Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies

Progress in Energy and Combustion Science

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-69

  MacLean, Heather L ^a   Lave, Lester B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIESEL FUELS; ELECTRIC MOTORS; ELECTRICITY; EXTRAPOLATION; GAS EMISSIONS; GASOLINE; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; IGNITION; NATURAL GAS; PROPULSION; TRUCKS; VEHICLES;

POLLUTION EMISSIONS;

AUTOMOTIVE FUELS;

EID: 0037238524     PISSN: 03601285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1285(02)00032-1     Document Type: Review

References (187)

1. US Environmental Protection Agency. US National Emissions, Carbon Dioxide Emissions. www.epa.gov/globalwarming/emissions/national/co2.html . Accessed August 1, 2002.
2. US Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts 2000. www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/pubs/1.pdf . Accessed August 1, 2000.
3. Business Communications Co., Inc. New transportation fuels: trends and developments. www.the-infoshop.com/study/bc5767_transportation_fuel.html ; 2001.
4. Davis SC. Center for Transportation Analysis. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy. ORNL-6966; 2001.
5. MacLean H.L., Lave L.B. A life cycle model of an automobile. Environ Sci Technol. 32:1998;322A-333A.
6. Schrank D, Lomax T. Urban Mobility Report. Texas Transportation Institute. Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX; May 2001.
7. Hellman KH, Heavenrich RM. Light-duty automotive technology and fuel economy trends 1975 through 2001. Advanced Technology Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, US Environmental Protection Agency; September 2001.
8. National Research Council. Effectiveness and impact of corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards. Committee on Effectiveness and Impact of CAFE Standards, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC; 2001.
9. Greene D.L. Transportation and energy. 1996;Eno Transportation Foundation, Landsdowne, VA.
10. Lave L., MacLean H., Hendrickson C., Lankey R. Life-cycle analysis of alternative automobile fuel/propulsion technologies. Environ Sci Technol. 34:(17):2000;3598-3605.
11. Lave L.B. Science. 212:1981;893.
12. Lave L.B. The strategy of social regulation: decision frameworks for policy. 1981;The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
13. Office of Technology Assessment of the US Congress. Environmental Policy Tools: A User's Guide. OTS-ENV-634. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. September 1995.
14. Argonne National Laboratory. www.anl.gov . Accessed November 11, 2001.
15. United States Council for Automotive Research. US Car Field Study aims to further reduce amount of vehicle plastic waste; Spring 1999 Newsletter. www.uscar.org/techno/fieldtrial.htm . Accessed November 15, 2001.
16. Rubin E.S., Davidson C.I. Introduction to engineering & the environment. 2001;McGraw Hill, New York.
17. Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program. Technical Bulletin No. 15. Exhaust emissions of compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles compared with gasoline vehicles; July 1995.
18. Transportation Statistics Annual Report 1999. Figs. 5-10. p. 120. US Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Washington, DC. BTS99-03; 1999.
19. US Environmental Protection Agency. www.epa.gov . Accessed July 14, 2001.
20. US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Atmospheric Programs. Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2000. EPA 430-R-02-003; April 2000.
21. Transportation Research Board. Toward a sustainable future. Addressing the long-term effects of motor vehicle transportation on climate and ecology. Special Report 251. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.
22. Energy Information Administration. www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/primer.html . Accessed August 23, 2001. Electric power industry generation by energy source; 1998. Electric Power Annual 1998. vol. II, Table 1. p. 12-3.
23. Herzog H. What future for carbon capture and sequestration. Environ Sci Technol. 35:2001;148A-153A.
24. Our common future. 1987;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
25. Lave L.B., Griffin W.M., MacLean H.L. The ethanol answer to carbon emissions. Issues Sci Technol. 18:(2):2002;73-78.
26. MacLean HL, Lave L, Griffin M, Joshi S. Evaluation of lignocellulosic ethanol to fuel the USA-Canadian light duty transportation fleet. Society of Automotive Engineers Environmental and Sustainability Conference, April 8-10, 2002, Graz, Austria; 2001.
27. Stikkers D. The unintended consequences of reformulated gasoline. Fischbeck P.S., Farrow R.S. Resources for the future. Resources for the future. September 1995;US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
28. Partnership for a new generation of vehicles. www.ta.doc.gov/pngv . August 21, 2001.
29. Gruenspecht H. Differentiated regulation: the case of auto emissions standards. Am Econ Rev. 1982;328-331.
30. Bresnahan T.F., Yao D.A. The nonpecuniary costs of automobile emissions standards. Rand J Econom. 16:(4):1985;437-455.
