Effect of stepped exposure on quantitative in vitro marginal microleakage

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 236-242

  Santos, Alex José Souza ^a   Lisso, Milena Tais ^b   Aguiar, Flávio Henrique Baggio ^c   França, Fabiana Mantovani Gomes ^d   Lovadino, José Roberto ^c  

^a POTIGUAR UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b Campinas State University ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^d SÃO LEOPOLDO MANDIC INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; FILTEK Z250; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SINGLE BOND;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTAL TECHNOLOGY; ENDODONTICS; LIGHT; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHASE TRANSITION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TOOTH DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CATTLE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; LIGHT; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); PHASE TRANSITION; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TECHNOLOGY, DENTAL;

EID: 33644646509     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00120.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Märkl A. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations with and without softstart-polymerization. Oper Dent 2000; 25:26-32.
2. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. Dent Mater 1990; 6:167-171.
3. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restoration. Dent Mater 1991; 7:107-113.
4. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ. Relation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dentinal composite. J Dent Res 1984; 20:146-148.
5. Erickson RL, Glasspoole ES. Bond to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin systems. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6:227-244.
6. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effect of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 2000; 70:812-817.
7. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW, Davis HC. Factors affecting cure at depths within light-activated composites. Am J Dent 1993; 6:91-95.
8. Barros GKP, Aguiar FHB, Santos AJS, Lovadino JR. Effect of different intensity light curing modes on microleakage of two composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 2003; 28:644-648.
9. Uno S, Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99:440-444.
10. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without softstart-polymerization. J Dent 1997; 25:321-330.
11. Koran P, Kürschner R. Effect of sequential versus conventional irradiation of a light-cured resin composite on shrinkage, viscosity, adhesion, and degree of polymerization. Am J Dent 1998; 11(1):17-22.
12. Aguiar FHB, Santos AJS, Groppo FC, Lovadino JR. Quantitative evaluation of marginal leakage of two resin composite restorations using two filling technique. Oper Dent 2002; 27:475-479.
13. Douglas WH, Zakariasen KL. Volumetric assessment of apical leakage utilizing a spectrophotometric dye-recovery method. J Dent Res 1981; 60:438. (Abstr 512)
14. Knezevic A, Tarle Z, Meniga A, Sutalo J, Pichler G. Degree of conversion and temperature rise during polymerization of resin composite samples with blue diodes. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28:586-591.
15. Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts DC. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater 2000; 16:292-296.
16. Unterbrink G, Muessner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent 1995; 23:183-189.
17. Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and the integrity of the restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 1995; 103:322-326.
18. Dennison JB, Yaman P, Seir R, Hamilton JC. Effect of variable light intensity on composite shrinkage. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84:499-505.
19. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1636-1639.
20. Goracci G, Casa de Martinis L, Mori G. Curing light-intensity and marginal leakage of resin composite restoration. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:355-362.
21. Ernst CP, Kurschner R, Rippin G, Willershousen B. Stress reduction in resin-based composites cured with a two-step light-curing unit. Am J Dent 2000; 13(2):69-72
22. Uno S, Tanaka T, Natsuizaka A, Abo T. Effect of slow-curing on cavity wall adaptation using a new intensity-changeable light source. Dent Mater 2003; 19:147-152.
23. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composite for two different curing modes. Dent Mater 1993; 9:2-5.
24. Kinomoto Y, Torjj M. Photoelastic analysis of photopolymerization contraction stresses in the resin composite restorations. J Dent 1998; 26:165-171.
25. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 1998; 77:1435-1445.
26. Yoshikawa T. The effect of curing method and environment on the marginal sealing and wall adaptation of composite restoration. Jpn J Cons Dent 1997; 40:1296-1323.
27. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996; 21:17-24.
28. Bausch JR, De Lange K, Davidson CL, Peters A, De Gee AJ. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48(1):59-67.