Science in touch: Functions of biomedical terminology

Biology and Philosophy

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 815-835

  Hauskeller, C ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Genosemantics; Language of biomedical research; Science and culture; Stem cell research; The mutual influence between biomedicine and its cultural environment

Indexed keywords

TERMINOLOGY;

EID: 33644585163     PISSN: 01693867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10539-004-2280-x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adorno T.W. and Horkheimer M. 1947. Die Dialektik der Aufklärung, Amsterdam; engl.: Dialectic of Enlightenment. Herder & HerderNew York 1972.
2. A. Appadurai 1996 Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis
3. Bahnsen U. 2003. Eierstock aus der Retorte', Die Zeit20/2003. see: http://www.zeit.de/2003/20/Stammzellen.
4. B. Barnes 1974 Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd. London
5. H. Beier 1999 Die Phänomene Totipotenz und Pluripotenz. Von der klassischen Embryologie zu neuen Therapiestrategien Reproduktionsmedizin 15 190-199
6. Beier H. 2002. Totipotenz und Pluripotenz. Von der klassischen Embryologie zu neuen Therapiestrategien. In: Oduncu F., Schroth R. and Vossenkuhl W. (eds), 2002, 36-54.
7. Bender W. 2001. Unbestimmbarkeit des moralischen Status humaner embryonaler Stammzellen? Zu einigen ethischen Problemen. In: Platzer K. and Hö rner V. (eds), Optionen für eine Medizin der Zukunft? Präimplantationsdiagnostik und Stammzellforschung, Vol. 6. Speyrer Texte, 54-65.
8. Bender W. 2002. Ethische Aspekte und gesellschaftliche Folgen der Stammzellforschung. In: Hauskeller C.(eds.) 2002.
9. Best R. and Kushf G. 2005. The Stem Cell Controversy in the United States: Scientific, Philosophical, Political and Theological Aspects. In: Bender W., Hauskeller C. and Manzei A.(eds.) Crossing Borders - kulturellepolitische und religiöse Differenzen betreffend die Stammzellforschung. agenda-Verlag, Münster.
10. M. Black 1962 Models and Metaphors Cornell University Press IthacaNY
11. F.E. Bloom 1999 Breakthroughs 1999 Science 286 2267
12. J.J. Bono 1995 The Word of God and the Languages of Man. Interpreting Nature in Early Modern Science and Medicine University of Wisconsin Press Madison
13. T.R. Brazelton F.M. Rossi G.I. Keshet H.M. Blau 2000 From marrow to brain: Expression of neuronal phenotypes in adult mice Science 290 1775-1779 10.1126/science.290.5497.1775
14. Breuer C. 2001. Die moraltheologische Problematik der In-vitro-Fertilisation, talk published at: http://www.kath-theologie.uni-osnabrueck.de/kug/symposien.htm.
15. T. Burdon 1999 Signaling mechanisms relating self-renewal and differentiation of pluripotent embryonic stem cells Cells Tissues Organs 165 131-141 10.1159/000016693
16. Denker H.W. 2002. Forschung and embryonalen Stammzellen. Eine Diskussion der Begriffe Totipotenz und Pluripotenz. In: Oduncu F., Schroth R. and Vossenkuhl W. (eds), 2002, 19-35.
17. Department of Health 2004. Cloning Issues in Reproduction, Science and Medicine 1998. http://www.advisorybodies.doh.gov.uk/hgac/papers/ papers_c.htm.
18. DFG 1999. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. DFG-Stellungnahme zum Problemkreis humane embryonale Stammzellen. http://www.dfg.de/aktuelles_presse/reden_stellungnahmen/archiv/ humane_embryonak_stammzellen.html.
19. H. Driesch 1891 Entwicklungsmechanische Studien I. Der Werth der beiden ersten Furchungszellen in der Echinodermenentwicklung. Experimentelle Erzeugung von Theil- und Doppelbildungen Zeitschrift wissenschaftliche Zoologie 53 160-184
20. Dupré J.A. 1993. The Disorder of Things. Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Harvard University Press.
21. Epstein S. 1996. Impure Science, AIDS, Activism, And The Politics of Knowledge. University of California Press.
22. L. Fleck 1935 Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache [L. Schäfer and T. Schnelle 1999], New Edition Suhrkamp Verlag Frankfurt am Main
23. Franklin S. 2003. Kinship, Genes, and Cloning. Life after Dolly. In: Goodman A.H., Heath D. and Lindee S. (eds). 2003.
24. Fujimura J.H. 2003. Future Imagineries, Genome Scientists as Sociocultural Entrepreneurs. In: Goodman A.H., Heath D. and Lindee S. (eds). 2003.