31. Yao D. Strategic responses to automobile emissions control: a game-theoretic analysis. J Environ Econ Mgmt. 15:1988;419-438.
32. McConnell V, Harrington W. Cost effectiveness of enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance programs. Discussion Paper QE92-18 Rev. Resources for the future, Washington, DC; 1992.
33. Lave L.B., Hendrickson C.T., McMichael F.C. Environmental implications of electric vehicles. Science. 268:1995;993-995.
34. Howard J. ABC News. California Bans MTBE by 2002. www.abcnews.go.com/sections.science/DailyNews/fueladditive990325.html ; March 25, 1999 [Accessed August 27, 2001].
35. US Environmental Protection Agency. The benefits and costs of the clean air act, 1970 to 1990. www.epa.gov/air/sect812/r-140.html . Accessed October 15, 2001.
36. Diamond P.A., Hausman J.A. Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? J Econ Perspect. 8:(4):1994;45-64.
37. Hanemann W.M. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. J Econ Perspect. 8:(4):1994;19-43.
38. Portney P.R. The contingent valuation debate: why economists should care. J Econ Perspect. 8:(4):1994;3-17.
39. Matthews H.S., Lave L.B. Applications of environmental valuation for determining externality costs. Environ Sci Technol. 34:2000;1390-1395.
40. Small K.A., Kazimi C. On the costs of air pollution from motor vehicles. J Transport Econ Policy. 29:(7):1995.
41. Hahn R.W. Economic prescriptions for environmental problems: how the patient followed the Doctor's orders. J Econ Perspect. 3:(2):1998;69-88.
42. 2 allowance trading. J Econ Perspect. 12:(3):1998;39-88.
43. Hahn R.W. Reviving regulatory reform: A global Perspective. AEI-Brookings Institute for Regulatory Studies. 2000;The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC.
44. Morgenstern R.D. Economics analyses at EPA: assessing regulatory impact. Resources for the future, Washington, DC. Resources for the future, Washington, DC. 1997.
45. Schmalensee P.L., Joskow P.L., Ellerman D., Montero J.P., Bailer E.M. An interim evaluation of sulfur dioxide emissions trading. J Econ Perspect. 12:(3):1998;53-68.
46. Morgan M.G., Henrion M. Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. 1990;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
47. Epple D., Lave L.B. Scenario analysis in Kates. Kates R., Ausubel J., Berberian M. Climate impact analysis. 1985;Wiley, London.
48. Fava J.A., Denison R., Jones B., Curran M.A., Vigon B., Selke S., Barnum J. A technical framework for life cycle assessment. 1994;Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Washington, DC.
49. Keoleian G.A., Meneray D. Life cycle design guidance manual: environmental requirements and the product system. US Environmental Protection Agency. 1993;US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. EPA 600-R-92-226.
50. Vigon BW, Tolle DA, Cornaby BW, Latham HC, Harrison CL, Boguski TL, Hunt RG, Sellers JD. Life cycle assessment: inventory guidelines and principles. US Environmental Protection Agency, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. EPA/600/R-91/245; 1993.
51. Curran M.A. Curran M.A. The history of LCA, environmental life cycle assessment. 1996;McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
52. Keoleian G.A., Menerey D. Sustainable development by design: review of life cycle design and related approaches. Air Waste. 44:1994;645-667.
53. Lindfors L.G., Christiansen K., Hoffman L., Virtanen Y., Juntilla V., Hanssen O.-J., Ronning A., Ekvall T., Finnveden G. Nordic guidelines on life-cycle assessment, volo. 20; 1995. 1995;Nordic Council of Ministers, Nord, Arhus.
54. Lave L.B., Cobas-Flores E., Hendrickson C.T., McMichael F.C. Using input-output analysis to estimate economy-wide discharges. ES&T. 29:1995;420A-426A.
55. Horvath A., Hendrickson C., Lave L., McMichael F.C., Wu T.-S. Toxic emission indices for green design and inventory. Environ Sci Technol. 1995.
