SCHARF B. Loudness adaptation. Hearing research and theory. JV Tobias, ED Schubert. 2, 1983.
38. SCHLAUCH RS, DIGIOVANNI JJ, RIES DT. Basilar membrane nonlinearity and loudness. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:2010-2020, 1998.
39. SCHLAUCH RS, RIES DT, DIGIOVANNI JJ. Duration discrimination and subjective duration for ramped and damped sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109:2880-2887, 2001.
40. SENNAROGLU G, SENNAROGLU L, YUCEL EE, BELGIN E. Cochlear implants: is there any relationship between stimulation rates and adaptation. Otol. Neurotol. 22:634-636, 2001.
41. SHANNON RV. Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants. Hear Res. 18:135-143, 1985.
42. STEVENS SS. Neural events and the psychophysical law. Science 170:1043-1050, 1970.
43. VAN DEN HONERT C, STYPULKOWSKI PH. Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli. Hear Res. 29:207-222, 1987.
44. WABLE J, FRACHET B, GALLEGO S. Tone decay at threshold with auditory electrical stimulation in digisonic cochlear implantees. Audiology 40:265-271, 2001.
45. WILSON BS, FINLEY CC, LAWSON DT, WOLFORD RD, ZERBI M. Design and evaluation of a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implants. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 30:110-116, 1993.
46. WINTER IM, ROBERTSON D, YATES GK Diversity of characteristic frequency rate-intensity functions in guinea pig auditory nerve fibres. Hear Res. 45:191-202, 1990.
47. ZENG FG, SHANNON RV. Loudness-coding mechanisms inferred from electric stimulation of the human auditory system. Science 264:564-566, 1994.
48. ZWICKER E, SCHARF B. A model of loudness summation. Psychol. Rev. 72:3-26, 1965.