Are we living in a post-bureaucratic epoch?

Journal of Organizational Change Management

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 22-37

  McSweeney, Brendan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bureaucracy; Civil service; Organizational change; Postmodernism; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644522748     PISSN: 09534814     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09534810610643668     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Abercrombie, N., Hill, S. and Turner, B.S. (1980), The Dominant Ideology Thesis, Allen & Unwin, London.
2. Ackroyd, S. and Procter, S. (1998), "British manufacturing organisations and workplace relations", British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 36, pp. 163-83.
3. Alvesson, M. (1995), "The meaning and meaninglessness of postmodernism: some ironic remarks", Organization Studies, Vol. 6 No. 16, pp. 1047-75.
4. Alvesson, M. and Thompson, P. (2004), "Post bureaucracy", in Ackroyd, S., Batt, R., Thompson, P. and Tolbert, P.S. (Eds), The Oxford Handbook of Work and Organization, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. Archer, M.S. (1988), Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Ashkenas, R., Ulrich, D., Jick, T. and Kerr, S. (1998), The Boundaryless Organization: Breaking the Chains of Organizational Structure, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
7. Barker, J.R. (1993), "Tightening the iron cage: concertive control in self-managing teams", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, pp. 408-37.
8. Barley, S.R. and Kunda, G. (2001), "Bringing work back in", Organization Science, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 76-95.
9. Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London, trans. M. Ritter.
10. Bolton, S. (2004), Mixed Feelings: Emotion Management in the Workplace, Palgrave, London.
11. Budd, L.C. (2004), "Death of the new? Re-materialising the economy", in Budd, L. and Harris, L. (Eds), The eEconomy: Rhetoric or Reality?, Routledge, London.
12. Burchell, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (Eds) (1991), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
13. Butler, R. (1993), "The evolution of the civil service - a progress report", Public Administration, Vol. 71, pp. 395-406.
14. Cabinet Office (1991), Competing for Quality/Buying Better Public Services, Cm 1730, HMSO, London.
15. Cabinet Office (1999), Modernising Government, HMSO, London.
16. Castells, M. (1996), The Rise of the Network Society, Blackwell, Oxford.
17. Chandler, J., Barry, J. and Clark, H. (2002), "Stressing academe: the wear and tear of new public management", Human Relations, Vol. 55 No. 9, pp. 1051-69.
18. Child, J. and McGrath, R.G. (2001), "Organizations unfettered: organizational form in an information-intensive economy", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 6, pp. 1135-11498.
19. Child, J. and Rodrigues, S.B. (2002), "Corporate governance and new organizational forms: the problem of double and multiple agency", paper presented to the Joint Symposium on "Renewing Governance and Organizations: New Paradigms of Governance/" Academy of Management Meeting, Denver, CO, August.
20. Clegg, S. and Courpasson, D. (2004), "Political hybrids: Tocquevillean views on project organizations", Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 523-47.
21. Cm 4181 (1998), Public Services for the Future: Modernisation, Reform, Accountability, The Stationery Office, London.
22. CM 4273 (1999) Next Steps Report 1998, The Stationery Office, London.
23. Cmnd 3638 (1968), "The civil service", Report of the Committee, 1, HMSO, London.
24. Cmnd 8616 (1982), Efficiency & Effectiveness in the Civil Service, HMSO, London.
25. Cooke, P. (1990), Back to the Future: Modernity, Postmodernity and Locality, Unwin Hyman, London.
26. Coser, L.A. and Rosenberg, B. (Eds) (1964), Sociological Theory: A Book of Readings, 2nd ed., Macmillan, New York, NY.
27. Courpasson, D. (2000), "Managerial strategies of domination. Power in soft bureaucracies", Organization Studies, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 141-61.
28. Cross, R.L., Aimin, Y. and Louis, M.R. (2000), "Boundary activities in boundaryless organizations: a case-study of a transformation to a team-based structure", Human Relations, Vol. 53 No. 6, pp. 841-68.
29. Davidow, W.H. and Malone, M.S. (1992), The Virtual Corporation, Edward Burlingame Books/Harper Business, New York, NY.
30. de Araújo, J.F.F.E. (2001), "Improving service delivery: the crossroads between NPM and traditional bureaucracy", Public Administration, Vol. 79 No. 4, pp. 915-32.
31. Dent, M. (1995), "The new national health service: a case of postmodernism?", Organization Studies, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 875-900.
32. Dingwell, R. (1999), "'Risk Society': the cult of theory and the millennium", Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 33, pp. 474-91.
33. du Gay, P. (2003), "The tyranny of the epochal: change, epochalism and organizational reform", Organization, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 663-84.
34. Edwards, P. (2002), Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice, Blackwell, Oxford.
35. Efficiency Unit (1984), Consultancy, Inspection and Review Services in Government Departments - Efficiency Unit Report to the Prime Minister, HMSO, London.
36. Efficiency Unit (1988), Improving Management in Government: The Next Steps - Report to the Prime Minister, HMSO, London.