56. Newell S., Zuckerman B., Field F., Clark J. Life cycle analysis methodology incorporating social cost as a valuation metric. Materials Systems Laboratory. February 1998;Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
57. Portney P.R. The price is right: making use of life cycle analysis. Issues Sci Technol. 10:(2):1993;69-75.
58. Arnold F. Environ Forum. 1993.
59. Hocking M.B. Net energy expenditure: a method for assessing the environmental impact of technologies. Measures of environmental performance and ecosystem condition. 1999;National Academy Press, Washington, DC. p. 15-28.
60. Hocking M.B. Paper versus polystyrene: a complex choice. Science. 251:1991;504-505.
61. Wells H.A., McCubbin N., Cavaney R., Camo B., Hocking M.B. Paper versus polystyrene: environmental impact (letters). Science. 252:(7):1991;1361-1363.
62. Joshi S. Product environmental life-cycle assessment using input-output techniques. J Ind Ecol. 3:(2/3):2000;95-120.
63. Hendrickson C., Horvath A., Joshi S., Lave L. Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment. Environ Sci Technol. 1998;184A-191A.
64. Carnegie Mellon University Green Design Initiative. Economic input output life cycle analysis model. www.eiolca.net. Accessed November 12, 2001.
65. Delucchi M. Emissions of greenhouse gases from the use of transportation fuels and electricity. Main text. vol. 1:1997;Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL. ANL/ESD/TM-22.
66. Wang MQ. GREET 1.5 - transportation fuel-cycle model, vol. 1: methodology, development, use and results. Argonne National Laboratory, Center for Transportation Research. ANL/ESD-39; 1999.
67. Hellman K.H., Murrell J.D., Cheng J.P. Trends in alternate measures of vehicle fuel economy. 1986;Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA. 861426.
68. MacLean H.L., Lave L.B. Environ Sci Technol. 34:2000;225.
69. Weiss M.A., Heywood J.B., Drake E.M., Schafer A., AuYeung F.F. On the road in 2020: a life cycle analysis of new automobile technologies. Energy Laboratory Report MIT EL 00-003. October 2000;Energy Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
70. General Motors Corporation, Argonne National Laboratory, BP, Exxon Mobil and Shell, vol. 1. Well-to-wheel energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems - North American Analysis. Executive Summary Report; April 2001.
71. Delucchi M.S. Emission of greenhouse gases from the use of transportation fuels and electricity. Main text. vol. 1:1991;US Department of Commerce, NTIS, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne IL.
72. Poulton M.L. Alternative fuels for road vehicles. 1994;Computational Mechanics Publications, Boston, MA.
73. Kreiger RB, Steward RM, Pinson JA, Gallopoulos NE, Hilden DL, Monroe DR, Rask RB, Solomon ASP, Zima P. Diesel engines: one option to power future personal transportation vehicles. Proceedings of the 1997 Diesel Engine Emissions Reduction Workshop. University of California, San Diego. La Jolla, CA; July 28-31, 1997. p. 171-99.
74. Eberhardt J.J. The dieselization of America: an integrated strategy for future transportation fuels. Proceedings of the diesel engine emissions reduction workshop. July 28-31, 1997;University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA. p. 1-7.
75. Kreucher WM. Economic, environmental and energy life-cycle inventory of automotive fuels. SAE 982218.
76. Sullivan JL, Costic MM, Han W. Automotive life cycle assessment: overview, metrics and examples. SAE 980467.
77. Brekken M, Durbin E. An analysis of the true efficiency of alternative vehicle powerplants and alternative fuels. SAE 981399; 1998.
78. Hackney J., de Neufville R. Life cycle model of alternative fuel vehicles: emissions, energy and cost trade-offs. Tranport Res, Part A. 35:2001;243-266.
79. Pembina Institute. Climate-friendly hydrogen fuel: a comparison of the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions for selected fuel cell vehicle hydrogen production systems. Drayton Valley, AB; March 2000.
80. Lave L.B., MacLean H.L. An environmental-economic evaluation of hybrid electric vehicles: Toyota's Prius vs. its conventional internal combustion engine Corolla. Transport Res, Part D. 7:2002;155-162.
81. Lave L, MacLean H. An environmental-economic evaluation of hybrid electric and other advanced vehicles. SAE Environmental Sustainability Conference, April 8-10, 2002, Graz, Austria; 2001.
