Foraging and building in subterranean termites: Task switchers or reserve labourers?

Insectes Sociaux

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 56-64

  Evans, T A ^a,b  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Disturbance; Foraging behaviour; Nasutitermes; Neutral Red; Nile Blue A

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; DISTURBANCE; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; TERMITE; WORKER CASTE;

ISOPTERA; NASUTITERMES; NASUTITERMES EXITIOSUS; RHINOTERMITIDAE; TERMITIDAE;

EID: 33644513106     PISSN: 00201812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00040-005-0835-8     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Anderson C. and McShea D.W. 2001. Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies. Biol. Rev. 76: 211-237
2. Anderson C. and Ratnieks F.L.W. 1999. Task partitioning in insect societies. I. Effect of colony size on queueing delay and colony ergonomic efficiency. Am. Nat. 154: 521-535
3. Beshers S.N. and Fewell J.H. 2001. Models of division of labour in social insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 46: 413-440
4. Bourke A.F.G. 1999. Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 245-257
5. Calderone N.W and Page R.E. 1996. Temporal polyethism and behavioural canalization in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Anim. Behav. 51: 631-643
6. Crosland M.W.J and Traniello J.F.A. 1997. Behavioural plasticity in division of labour in the lower termite Reticulitermes fukienensis. Naturwissenschaften 84: 208-211
7. Crosland M.W.J., Lok C.M., Wong T.C., Shakarad M. and Traniello J.F.A. 1997. Division of labour in a lower termite: the majority of tasks are performed by older workers. Anim. Behav. 54: 999-1012
8. Evans T.A. 1997. Evaluation of marks for Australian subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae and Termitidae). Sociobiology 29: 277-292
9. Evans T.A. 2000. Fast marking of termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology 36: 517-523
10. Evans T.A. and Gleeson P.V. 2001. Seasonal and daily activity patterns of subterranean, wood-eating termite foragers. Aust. J. Zool. 49: 311-321
11. Evans T.A., Lenz M. and Gleeson P.V. 1998. Testing assumptions of mark-recapture protocols for estimating population size using Australian, mound-building, subterranean termites. Ecol. Entomol. 23: 101-121
12. Franks N.R. and Tofts C. 1994. Foraging for work: how tasks allocate workers. Anim. Behav. 48: 470-472
13. Franks N.R., Pratt S.C., Mallon E.B., Britton N.F. and Sumpter D.J.T. 2002. Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 357: 1567-1583
14. Gordon D.M. 1989. Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants. Anim. Behav. 38: 194-204
15. Gordon D.M. 1996. The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature 380: 121-124
16. Gordon D.M. and Mehdiabadi N.J. 1999. Encounter rate and task allocation in harvester ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 45: 370-377
17. Grassé P.P. 1982. Termitologia, Tome 1: Anatomie, Physiologie, Reproduction des Termites. Masson, Paris. 676 pp
18. Grassé P.P. 1984. Termitologia, Tome 2: Fondation des Sociétés, Construction. Masson, Paris. 613 pp
19. Grassé P.P. 1986. Termitologia, Tome 3: Comportement, Socialité, Ecologie, Evolution, Systématique. Masson, Paris. 715 pp
20. Greene M.J. and Gordon D.M. 2003. Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions. Nature 423: 32
21. Hinze B. and Leuthold R.H. 1999. Age related polyethism and activity rhythms in the nest of the termite Macrotermes bellicosus (Isoptera, Termitidae). Insect. Soc. 46: 392-397
22. Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 732 pp
23. Jeanne R.L. 1996. Regulation of nest construction behaviour in Polybia occidentalis. Anim. Behav. 52: 473-488
24. Johnson B.R. 2002. Reallocation of labour in honeybee colonies during heat stress: the relative roles of task-switching and the activation of reserve labour. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51: 188-196
25. Karsai I and Wenzel J.W. 1998. Productivity, individual-level and colony-level flexibility, and organization of work as consequences of colony size. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 8665-8669
26. Kolmes S.A. 1985. A quantitative study of the division of labour among worker honeybees. Z. Tierpsychol. 68: 287-302
27. McMahan E.A. 1977. Mound repair and foraging polyethism in workers of Nasutitermes exitiosus (Hill) (Isoptera, Termitidae). Insect. Soc. 24: 225-232
28. Michener C.D. 1974. The Social Behaviour of the Bees: a couparative study. Beknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge MA. 404 pp
29. Miura T. and Matsumoto T. 1995. Worker polymorphism and division of labor in the foraging behaviour of the black marching termite Hospitalitermes medioflavus, on Borneo Island. Naturwissenschaften 82: 564-567
30. Oster G.F. and Wilson E.O. 1978. Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ. 352 pp
31. Robinson G.E., Page R.E., Strambi C. and Strambi A. 1989. Hormonal and genetic control of behavioral integration in honey bee colonies. Science 246: 109-112
32. Robinson G.E., Page R.E. and Huang Z.-Y. 1994. Temporal polyethism in social insects is a developmental process. Anim. Behav. 48: 467-469
33. Rosengaus R.B. and Traniello J.F.A. 1993. Temporal polyethism in incipient colonies of the dampwood termite Zootermopsis angusticollis: a single multi-age caste. J. Insect Behav. 6: 237-252
34. Seeley T.D. 1982. Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11: 287-293
35. Theraulaz G., Bonabeau E. and Deneubourg J.L. 1998. Response threshold reinforcement and division of labour insect societies. Proc. R. Soc. series B 265: 327-332
36. Thomas M.L. and Elgar M.A. 2003. Colony size affects division of labour in the ponerine ant Rhytidoponera metallica. Naturwissenschaften 90: 88-92
37. Traniello J.F.A. 1978. Caste in a primitive ant: absence of age polyethism in Amblyopone. Science 202: 770-772
38. Traniello J.F.A. and Rosengaus R.B. 1997. Ecology, evolution and division of labour in social insects. Anim. Behav. 53: 209-213
39. Wilson E.O. 1971. The Insect Societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. 548 pp