37. Efficiency Unit (1991), Making the Most of Next Steps: The Management of Ministers Departments and their Agencies - Report to the Prime Minister, HMSO, London.
38. Executive Office of the President, National Performance Review (1993), From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
39. Farmer, D.J. (2005), To Kill the King: Post-Traditional Governance and Bureaucracy, M.E. Sharpe, New York, NY.
40. Fosler, R.S. (1999), "The global challenge to governance: implications for national and sub-national government capacities and relationships", The Challenge to New Governance in the Twenty-First Century: Achieving Effective Central Local Relations, National Institute for Research Advancement, Tokyo.
41. Freidson, E. (2001), Professionalism. The Third Logic, Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.
42. Gains, F. (2003), "Surveying the landscape of modernisation: executive agencies under new labour", Public Policy & Administration, Vol. 18 No. 2.
43. Gallie, D., White, Y., Cheng, Y. and Tomlinson, M. (1998), Restructuring the Employment Relationship, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
44. Gamble, A. (1996), Hayek, Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.
45. Gorman, J. (2004), "Convergence to agreement", History & Theory, Vol. 43, pp. 107-16.
46. Green, W.A. (1995), "Periodizing world history", History & Theory, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 99-111.
47. Grint, K. and Woolgar, S. (1997), The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization, Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.
48. Guyomarch, A. (1999), "'Public Service', 'Public Management' and the 'Modernization' of French public administration", Public Administration, Vol. 77 No. 1, pp. 171-93.
49. Hall, R.H. (1963), "The concept of bureaucracy: an empirical assessment", The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 69 No. 1, pp. 32-40.
50. Harley, B. (1995), "Labour flexibility and workplace industrial relations: the Australian evidence", Monograph No. 12, Australian Centre for Industrial Relations Research and Training, University of Sydney, Sydney.
51. Harris, M. (1998), "Rethinking the virtual organisation", in Jackson, P.J. and van der Wielen, J.S. (Eds), Teleworking: International Perspectives - From Telecommuting to the Virtual Organisation, Routledge, London.
52. Harrison, S. and Smith, C. (2003), "Neo-bureaucracy and public management: the case of medicine in the national health service", Competition & Change, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 243-54.
53. HC 535-I; 535-II (1977), "The civil service", Eleventh Report from the Expenditure Committee Session 1976-77, Vols. 1/2, HMSO, London.
54. HC 236-I (1982), "Efficiency and effectiveness in the civil service", Third Report from the Treasury and Civil Service Committee, Session 1981-82, Report, Vol. 1, HMSO, London.
55. HC 449 (2005) Public Administration - 3rd Report Session 2004-05 - Minutes of Evidence, HMSO, London.
56. Heckscher, C. (1991), "Can business beat bureaucracy?", The American Prospect, Vol. 2 No. 5, pp. 114-28.
57. Heckscher, C. (1994), "Defining the post-bureaucratic type", in Heckscher, C. and Donnellon, A. (Eds), The Post Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
58. Heckscher, C. (1998), "If post-bureaucratic organization happened, would it be good?", paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, San Diego, CA, 8-12 August.
59. Heckscher, C. and Applegate, L. (1994), "Introduction", in Heckscher, C. and Donnellon, A. (Eds), The Post Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
60. Heinz, P.J., Nelson, R.L., Sandefur, R.L. and Laumann, E.O. (2005), Urban Lawyers: The New Social Structure of the Bar, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
61. Heller, A. and Fehér, F. (1988), The Postmodern Condition, Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.
62. Heydebrand, W.V. (1989), "New organizational forms", Work and Occupations, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 323-57.
63. Hill, S., Martin, R. and Harris, M. (2000), "Decentralization, integration and the post-bureaucratic organization: the case of R&D", Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 562-2.
64. Hochschild, A.R. (1983), The Managed Heart: Commercialisation of Human Feelings, UCP, Berkeley, CA.
65. Hodgson, D.E. (2004), "Project work: the legacy of bureaucratic control in the post-bureaucratic organization", Organization, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 81-100.
66. Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
67. Hood, C. (1998), The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
68. Hood, C. and Peters, G. (2004), "The middle aging of new public management: into the age of paradox?", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 267-82.
69. Hood, C., Scott, C., James, O., Jones, G. and Travers, T. (1999), Regulation Inside Government, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
70. Hudson, W.D. (Ed.) (1969), The Is/Ought Question, Macmillan, London.
71. Imrie, R. and Raco, M. (1999), "How new is the new local governance? Lessons from the United Kingdom", Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol. 24, pp. 45-63.
72. James, O. (2003), The Executive Agency Revolution in Whitehall, Palgrave, Basingstoke.
73. Kallinikos, J. (2004), "The social foundation of the bureaucratic order", Organization, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 13-36.
74. Kamarck, E.C. (2002), "Applying 21st-century government to the challenge of homeland security", The Forum, Vol. 1 No. 2.