82. Guibet J.-C. Fuels and engines. Technology. Energy environment. 2 vols:1999;Technip, Paris, France.
83. US Department of Energy. www.doe.gov . Accessed July 20, 2001.
84. Owen K., Coley T. Automotive fuels reference book. 2nd ed: 1995;Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.
85. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Alternative Fuels Data Center. www.afdc.nrel.doe.gov/altfuels.html . Accessed July 15, 2001.
86. Chigier N.A. Energy, combustion and the environment. 1981;McGraw Hill, New York.
87. Stone R. Introduction to internal combustion engines. 3rd ed: 1999;Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.
88. Gary J.H., Handwerk G.E. Petroleum refining technology and economics. 4th ed: 2001;Marcel Dekker, New York.
89. Delucchi M.A. A revised model of emissions of greenhouse gases from the use of transportation fuels and electricity. 1997;Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, CA. UCD-ITS-RR-97-8.
90. Bowman F.M., Seinfeld J.H. Atmospheric chemistry of alternate fuels and reformulated gasoline components. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 21:1995;387-417.
91. Auto/Oil Industry Air Quality Improvement Research Program Final Report; January 1997.
92. Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program. Technical Bulletin No. 17. Gasoline Reformulation and Vehicle Technology Effects on Exhaust Emissions; August 1995.
93. Kirchstetter T.W., Singer B.C., Harley R.A., Kendall G.R., Chan W. Impact of oxygenated gasoline use on California light-duty vehicle emissions. ES&T. 30:1996;661-670.
94. National Institute for Petroleum and Energy Research. Prepared for US DOE. Bartlesville Project Office. Effects of a California Phase 2 Reformulated Gasoline on Exhaust Emissions and Vehicle Performance. NIPER/BDM-0251. Bartlesville, OK; September 1996.
95. California Air Resources Board. www.arb.gov . Accessed July 30, 2001.
96. US Environmental Protection Agency. Staff Paper on Gasoline Sulfur Issues. US EPA Office of Mobile Sources; May 1, 1998. EPA 420-R-98-005.
97. Keller A, Froines J, Koshland C, Reuter J, Suffet I, Last J. Health and environmental assessment of MTBE. Report to the Governor and Legislature of the State of California as sponsored by SB521, vol. 1. Summary and Recommendations; November 1998.
98. California Energy Commission. Supply and Cost of Alternatives to MTBE in Gasoline. Staff Report; October 1998. P300-98-013.
99. California Energy Commission. Supply and Cost of Alternatives to MTBE in Gasoline. Technical Appendices. Staff Report; October 1998. P300-98-013B.
100. Sheehan J, Camobreco V, Duffield J, Graboski M, Shapouri H. Life cycle inventory of biodiesel and petroleum diesel for use in an urban bus. Final Report. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO; 1998. NREL/SR-580-24089.
101. 2 ) Consultants Inc. Liquid fuels from biomass: North America. Impact of non-technical barriers on implementation. Prepared for the IEA Bioenergy Task 27; September 15, 2000.
102. Cannon J.S. Harnessing hydrogen: the key to sustainable transportation. 1995;INFORM Inc, New York, NY.
103. Pace University Center for Environmental Legal Studies. Environmental Costs of Electricity. Prepared for New York State Research and Development Authority and US Department of Energy. Oceans Publications, Inc., NY; 1990.
104. Ogden J.M., Steinbugler M.M., Kreutz T.G. A comparison of hydrogen, methanol, and gasoline as fuels for fuel cell vehicles: implications for vehicle design and infrastructure development. J Power Sources. 79:1999;143-168.
105. Thomas CE, James BD, Lomax FD, Kuhn IF. Societal impacts of fuel options for fuel cell vehicles. Society of Automotive Engineer. Presented at the SAE International Fall Fuels and Lubricants Meeting and Exposition, San Francisco, CA; October 19-22, 1998. 982496.
106. Thomas CE, James BD, Lomax FD, Kuhn IF. Fuel options for the fuel cell vehicle: hydrogen, methanol, or gasoline? Presented at the Fuel Cell Reformer Conference. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA; November 1998.
107. Casten S., Teagan P., Stobart R. Fuels for fuel-cell powered vehicles. 2000;Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc, Warrendale, PA.
108. Lave L.B., Hendrickson C.T., McMichael F.C. Environmental implications of electric vehicles. Response Lett. Science. 1995;731-745.
