An integrated decision support framework for the assessment and analysis of hydrogen production pathways

Energy and Fuels

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 346-352

  Chui, F ^a   Elkamel, A ^a   Fowler, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ELECTROLYSIS; FOSSIL FUELS; GAS EMISSIONS; HYDROGEN; LIFE CYCLE; METHANE; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION PATHWAYS; INTEGRATED DECISION SUPPORT FRAMEWORK; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS (LCA); STEAM METHANE REFORMING (SMR);

HYDROGEN FUELS;

EID: 33644551840     PISSN: 08870624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ef050196u     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ogden, J. M. Developing an infrastructure for hydrogen vehicles: A Southern California case study. Hydrogen Energy 1999, 24, 709-730.
2. Joffe, D.; Hart, D.; Bauen, A. Modelling of hydrogen infrastructure for vehicle refuelling in London. Power Sources 2004, 131, 13-22.
3. Feck, T.; Heinemann, D.; Steinberger-Wilckens, R.; Stolzenburg, K. Eco-Balances for Supply Paths of Hydrogen Fuel. Proceedings of the HYPOTHESIS IV: Hydrogen Based Traffic-An Option for Introducing Wind Energy to the Transport Market; 2001.
4. General Motors Corporation, BP, ExxonMobil, Shell. Well-to-Wheel Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems - North American Analysis; 2001; Volume 3. http://www.eere.energy.gov/ hydrogenandfuelcells/hydrogen_publications.html (accessed July 2005).
5. Koroneos, C.; Dompros, A.; Roumbas, G.; Moussiopoulos, N. Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Fuel Production Processes. Hydrogen Energy 2004, 29, 1443-1450.
6. S&T Consultants, Inc. Hydrogen Pathways: Greenhouse Gas Emission and Energy Use; 2003. http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/es/etb/ctfca/PDFs/english/ GHG-Energy-Use.htm (accessed July 2005).
7. Saaty, T. L. Scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 1977, 1513, 234-281.
8. Saaty, T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1980.
9. Saaty, T. L.; Vargas, L. G. Inconsistency and rank preservation. J. Math. Psychol. 1984, 28, 2.
10. Saaty, T. L.; Kearns, K. P. Analytical Planning: The Organization of Systems; International Series in Modern Applied Mathematics and Computer Science; Pergamon Press: New York, 1985; Vol. 7.
11. Zahedi, F. The analytic hierarchy process - A survey of the method and its applications. Interfaces 1986, 1614, 96-108.
12. Larminie, J.; Dicks, A. Fuel Cell Systems Explained, 2nd ed.; Wiley & Sons: New York, 2003.
13. Argonne National Laboratories. GREET 1.5 - Transportation Fuel-Cycle Model; 1999. http://www.transportation.an1.gov/software/GREET/pdfs/ esd_4vl.pdf (accessed July 2005).
14. McLean, H. L.; Lave, L. B. Evaluating automobile propulsion system technologies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2002, 29, 1-69.
15. EPA. Life cycle assessment: Inventory guidelines and principles; EPA Report EPA/60OR-92/245, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development: Washington, DC, 1993.
16. Independent Electricity Market Operator. 10 Year Outlook Highlights: An Assessment of the Adequacy of Generation and Transmission Facilities to Meet Future Electricity Needs in Ontario; 2004. http://www.theimo.com/ imoweb/pubs/marketReports/10YearOutlook_2004mar.pdf (accessed July 2005).