25. A.H. Goodmann D. Heath S. Lindee 2003 Genetic Nature/Culture. Anthropology and Science beyond the Two-culture Divide University of California Press Berkeley
26. Griffiths P. and Stotz K. 2003. Representing Genes Project. http://www.pitt.edu/kstotz/genes/genes.html.
27. C. Hauskeller 2002 Humane Stammzellen. therapeutische Optionen, ökonomische Perspektiven, mediale Vermittlung Pabst Science Publishers Lengerich
28. Hauskeller C. 2004. How Traditions of Ethical Reasoning and Institutional Processes Shape Stem Cell Research in Britain. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Accepted for publication.
29. M. Hesse 1966 Models and Analogies in Science Sheed and Ward London & New York
30. K. Hübner 2003 Derivation of oocytes from mouse embryonic stem cells Science 300 1251-1256
31. Kitcher P. 1984. Species. In: Kitcher P. (ed.), In Mendel's Mirror. Philosophical Reflections on Biology. Oxford University Press.
32. G.C. Kopen D.J. Prockop D.G. Phinney 1999 Marrow stromal cells migrate throughout forebrain and cerebellumand they differentiate into astrocystes after injection into neonatal mouse brains Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 10711-10716 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10711
33. C. Kummer 2000 Stammzellkulturen-ein brisantes Entwicklungspotential Stimmen der Zeit 218 547-554
34. G. Majo 2001 Das Klonen im öffentlichen Diskurs. Über den Beitrag der Massenmedien zur Bioethikdiskussion Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik 47 33-52
35. Martin E. 1996. The egg and the sperm. How science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male-female roles. In: Keller E. and Longino H. (eds), Feminism and Science. Oxford University Press.
36. M. Mulkay 1979 Science and the Sociology of Knowledge Allen and Unwin London
37. M. Mulkay 1997 The embryo research debate University of Cambridge Press Cambridge
38. NBAC 1999. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Ethical Issues in Human Stem cell ResearchVol. 1, Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission RockvilleMaryland: September 1999.
39. F. Oduncu R. Schroth W. Vossenkuhl 2002 Stammzellforschung und therapeutisches Klonen Vandenhoek und Ruprecht Göttingen
40. M. Pesce 1999 Lessons of totipotency from embryonic stem cells Cells Tissues Organs 165 144-152 10.1159/000016694
41. PCB 2002. President's Council on Bioethics, Human Cloning and Human Dignity, Public Affairs, New York
42. Pickstone J.V. 2000. Ways of Knowing. A New History of Science, Technology and Medicine. Manchester University Press.
43. Rheinberger H.-J. 2000. Gene-concepts: Fragments form the perspective of molecular biology. In: Beurton P., Falk R. and Rheinberger H.-J. (eds), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution. Historical and Epistemological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
44. F. Seidel 1952 Die Entwicklungspotenzen einer isolierten Blastomere des Zweizell-stadiums im Säugetierei Naturwissenschaften 39 355
45. S.L. Star J. Griesemer 1989 Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39 Soc. Stud. Sci. 19/3 387-420
46. B.J. Strasser 2003 Who cares about the double helix? Collective memory links the past to the future in science as well as history Nature 422 803-804 10.1038/422803a
47. J.A. Thomson 1998 Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts Science 282 1145-1147 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145
48. G. Vogel 1999 Capturing the promise of youth Science 286 2238-2239
49. B. Vogelstein B. Alberts K. Shine 2003 Please don't call it cloning! Science 295 1237
50. Mary Warnock 1985 A Question of Life. The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology Basil Blackwell Ltd. Oxford
51. D. Woodbury E.J. Schwarz D.J. Prockop I.B. Black 2000 Adult rat and human bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neurons J. Neurosci. Res. 61 364-370 10.1002/ 1097-4547(20000815)61:4<364::AID-JNR2>3.0.CO;2-C
52. Wulff H.J. 2002. Zwischen Phantasie und Diskurs - Motive als Topoi in den Spielfilmen und journalistischen Texten der Gentechnik. In: Hauskeller C.(ed). 2002.