109. Heywood J.B. The internal combustion engine fundamentals. 1988;McGraw-Hill, New York.
110. Bosch R. Automotive handbook. 5th ed: 2000;Bentley Publishers.
111. Lumley J.L. Engines: an introduction. 1999;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
112. Zhao F., Lai M.-C., Harrington D.L. Automotive spark-ignited direct-injection gasoline engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 25:1999;437-562.
113. Harms K. Perspectives in Automotive Control. Third IFAC Workshop. Advances in automotive control, Karlsruhe, Germany; 28-30 March, 2001.
114. Peppley, Royal Military College, Kingston, Ont. Oral presentation. University of Toronto Fuel Cells Conference, Toronto, Ont.; July 2001.
115. Koltsakis G.C., Stamatelos A.M. Catalytic automotive exhaust after treatment. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 23:1997;1-39.
116. California Air Resources Board. Ca ARB Releases Draft Risk Reduction Plan for Diesel PM Emissions. www.dieselnet.com/news/000/carb.html ; 1998. Accessed August 27, 2001.
117. Health Effects Institute. Health Effects Institute, Executive Summary: Diesel Exhaust: Critical Analysis of Emissions, Exposure, and Health Effects; 1995.
118. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. NIEHS Press Release. Fact sheet: The Report on Carcinogens. 9th ed. www.niehs.nih.gov/oc/news/9thROC.htm ; May 15, 2000. Accessed August 27, 2001.
119. Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program. Technical Bulletin No. 11. A study of fuel effects on emissions from high emitting vehicles; December 1992.
120. An F, Barth M, Ross M. Vehicle total life-cycle exhaust emissions. SAE 951856.
121. Ross M., Goodwin R., Watkins R., Wenzel T., Wang M.Q. Real-world emissions from conventional passenger cars. J Air Waste Mgmt Assoc. 48:1998;502-515.
122. Ross M., Goodwin R., Watkins R., Wang M.Q., Wenzel T. Real world emissions from model Year 1993, 2000 and 2010 passenger cars. November 1995;American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Washington, DC.
123. Wenzel T, Ross M. Characterization of recent model high-emitting automobiles. SAE 981414.
124. Cadle S.H., Gorse R.A. Jr., Belian T.C., Lawson D.R. Real-world vehicle emissions: a summary of the eighth coordinating research council on-road vehicle emissions workshop. J Air Waste Mgmt Assoc. 49:1999;242-255.
125. Keoleian GA, Kar K, Manion MM, Bulkley JW. Industrial ecology of the automobile: a life cycle perspective. SAE. Warrendale, PA; 1997. 148 p.
126. Graedel T.E., Allenby B.R. Industrial ecology and the automobile. Lucent technologies. 1998;Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
127. Rebitzer G, Fleischer G. Identifying the environmental impact drivers and tradeoff options in the life cycle of automobiles - a software based methodology for the sound restriction of system boundaries. SAE 2000-01-1493.
128. Sullivan J.L., Hu J. Proceedings of the 1995 total life cycle conference. October 1995;Society of Automobile Engineers, Warrendale, PA. p. 147-57.
129. Stodolsky F, Vyas A, Cuenca R, Gaines L. Life-cycle energy savings potential from aluminum - intensive vehicles. SAE 951837.
130. Finkbeiner M, Ruhland K, Cetiner H, Binder M, Stark B. Life cycle engineering as a tool for design for environment. SAE 2000-01-1491.
131. Friedrich J, Krasowski H. Life cycle engineering - advantages for economy and ecology. SAE 2000-01-1472.
132. Harsch M. Life cycle simulation as R&D tool. SAE 2000-01-1500.
133. Hentges SG. Data categories, data quality and allocation procedures. SAE 982162.
134. Saur K, Finkbeiner M, Hoffman R. How to handle uncertainties and assumptions in interpreting LCA results? SAE 982210.
135. Steele N.L.C., Allen D.T. An abridged life-cycle assessment of electric vehicle batteries. EX&T News. 1998;40A-46A.
136. Lave L.B., Russel A.G., Hendrickson C.T., McMichael F.C. ES&T. 30:1996;402A.
137. Roque J.A. Electric vehicle manufacturing in southern California: local versus regional environmental hazards. Environ Plan A. 27:(6):1995;907-932.
138. Saur K., Fava J.A., Spatari S. Life cycle engineering case study: automobile fender designs. Environ Prog. 19:(2):2000;72-82.