75. Kamarck, E.C. (2003), "Public servants for the 21st century", in Donahue, J.D. and Nye, J.S. Jr (Eds), For the People: Can we Fix Public Service?, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
76. Keep, E. and Rainbird, H. (2000), "Towards the learning organization?", in Bach, S. and Sisson, K. (Eds), Personnel Management, Blackwell, Oxford.
77. Keynes, J. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, Macmillan, London.
78. Kofman, F. and Senge, P.M. (1993), "Communities of commitment: the heart of learning organizations", Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 5-23.
79. Løwendahl, B. and Revang, Ø. (1998), "Challenges to existing strategy - theory in a postindustrial society", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, pp. 755-73.
80. Lloyd, C. and Newell, H. (1998), "Computerising the salesforce", New Technology, Work and Employment, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 105-15.
81. Lynn, L.E. (1994), "Government lite", The American Prospect Online, available at: www.prospect.org/print/V5/16/lynn-l.html (accessed 6 January 2006).
82. Lyotard, J-F. (1986) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Manchester University Press, Manchester, trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi.
83. Lyotard, J-F. (1993), Jean-François Lyotard: Political Writings, University College London Press, London, (trans. B. Readings and K.P. Geiman).
84. Lyotard, J-F. and Thébaud, J.L. (1985), Just Gaming, Manchester University Press, Manchester, (trans. W. Godzich).
85. McSweeney, B. (1988), "Accounting for the audit commission", The Political Quarterly, Vol. 59 No. 1, pp. 28-43.
86. McSweeney, B. (1994), "Management by accounting", in Hopwood, A.G. and Miller, P. (Eds), Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
87. McSweeney, B. (1995), "Accounting and organizational action: a subsuming explanation or situated explanations?", Accounting, Management & Information Technologies, Vol. 5 Nos 3/4, pp. 245-82.
88. McSweeney, B. (2000), "Looking forward to the past", Accounting, Organizations & Society, Vol. 25, pp. 767-86.
89. McSweeney, B. (2002), "Hofstede's identification of national cultural differences and their consequences: a triumph of faith - a failure of analysis", Human Relations, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 89-118.
90. McSweeney, B. and Duncan, S. (1998), "Agency or structure, discourse or meta-narrative: the case of the financial management initiative", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 332-61.
91. Maravelias, C. (2003), "Post-bureaucracy - control through professional freedom", Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 547-66.
92. Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., Mathews, J.A., Miles, G. and Coleman, H.J. Jr (1997), "Anticipating the cellular form", Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 7-19.
93. National Audit Office (1986), The Financial Management Initiative, HMSO, London.
94. Parker, M. (1992), "Post-modern organizations or post-modern organization theory", Organization Studies, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 1-17.
95. Pollock, A.M. (2004), NHS Plc, Verso, London.
96. Power, M. (1997), The Audit Society, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
97. Prince, M.J. (2000), "Banishing bureaucracy or hatching a hybrid? The Canadian food inspection agency and the politics of reinventing government", Governance: An International Journal of Policy Administration, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 215-32.
98. Rhodes, R.A.W. (2000), "The governance narrative: key findings and lessons from the ESRC's Whitehall programme", Public Administration, Vol. 78 No. 2, pp. 345-63.
99. Rifkin, J. (2004), The European Dream, Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.
100. Rose, M.A. (1991), The Post-Modern and the Post-Industrial, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
101. Runciman, W.G. (2004), Hutton and Butler: Lifting the Lid on the Workings of Power, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
102. Saint-Martin, D. (2000), Building the New Managerialist State, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
103. Schofield, J. (2001), "The old ways are the best? The durability and usefulness of bureaucracy in public sector management", Organization, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 77-96.
104. Selznick, P. (1992), The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
105. SI 1815 (2004), The Local Authorities (Elected Mayors) England Regulations 2004, HMSO, London.
106. Stelzer, I. (Ed.) (2004), Neoconservatism, Atlantic Books, London.
107. Stone, D. (1996), Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process, Frank Cass, London.
108. Taylor, S. (1997), "'Empowerment' or 'Degradation'? Total quality management in the service sector", in Brown, R.K. (Ed.), The Changing Shape of Work, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
109. Taylor, P. and Bain, P. (1998), "An assembly line in the head", Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 101-17.
110. Thomas, R. and Dunkerley, D. (1999), "Janus and the bureaucrats: middle management in the public sector", Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 28-41.
111. Thompson, P., Warhurst, C. and Callaghan, G. (2001), "Ignorant theory and knowledgeable workers: interrogating the connections between knowledge, skills and service", Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 37 No. 7, pp. 923-42.
112. Vattimo, G. (1991), The End of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.
113. Zuboff, S. (1988), In the Age of the Smart Machine, Basic Books, New York, NY.
114. Peck, E. (2004), "New labour's modernization in the public sector: a neo-durkheimian approach and the case of mental health services", Public Administration, Vol. 82 No. 1, pp. 83-108.