139. Gibson TL. Life cycle assessment of advanced materials for automotive applications. SAE 2000-01-1486.
140. Keoleian G.A., Spartari S., Beal R., Stephens R., Williams R. Application of life cycle inventory analysis to fuel tank system design. Int J LCA. 3:(1):1998;18-28.
141. Young S.B., Vanderburg W.H. Applying environmental life-cycle analysis to materials. JOM. 1994.
142. Kirkpatrick N, Dowdell D, Glazebrook B. A life cycle assessment of the implications of implementing the proposed end of life vehicles directive in the United Kingdom. SAE 2000-01-1468.
143. Lazzarri S, Levizzari, A. Life cycle costing as a new tool matching economical and environmental evaluations: the experience on a real case study. SAE 2000-01-1466.
144. Sullivan JL, Williams RL, Yester S, Cobas-Flores E, Chubbs ST, Hentges SG, Pomper SD. Society of Automotive Engineers (Special Publication). SAE 982160; 1998.
145. LCA on the Third SAE Conference on Total Life cycle in Graz, Austria. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1999; 4(2): 121-2. www.ange.wandte-limndogie.de/journals/lca/conference/saerep.htm . Accessed August 28, 2001.
146. Schweimer G, SchuckertM. Life cycle inventory of a golf. Forschungsbericht Nr.K, EFVT 9604 V/5. Volkswagen Konzernforschung, Wolfsburg, Germany; 1996.
147. Sullivan JL, Cobas-FloresE. Full vehicle LCAs: a review. Society of Automotive Engineers. Environmental Sustainability Conference, Graz, Austria. 2001-01-3725.
148. Fuel Supply Database Documentation. Fuel Strategy Database Development Project. Prepared for US Department of Energy, Washington, DC. Revised Report; February 1999. Energy and Environmental Analysis.
149. Delucchi M. Emissions of greenhouse gases from the use of transportation fuels and electricity. Appendixes A-S. vol. 2:1993;US Department of Commerce NTIS, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.
150. DelucchiM.A. A lifecycle emissions analysis: urban air pollutants and greenhouse-gases from petroleum, natural gas, LPG, and other fuels for highway vehicles, forklifts, and household heating in the US. World Res Rev. 13:(1):2001;25-51.
151. Cruickshank WH. Natural Resources Canada. Ottawa, ON, Canada. Personal Communication; March 2001.
152. Personal communication with Don O'Connor. Levelton Engineering Ltd, Vancouver, BC; 1999.
153. Argonne National Laboratory, Total energy assessment of electric and conventional vehicles: an energy and environmental analysis. Technical Report. Prepared for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. vol. I:1998;US Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
154. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. A comparative analysis of the environmental outputs of future biomass-ethanol production cycles and crude oil/reformulated gasoline production cycles. Appendixes. Prepared for the US Department of Energy, Office of Transportation Technologies and Office of Planning and Assessment, Golden, CO; December 1991.
155. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Fuel Cycle Evaluations of Biomass-Ethanol and Reformulated Gasoline. Prepared for US Department of Energy, Office of Transportation Technologies and Office of Planning and Assessment, Golden, CO; October 1992.
156. 2 emissions. May 1992;ArthurD. Little, Inc, Cambridge, MA.
157. BroganJ., VenkateswaranS.R. Diverse choices for electric and hybrid motor vehicles: implications for national planners. May 1992;Presented at the Urban Electric Vehicle Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.
158. Ecotraffic AB. Motor fuels from sources to final use. Final Report on an Energy and Emissions System Study. Stockholm, Sweden; March 1992.
159. WangM.Q., SantiniD.J. Magnitude and value of electric vehicle emissions reductions for six driving cycles in four US cities with varying air quality problems. Transport Res Record. 1416:1993;33-42.
160. Darrow K.G. Light-duty vehicle fuel-cycle emission analysis. Prepared by Energy International Inc., Bellevue, WA. April 1994;For Gas Research Institute, Chicago, IL.
161. DarrowK.G. Comparison of fuel-cycle emissions for electric vehicles and ultra-low emissions natural gas vehicles. Prepared by Energy International Inc., Bellevue, WA. May 1994;For Southern California Gas Company, Los Angeles, CA.
162. Evaluation of fuel-cycle emissions on a reactivity basis. vol. 1:September 1996;Prepared for California Air Resources Board, El Monte, CA. FR-96-114.
163. International Energy Agency. Automotive fuels for the future: the search for alternatives. IEA-AFIS, Paris; August 1999.
164. Levelton Engineering Ltd. Alternative and future fuels and energy sources for road vehicle. Prepared for Transportation Issue Table. National Climate Change Process, Canada.
165. Joshi S, Lave L, MacLean H, LankeyR. A life cycle comparison of alternative transportation fuels. SAE; 2000.
166. 2 Consultants, Inc. Prepared for Methanex Corporation. Assessment of Emissions of Greenhouse Gases from Fuel Cell Vehicles; June 5, 2000.
167. Guzzella L. Amstutz. Quasi-Stationaren-Simulations. Matlab programs and text. Benutzeranleitung. 1998;Laboratorium fur Motorsysteme, Institute fur Energietechnik, ETH-Zurich.
168. ArthurD. Little, Inc. Integrated fuel chain analysis model (IFCAM) user instructions for version3.1. Report to Ford Motor Company; February 27, 1996.
169. Thomas CE, James BD, Kuhn IF, Lomax FD. Hydrogen infrastructure costs for fuel cell vehicles. Presented at the ninth Canadian hydrogen conference, Vancouver, BC; February 1999.
170. Baker R, Barker T, GreenfieldN. Ford Motor Company, Detroit, MI. Personal Communication; 1999.
171. Brinkman N, Hilden D, Krieger R, Monroe D, OhS. General Motors, Warren, MI. Personal Communication with Brinkman; 1999.
172. Makino E, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Alsungi-City, Kanagawa, Japan. Fax Communication; 1999.
173. Hoehlein B, et al. Brenstoffzelen-Studie: Ganzheitliche Systemuntersuchung zur Energiewandlung durch Brennstoffzellen. Forschungsvereinigung Verbrennungskraftmaschinene.V., Frankfurt am Main; 1998.
174. CummingsR., BrookshireD.S., SchultzeW.D. Valuing environmental goods: an assessment of the contingent valuation method. 1986;Rowman & Allanheld, Totowa, NJ.
175. DelucchiM. Lifecycle energy use, greenhouse-gas emissions and air pollution from the use of transportation fuels and electricity. 1998;Institute for Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.
176. US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air and Radiation. Air Quality and Planning and Standards. National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report, 1997. 454/R-98-016; December 1998.
177. Freeman III AM. The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Resources for the future. Washington, DC; 1994.
178. General Motors Corporation, Argonne National Laboratory, BP, Exxon Mobil and Shell, vol.2. Well-to-Wheel Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems - North American Analysis; June 2001.
179. Kreucher WM, Han WL, Schuetzle D, Qiming Z, Alin Z, Ruilan Z, Baiming S, WeissM. Economic, environmental and energy life-cycle assessment of coal conversion to automotive fuels in China. SAE 982207; 1998.
180. Field III FR, Isaacs JA, Clark JP. Life cycle analysis of automobiles: a critical review of methodologies. JOM 46(4). Warrendale, PA; April 1994.
181. GorseR. Ford Motor Company. Personal communication with author. May 1998.
182. ErdalS., GoldsteinB.D. Methyl tert-butyl ether as a gasoline oxygenate: lessons for environmental public policy. Ann Rev Energy Environ. 25:2000;765-802.
183. Ogden JM, Kreutz TG, SteinbuglerM. Fuels for fuel cell vehicles: vehicle design and infrastructure issues. Report No. 982500. Presented at Society of Automotive Engineers International Fall Fuels and Lubricants Meeting and Exposition. San Francisco, CA, October 19-22,1998. 25p.
184. JoshiS. Comprehensive product life-cycle analysis using output-input techniques. PhD dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997.
185. Gaines L, CuencaR. Costs of lithium-ion batteries for vehicles. Argonne National Laboratory, Transportation Technology R&D Center, Argonne, IL. ANL/ESD-42.
186. HackneyJ. Alternative fuel vehicle policy: a life cycle analysis tool for emissions, costs and energy efficiency with an application to the United States. Master of Science thesis, Technology and Policy Program, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1997.
187. DelucchiM.A. Hydrogen vehicles: an evaluation of fuel storage, performance, safety, environmental impacts and cost. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 14:(2):1989;81-130.